Stabilise unix_process_wait_more, extra ExitStatusExt methods
This stabilises the feature `unix_process_wait_more`. Tracking issue #80695, FCP needed.
This was implemented in #79982 and merged in January.
Implement split_array and split_array_mut
This implements `[T]::split_array::<const N>() -> (&[T; N], &[T])` and `[T; N]::split_array::<const M>() -> (&[T; M], &[T])` and their mutable equivalents. These are another few “missing” array implementations now that const generics are a thing, similar to #74373, #75026, etc. Fixes#74674.
This implements `[T; N]::split_array` returning an array and a slice. Ultimately, this is probably not what we want, we would want the second return value to be an array of length N-M, which will likely be possible with future const generics enhancements. We need to implement the array method now though, to immediately shadow the slice method. This way, when the slice methods get stabilized, calling them on an array will not be automatic through coercion, so we won't have trouble stabilizing the array methods later (cf. into_iter debacle).
An unchecked version of `[T]::split_array` could also be added as in #76014. This would not be needed for `[T; N]::split_array` as that can be compile-time checked. Edit: actually, since split_at_unchecked is internal-only it could be changed to be split_array-only.
Make new symbol mangling scheme default for compiler itself.
As suggest in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89917#issuecomment-945888574, this PR enables the new symbol mangling scheme for the compiler itself. The standard library is still compiled using the legacy mangling scheme so that the new symbol format does not show up in user code (yet).
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
My change to use `Type::def_id()` (formerly `Type::def_id_full()`) in
more places caused some docs to show up that used to be missed by
rustdoc. Those docs contained unescaped square brackets, which triggered
linkcheck errors. This commit escapes the square brackets and adds this
particular instance to the linkcheck exception list.
Inline CStr::from_ptr
Inlining this function is valuable, as it allows LLVM to apply `strlen`-specific optimizations without having to enable LTO.
For instance, the following function:
```rust
pub fn f(p: *const c_char) -> Option<u8> {
unsafe { CStr::from_ptr(p) }.to_bytes().get(0).copied()
}
```
Looks like this if `CStr::from_ptr` is allowed to be inlined.
```asm
before:
push rax
call qword ptr [rip + std::ffi::c_str::CStr::from_ptr@GOTPCREL]
mov rcx, rax
cmp rdx, 1
sete dl
test rax, rax
sete al
or al, dl
jne .LBB1_2
mov dl, byte ptr [rcx]
.LBB1_2:
xor al, 1
pop rcx
ret
after:
mov dl, byte ptr [rdi]
test dl, dl
setne al
ret
```
Note that optimization turned this from O(N) to O(1) in terms of performance, as LLVM knows that it doesn't really need to call `strlen` to determine whether a string is empty or not.
It should be preferred over `def_id_no_primitives()`, so it should have
a shorter name. I also put it before `def_id_no_primitives()` so that it
shows up first in the docs.
The old name was confusing because it's easy to assume that using
`def_id()` is fine, but in some situations it's incorrect. In general,
`def_id_full()` should be preferred, so `def_id_full()` should have a
shorter name. That will happen in the next commit.
Now that it's only implemented for `Type`, using inherent methods
instead means that imports are no longer necessary. Also, `GetDefId` is
only meant to be used with `Type`, so it shouldn't be a trait.
This doesn't work properly yet, we would probably need to implement an
`assembly_neg_candidates` and consider things like `T: !AB` as `T: !A`
|| `T: !B`
Rollup of 14 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #87537 (Clarify undefined behaviour in binary heap, btree and hashset docs)
- #88624 (Stabilize feature `saturating_div` for rust 1.58.0)
- #89257 (Give better error for `macro_rules name`)
- #89665 (Ensure that pushing empty path works as before on verbatim paths)
- #89895 (Don't mark for loop iter expression as desugared)
- #89922 (Update E0637 description to mention `&` w/o an explicit lifetime name)
- #89944 (Change `Duration::[try_]from_secs_{f32, f64}` underflow error)
- #89991 (rustc_ast: Turn `MutVisitor::token_visiting_enabled` into a constant)
- #90028 (Reject closures in patterns)
- #90069 (Fix const qualification when executed after promotion)
- #90078 (Add a regression test for issue-83479)
- #90114 (Add some tests for const_generics_defaults)
- #90115 (Add test for issue #78561)
- #90129 (triagebot: Treat `I-*nominated` like `I-nominated`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
triagebot: Treat `I-*nominated` like `I-nominated`
rustbot doesn't allow unauthenticated users to set `I-nominated`; apply the same permissions to the new `I-*nominated` labels.
Add some tests for const_generics_defaults
I think this covers some of the stuff required for stabilisation report, some of these tests are probably covering stuff we already have but it can't hurt to have more :)
r? ````@lcnr````
Fix const qualification when executed after promotion
The const qualification was so far performed before the promotion and
the implementation assumed that it will never encounter a promoted.
With `const_precise_live_drops` feature, checking for live drops is
delayed until after drop elaboration, which in turn runs after
promotion. so the assumption is no longer true. When evaluating
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is now possible to encounter promoteds.
Use type base qualification for the promoted. It is a sound
approximation in general, and in the specific case of promoteds and
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is precise.
Fixes#89938.
rustc_ast: Turn `MutVisitor::token_visiting_enabled` into a constant
It's a visitor property rather than something that needs to be determined at runtime
Update E0637 description to mention `&` w/o an explicit lifetime name
Deal with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89824#issuecomment-941598647. Another solution would be splitting the error code into two as (I think) it's a bit unclear to users why they have the same error code.
Don't mark for loop iter expression as desugared
We typically don't mark spans of lowered things as desugared. This helps Clippy rightly discern when code is (not) from expansion. This was discovered by ``@flip1995`` at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/7789#issuecomment-939289501.
Stabilize feature `saturating_div` for rust 1.58.0
The tracking issue is #89381
This seems like a reasonable simple change(?). The feature `saturating_div` was added as part of the ongoing effort to implement a `Saturating` integer type (see #87921). The implementation has been discussed [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87921#issuecomment-899357720) and [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87921#discussion_r691888556). It extends the list of saturating operations on integer types (like `saturating_add`, `saturating_sub`, `saturating_mul`, ...) by the function `fn saturating_div(self, rhs: Self) -> Self`.
The stabilization of the feature `saturating_int_impl` (for the `Saturating` type) needs to have this stabilized first.
Closes#89381
Clarify undefined behaviour in binary heap, btree and hashset docs
Previously, it wasn't clear whether "This could include" was referring to logic errors, or undefined behaviour. Tweak wording to clarify this sentence does not relate to UB.
This addresses a TODO comment. The behavior of #[derive(Clone)]
*does* result in a T: Clone requirement.
Add a manual Clone implementation, matching Split and SplitInclusive.
