Retag as FnEntry on `drop_in_place`
This commit changes the mir drop shim to always retag its argument as if it were a `&mut`.
cc rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines#373
Make LLD build forward-compatible with LLVM 16
Switch to using the cmake module instead of llvm-config. I believe this also removes the need for llvm-config-wrapper.
LLVM_CONFIG_PATH is no longer supported as of LLVM 16, switch to
using the cmake module instead.
We separately return the llvm-config and cmake directory paths,
because llvm-config always refers to the host binary, while
the cmake directory is for the target triple.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #104741 (Switch `#[track_caller]` back to a no-op unless feature gate is enabled)
- #105769 (add function to tell the identical errors for ambiguity_errors)
- #105843 (Suggest associated const on possible capitalization mistake)
- #105966 (Re-enable `Fn` trait call notation error for non-tuple argument)
- #106002 (codegen tests: adapt patterns to also work with v0 symbol mangling)
- #106010 (Give opaque types a better coherence error)
- #106016 (rustdoc: simplify link anchor to section expand JS)
- #106024 (Fix ICE due to `todo!()` in `rustdoc` for `Term`s)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix ICE due to `todo!()` in `rustdoc` for `Term`s
Left a todo awhile ago (I think), so fill it in to print a const for `Term`s.
Fixes#105952.
Should I add some annotations to the rustdoc test?
Re-enable `Fn` trait call notation error for non-tuple argument
I have no idea why I delayed this bug... but also there doesn't seem to be a UI test that actually shows a change, so maybe that's why.
Fixes#105936
add function to tell the identical errors for ambiguity_errors
if 2 errors of the kind and ident and span of the ident, b1, b2 and misc1 misc2 are the same we call these 2 ambiguity errors identical
prevent identical ambiguity error from pushing into vector of ambiguity_errors this will fix#105177
Switch `#[track_caller]` back to a no-op unless feature gate is enabled
This patch fixes a regression, in which `#[track_caller]`, which was previously a no-op, was changed to actually turn on the behavior. This should instead only happen behind the `closure_track_caller` feature gate.
Also, add a warning for the user to understand how their code will compile depending on the feature gate being turned on or not.
Fixes#104588
Fix impl block in const expr
Fixes#83026.
The problem was that we didn't visit block expressions. Considering how big the [walk_expr](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/src/rustc_hir/intravisit.rs.html#678) function is, I decided to instead implement the `hir` visitor on the struct. It also answers the question which was in a comment for `RustdocVisitor`: we should have used a visitor instead of our ad-hoc implementation.
Adding this visitor also added some extra checks that weren't present before (check changes in `rustdoc-ui` tests).
r? `@notriddle`
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #105584 (add assert messages if chunks/windows are length 0)
- #105602 (interpret: add read_machine_[ui]size convenience methods)
- #105824 (str.lines() docstring: clarify that line endings are not returned)
- #105980 (Refer to "Waker" rather than "RawWaker" in `drop` comment)
- #105986 (Fix typo in reading_half_a_pointer.rs)
- #105995 (Add regression test for #96530)
- #106008 (Sort lint_groups in no_lint_suggestion)
- #106014 (Add comment explaining what the scrape-examples-toggle.goml GUI test is about)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Clarify that raw retags are not permitted in Mir
Not sure when this changed, but documentation and the validator needed to be updated. This also removes raw retags from custom mir.
cc rust-lang/miri#2735
r? `@RalfJung`
Correct branch-protection ModFlagBehavior for Aarch64 on LLVM-15
When building with Fat LTO and BTI enabled on aarch64, the BTI is set to `Module::Min` for alloc shim but is set to `Module::Error` for the crate. This was fine when we were using LLVM-14 but LLVM-15 changes it's behaviour to support for compiling with different `mbranch-protection` flags.
Refer:
b0343a38a5
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102162
Don't ICE in `check_must_not_suspend_ty` for mismatched tuple arity
These expressions are just used for their spans, so make it best-effort here.
Fixes#105728
Sort lint_groups in no_lint_suggestion
The no_lint_suggestion routine passes a vector of lint group names to find_best_match_for_name. That routine depends on the sort order of its input vector, which matters in case multiple inputs are at the same Levenshtein distance to the target name.
However, no_lint_suggestion currently just passes lint_groups.keys() as input vector - this is sorted in hash value order, which is not guaranteed to be stable, and in fact differs between big- and little-endian host platforms, causing test failures on s390x.
To fix this, always sort the lint groups before using their names as input to find_best_match_for_name. In doing so, prefer non- deprecated lint group names over deprecated ones, and then use alphabetical order.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105379
Refer to "Waker" rather than "RawWaker" in `drop` comment
In my view this is technically more correct as `Waker` actually implements `Drop` (which calls the `drop` method) whereas `RawWaker` does not.
str.lines() docstring: clarify that line endings are not returned
Previously, the str.lines() docstring stated that lines are split at line endings, but not whether those were returned or not. This new version of the docstring states this explicitly, avoiding the need of getting to doctests to get an answer to this FAQ.
Rename `assert_uninit_valid` intrinsic
It's not about "uninit" anymore but about "filling with 0x01 bytes" so the name should at least try to reflect that.
This is actually not fully correct though, as it does still panic for all uninit with `-Zstrict-init-checks`. I'm not sure what the best way is to deal with that not causing confusion. I guess we could just remove the flag? I don't think having it makes a lot of sense anymore with the direction that we have chose to go. It could be relevant again if #100423 lands so removing it may be a bit over eager.
r? `@RalfJung`
