Modifies `BikeshedIntrinsicFrom` to forbid lifetime extensions on
references. This static check can be opted out of with the
`Assume::lifetimes` flag.
Fixes#129097
Previously, `Tree::from_enum`'s implementation branched into three disjoint
cases:
1. enums that uninhabited
2. enums for which all but one variant is uninhabited
3. enums with multiple inhabited variants
This branching (incorrectly) did not differentiate between variantful and
variantless uninhabited enums. In both cases, we assumed (and asserted) that
uninhabited enums are zero-sized types. This assumption is false for enums like:
enum Uninhabited { A(!, u128) }
...which, currently, has the same size as `u128`. This faulty assumption
manifested as the ICE reported in #126460.
In this PR, we revise the first case of `Tree::from_enum` to consider only the
narrow category of "enums that are uninhabited ZSTs". These enums, whose layouts
are described with `Variants::Single { index }`, are special in their layouts
otherwise resemble the `!` type and cannot be descended into like typical enums.
This first case captures uninhabited enums like:
enum Uninhabited { A(!, !), B(!) }
The second case is revised to consider the broader category of "enums that defer
their layout to one of their variants"; i.e., enums whose layouts are described
with `Variants::Single { index }` and that do have a variant at `index`. This
second case captures uninhabited enums that are not ZSTs, like:
enum Uninhabited { A(!, u128) }
...which represent their variants with `Variants::Single`.
Finally, the third case is revised to cover the broader category of "enums with
multiple variants", which captures uninhabited, non-ZST enums like:
enum Uninhabited { A(u8, !), B(!, u32) }
...which represent their variants with `Variants::Multiple`.
This PR also adds a comment requested by RalfJung in his review of #126358 to
`compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/discriminant.rs`.
Fixes#126460
Previously, the implementation of `Tree::from_enum` incorrectly
treated enums with `Variants::Single` and `Variants::Multiple`
identically. This is incorrect for `Variants::Single` enums,
which delegate their layout to that of a variant with a particular
index (or no variant at all if the enum is empty).
This flaw manifested first as an ICE. `Tree::from_enum` attempted
to compute the tag of variants other than the one at
`Variants::Single`'s `index`, and fell afoul of a sanity-checking
assertion in `compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/discriminant.rs`.
This assertion is non-load-bearing, and can be removed; the routine
its in is well-behaved even without it.
With the assertion removed, the proximate issue becomes apparent:
calling `Tree::from_variant` on a variant that does not exist is
ill-defined. A sanity check the given variant has
`FieldShapes::Arbitrary` fails, and the analysis is (correctly)
aborted with `Err::NotYetSupported`.
This commit corrects this chain of failures by ensuring that
`Tree::from_variant` is not called on variants that are, as far as
layout is concerned, nonexistent. Specifically, the implementation
of `Tree::from_enum` is now partitioned into three cases:
1. enums that are uninhabited
2. enums for which all but one variant is uninhabited
3. enums with multiple inhabited variants
`Tree::from_variant` is now only invoked in the third case. In the
first case, `Tree::uninhabited()` is produced. In the second case,
the layout is delegated to `Variants::Single`'s index.
Fixes#125811
We already do this for a number of crates, e.g. `rustc_middle`,
`rustc_span`, `rustc_metadata`, `rustc_span`, `rustc_errors`.
For the ones we don't, in many cases the attributes are a mess.
- There is no consistency about order of attribute kinds (e.g.
`allow`/`deny`/`feature`).
- Within attribute kind groups (e.g. the `feature` attributes),
sometimes the order is alphabetical, and sometimes there is no
particular order.
- Sometimes the attributes of a particular kind aren't even grouped
all together, e.g. there might be a `feature`, then an `allow`, then
another `feature`.
This commit extends the existing sorting to all compiler crates,
increasing consistency. If any new attribute line is added there is now
only one place it can go -- no need for arbitrary decisions.
Exceptions:
- `rustc_log`, `rustc_next_trait_solver` and `rustc_type_ir_macros`,
because they have no crate attributes.
- `rustc_codegen_gcc`, because it's quasi-external to rustc (e.g. it's
ignored in `rustfmt.toml`).
Safe Transmute: Compute transmutability from `rustc_target::abi::Layout`
In its first step of computing transmutability, `rustc_transmutability` constructs a byte-level representation of type layout (`Tree`). Previously, this representation was computed for ADTs by inspecting the ADT definition and performing our own layout computations. This process was error-prone, verbose, and limited our ability to analyze many types (particularly default-repr types).
In this PR, we instead construct `Tree`s from `rustc_target::abi::Layout`s. This helps ensure that layout optimizations are reflected our analyses, and increases the kinds of types we can now analyze, including:
- default repr ADTs
- transparent unions
- `UnsafeCell`-containing types
Overall, this PR expands the expressvity of `rustc_transmutability` to be much closer to the transmutability analysis performed by miri. Future PRs will work to close the remaining gaps (e.g., support for `Box`, raw pointers, `NonZero*`, coroutines, etc.).
r? `@compiler-errors`
In its first step of computing transmutability, `rustc_transmutability`
constructs a byte-level representation of type layout (`Tree`). Previously, this
representation was computed for ADTs by inspecting the ADT definition and
performing our own layout computations. This process was error-prone, verbose,
and limited our ability to analyze many types (particularly default-repr types).
In this PR, we instead construct `Tree`s from `rustc_target::abi::Layout`s. This
helps ensure that layout optimizations are reflected our analyses, and increases
the kinds of types we can now analyze, including:
- default repr ADTs
- transparent unions
- `UnsafeCell`-containing types
Overall, this PR expands the expressvity of `rustc_transmutability` to be much
closer to the transmutability analysis performed by miri. Future PRs will work
to close the remaining gaps (e.g., support for `Box`, raw pointers, `NonZero*`,
coroutines, etc.).
Add `tag_for_variant` query
This query allows for sharing code between `rustc_const_eval` and `rustc_transmutability`. It's a precursor to a PR I'm working on to entirely replace the bespoke layout computations in `rustc_transmutability`.
r? `@compiler-errors`
We can (and will) support analyzing the transmutability of types
whose layouts aren't completely specified by its repr. This change
ensures that the error messages remain sensible after this support
lands.
The source referent absolutely must be smaller than the destination
referent of a ref-to-ref transmute; the excess bytes referenced
cannot arise from thin air, even if those bytes are uninitialized.
That is, change `diagnostic_outside_of_impl` and
`untranslatable_diagnostic` from `allow` to `deny`, because more than
half of the compiler has be converted to use translated diagnostics.
This commit removes more `deny` attributes than it adds `allow`
attributes, which proves that this change is warranted.
- Sort dependencies and features sections.
- Add `tidy` markers to the sorted sections so they stay sorted.
- Remove empty `[lib`] sections.
- Remove "See more keys..." comments.
Excluded files:
- rustc_codegen_{cranelift,gcc}, because they're external.
- rustc_lexer, because it has external use.
- stable_mir, because it has external use.
Safe Transmute: Fix ICE (due to UnevaluatedConst)
This patch updates the code that looks at the `Assume` type when evaluating if transmutation is possible. An ICE was being triggered in the case that the `Assume` parameter contained an unevaluated const (in this test case, due to a function with missing parameter names).
Fixes#110892
This patch updates the code that looks at the `Assume` type when evaluating if
transmutation is possible. An ICE was being triggered in the case that the
`Assume` parameter contained an unevaluated const (in this test case, due to a
function with missing parameter names).
Fixes#110892
