stabilize #[used]
closes#40289
RFC for stabilization: rust-lang/rfcs#2386
r? @Centril
Where should this be documented? Currently the documentation is in the unstable book
There were only some UI tests that covered this function.
Since there's more diagnostic work going on, I think it makes
sense to have this unit tested.
Invocation/expansion ID (aka `Mark`) is not really necessary for resolving a macro path.
What is really necessary is its parent module, parent expansion and parent legacy scope.
This is required for validation resolutions of built-in attributes, which don't get their own `Mark`s
This commit updates the debuginfo that is encoded in all of our released
artifacts by default. Currently it has paths like `/checkout/src/...` but these
are a little inconsistent and have changed over time. This commit instead
attempts to actually define the file paths in our debuginfo to be consistent
between releases.
All debuginfo paths are now intended to be `/rustc/$sha` where `$sha` is the git
sha of the released compiler. Sub-paths are all paths into the git repo at that
`$sha`.
Allow named lifetimes in async functions.
- Fixes#53174
Code by @eddyb; @cramertj suggested I lift it off another change so we can fix#53174.
r? @cramertj
For some weird reason this fixes `intrinsic-move-val`. It also affects
various test heuristics. I removed one test (`reborrow_basic`) that
didn't seem to really be testing anything in particular anymore,
compared to all the other tests we've got.
rustc_resolve: inject `uniform_paths` canaries regardless of the feature-gate, on Rust 2018.
This PR is an attempt at future-proofing "anchored paths" by emitting the same ambiguity errors that `#![feature(uniform_paths)]` would, with slightly changed phrasing (see added UI tests).
Also, on top of #54005, this PR allows this as well:
```rust
use crate_name;
use crate_name::foo;
```
In that any ambiguity between an extern crate and an import *of that same crate* is ignored.
r? @petrochenkov cc @aturon @Centril @joshtriplett
#53359: putting multiple unresolved import on single line
r? @estebank
Here is WIP implementation of #53359
this PR have clubbed multiple unresolved imports into a single line.
I think still two things need to improve like giving specific `label message` for each span of multi_span(how we can do this?) and second we are getting a warning while compiling, stating something like `E0432` have been passed before.
