This isn't actually necessary any more with the advent of `$crate` and changes
in the compiler to expand macros to `::core::$foo` in the context of a
`#![no_std]` crate.
The libcore inner module was also trimmed down a bit to the bare bones.
As there’s no C++ runtime any more there’s really no point in having anything but Rust tags being made.
I’ve also taken the liberty of excluding the compiler parts of this in the `librust%,,` pattern substitution. Whether or not this is “correct” will depend on whether you want tags for the compiler or for general use. For myself, I want it for general use.
I’m not sure how much people use the tags files anyway. I definitely do, but with Racer existing the tags files aren’t quite so necessary.
Guessing Game states that "Rust only imports a few things into every
program, the ‘prelude’". That isn't strictly true. That is all it
imports by default and the change clarifies that point.
This is a minor [breaking-change], as it changes what
`boxed_str.to_owned()` does (previously it would deref to `&str` and
call `to_owned` on that to get a `String`). However `Box<str>` is such an
exceptionally rare type that this is not expected to be a serious
concern. Also a `Box<str>` can be freely converted to a `String` to
obtain the previous result anyway.
I think this was just missed when `Send` and `Sync` were redone, since it seems odd to not be able to use things like `Arc<AtomicPtr>`. If it was intentional feel free to just close this.
I used another test as a template for writing mine, so I hope I got all the headers and stuff right.
VecMap doesn't really fit with the current standard library's strategy (small!).
I've mirrored the code to https://github.com/contain-rs/vec-map
but @GBGamer has already claimed the name on crates.io a couple months ago for the same purpose. It hasn't been updated since, though.
CC @rust-lang/libs
This is a minor [breaking-change], as it changes what
`boxed_str.to_owned()` does (previously it would deref to `&str` and
call `to_owned` on that to get a `String`). However `Box<str>` is such an
exceptionally rare type that this is not expected to be a serious
concern. Also a `Box<str>` can be freely converted to a `String` to
obtain the previous behaviour anyway.
I've been baking this out of tree for long enough. This is currently about ~2/5ths the size of TRPL. Time to get it in tree so it can be more widely maintained and scrutinized. I've preserved the whole gruesome history including various rewrites. I can definitely squash these a fair amount if desired. Some random people submitted minor fixes though, so they're mixed in.
Edit: forgot to link to rendered http://cglab.ca/~abeinges/blah/turpl/_book/
Edit2:
To streamline the review process, I'm going to break this into sections that need official "domain expert" approval:
# Summary
* [ ] references.md -- very important, needs work
* [x] Meet Safe and Unsafe: reviewed by @aturon
* [x] Data Layout: reviewed by @arielb1
* [x] Ownership: reviewed by @aturon ( and sorta @nikomatsakis ) -- significantly updated, may need re-r
* [x] Coversions: reviewed by @nrc
* [x] Uninitialized Memory: reviewed by @pnkfelix
* [x] Ownership-Oriented Resource Management: reviewed by @aturon
* [x] Unwinding: reviewed by @alexcrichton
* [x] Concurrency: reviewed by @aturon
* [x] Implementing Vec: r? @huonw
This isn't actually necessary any more with the advent of `$crate` and changes
in the compiler to expand macros to `::core::$foo` in the context of a
`#![no_std]` crate.
The libcore inner module was also trimmed down a bit to the bare bones.
As there’s no C++ runtime any more there’s really no point in having
anything but Rust tags being made.
I’ve also taken the liberty of excluding the compiler parts of this in
the `librust%,,` pattern substitution. Whether or not this is “correct”
will depend on whether you want tags for the compiler or for general
use. For myself, I want it for general use.
I’m not sure how much people use the tags files anyway. I definitely do,
but with Racer existing the tags files aren’t quite so necessary.
The API we're calling requires us to pass an absolute point in time as an
argument (`pthread_cond_timedwait`) so we call `gettimeofday` ahead of time to
then add the specified duration to. Unfortuantely the current "add the duration"
logic forgot to take into account the current time's sub-second precision (e.g.
the `tv_usec` field was ignored), causing sub-second duration waits to return
spuriously.
Added definitions for 'Expression', 'Expression-Oriented Language' and 'Statement' to glossary.
Sorted the definitions alphabetically.
r? @steveklabnik
These methods are all covered by [RFC 1158] and are currently all available on
stable Rust via the [`net2` crate][net2] on crates.io. This commit does not
touch the timeout related functions as they're still waiting on `Duration` which
is unstable anyway, so punting in favor of the `net2` crate wouldn't buy much.
[RFC 1158]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1158
[net2]: http://crates.io/crates/net2
The API we're calling requires us to pass an absolute point in time as an
argument (`pthread_cond_timedwait`) so we call `gettimeofday` ahead of time to
then add the specified duration to. Unfortuantely the current "add the duration"
logic forgot to take into account the current time's sub-second precision (e.g.
the `tv_usec` field was ignored), causing sub-second duration waits to return
spuriously.
