Use stable code in doc examples (libcollections)
Main task is to change from String::from_str to String::from in examples for String
(the latter constructor is stable). While I'm at it, also remove redundant feature flags,
fix some other instances of unstable code in examples (in examples for stable
methods), and remove some use of usize in examples too.
Changes the style guidelines regarding unit tests to recommend using a
sub-module named "tests" instead of "test" for unit tests as "test"
might clash with imports of libtest.
This is an implementation of [RFC 1030][rfc] which adds these traits to the
prelude and additionally removes all inherent `into_iter` methods on collections
in favor of the trait implementation (which is now accessible by default).
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1030
This is technically a breaking change due to the prelude additions and removal
of inherent methods, but it is expected that essentially no code breaks in
practice.
[breaking-change]
Closes#24538
This is a deprecated attribute that is slated for removal, and it also affects
all implementors of the trait. This commit removes the attribute and fixes up
implementors accordingly. The primary implementation which was lost was the
ability to compare `&[T]` and `Vec<T>` (in that order).
This change also modifies the `assert_eq!` macro to not consider both directions
of equality, only the one given in the left/right forms to the macro. This
modification is motivated due to the fact that `&[T] == Vec<T>` no longer
compiles, causing hundreds of errors in unit tests in the standard library (and
likely throughout the community as well).
Closes#19470
[breaking-change]
* The `io::Seek` trait.
* The `Iterator::{partition, unsip}` methods.
* The `Vec::into_boxed_slice` method.
* The `LinkedList::append` method.
* The `{or_insert, or_insert_with` methods in the `Entry` APIs.
r? @alexcrichton
This commit cleans out a large amount of deprecated APIs from the standard
library and some of the facade crates as well, updating all users in the
compiler and in tests as it goes along.
* The `io::Seek` trait, and `SeekFrom` enum.
* The `Iterator::{partition, unsip}` methods.
* The `Vec::into_boxed_slice` method.
* The `LinkedList::append` method.
* The `{or_insert, or_insert_with` methods in the `Entry` APIs.
This is a deprecated attribute that is slated for removal, and it also affects
all implementors of the trait. This commit removes the attribute and fixes up
implementors accordingly. The primary implementation which was lost was the
ability to compare `&[T]` and `Vec<T>` (in that order).
This change also modifies the `assert_eq!` macro to not consider both directions
of equality, only the one given in the left/right forms to the macro. This
modification is motivated due to the fact that `&[T] == Vec<T>` no longer
compiles, causing hundreds of errors in unit tests in the standard library (and
likely throughout the community as well).
cc #19470
[breaking-change]
The collections debug helpers no longer prefix output with the
collection name, in line with the current conventions for Debug
implementations. Implementations that want to preserve the current
behavior can simply add a `try!(write!(fmt, "TypeName "));` at the
beginning of the `fmt` method.
[breaking-change]
The collections debug helpers no longer prefix output with the
collection name, in line with the current conventions for Debug
implementations. Implementations that want to preserve the current
behavior can simply add a `try!(write!(fmt, "TypeName "));` at the
beginning of the `fmt` method.
[breaking-change]
This is the kind of change that one is expected to need to make to
accommodate overloaded-`box`.
----
Note that this is not *all* of the changes necessary to accommodate
Issue 22181. It is merely the subset of those cases where there was
already a let-binding in place that made it easy to add the necesasry
type ascription.
(For unnamed intermediate `Box` values, one must go down a different
route; `Box::new` is the option that maximizes portability, but has
potential inefficiency depending on whether the call is inlined.)
----
There is one place worth note, `run-pass/coerce-match.rs`, where I
used an ugly form of `Box<_>` type ascription where I would have
preferred to use `Box::new` to accommodate overloaded-`box`. I
deliberately did not use `Box::new` here, because that is already done
in coerce-match-calls.rs.
----
Precursor for overloaded-`box` and placement-`in`; see Issue 22181.
This breaks all implementors of FromIterator, as they must now accept IntoIterator instead of Iterator. The fix for this is generally trivial (change the bound, and maybe call into_iter() on the argument to get the old argument).
Users of FromIterator should be unaffected because Iterators are IntoIterator.
[breaking-change]
This breaks all implementors of Extend, as they must now accept IntoIterator instead of Iterator. The fix for this is generally trivial (change the bound, and maybe call into_iter() on the argument to get the old argument).
Users of Extend should be unaffected because Iterators are IntoIterator.
[breaking-change]
