The idea behind requiring the label is a noble one, but we are not
really using it consistently anyway, and it should be easy to retrofit
later, should we need it.
This also changes our handiling of snippet edits on the client side.
`editor.insertSnippet` unfortunately forces indentation, which we
really don't want to have to deal with. So, let's just implement our
manual hacky way of dealing with a simple subset of snippets we
actually use in rust-analyzer
4448: Generate configuration for launch.json r=vsrs a=vsrs
This PR adds two new commands: `"rust-analyzer.debug"` and `"rust-analyzer.newDebugConfig"`. The former is a supplement to the existing `"rust-analyzer.run"` command and works the same way: asks for a runnable and starts new debug session. The latter allows adding a new configuration to **launch.json** (or to update an existing one).
If the new option `"rust-analyzer.debug.useLaunchJson"` is set to true then `"rust-analyzer.debug"` and Debug Lens will first look for existing debug configuration in **launch.json**. That is, it has become possible to specify startup arguments, env variables, etc.
`"rust-analyzer.debug.useLaunchJson"` is false by default, but it might be worth making true the default value. Personally I prefer true, but I'm not sure if it is good for all value.
----
I think that this PR also solves https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/3441.
Both methods to update launch.json mentioned in the issue do not work:
1. Menu. It is only possible to add a launch.json configuration template via a debug adapter. And anyway it's only a template and it is impossible to specify arguments from an extension.
2. DebugConfigurationProvider. The exact opposite situation: it is possible to specify all debug session settings, but it is impossible to export these settings to launch.json.
Separate `"rust-analyzer.newDebugConfig"` command looks better for me.
----
Fixes#4450Fixes#3441
Co-authored-by: vsrs <vit@conrlab.com>
Co-authored-by: vsrs <62505555+vsrs@users.noreply.github.com>
4113: Support returning non-hierarchical symbols r=matklad a=kjeremy
If `hierarchicalDocumentSymbolSupport` is not true in the client capabilites
then it does not support the `DocumentSymbol[]` return type from the
`textDocument/documentSymbol` request and we must fall back to `SymbolInformation[]`.
This is one of the few requests that use the client capabilities to
differentiate between return types and could cause problems for clients.
See https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/pull/538#issuecomment-442510767 for more context.
Found while looking at #144
4136: add support for cfg feature attributes on expression #4063 r=matklad a=bnjjj
close issue #4063
4141: Fix typo r=matklad a=Veetaha
4142: Remove unnecessary async from vscode language client creation r=matklad a=Veetaha
Co-authored-by: kjeremy <kjeremy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com>
4125: Avoid lossy OsString conversions r=matklad a=lnicola
This is a bit invasive, and perhaps for not much benefit since non-UTF-8 environment variables don't work anyway.
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
If `hierarchicalDocumentSymbolSupport` is not true in the client capabilites
then it does not support the `DocumentSymbol[]` return type from the
`textDocument/documentSymbol` request and we must fall back to `SymbolInformation[]`.
This is one of the few requests that use the client capabilities to
differentiate between return types and could cause problems for clients.
See https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/pull/538#issuecomment-442510767 for more context.
Found while looking at #144
I might be reading this wrong, but it looks like we are setting it to
essentially arbitrary string at the moment, as there are no defined
order on the items in the *set* of completions.
3954: Improve autocompletion by looking on the type and name r=matklad a=bnjjj
This tweet (https://twitter.com/tjholowaychuk/status/1248918374731714560) gaves me the idea to implement that in rust-analyzer.
Basically for this first example I made some examples when we are in a function call definition. I look on the parameter list to prioritize autocompletions for the same types and if it's the same type + the same name then it's displayed first in the completion list.
So here is a draft, first step to open a discussion and know what you think about the implementation. It works (cf tests) but maybe I can make a better implementation at some places. Be careful the code needs some refactoring to be better and concise.
PS: It was lot of fun writing this haha
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
