There may be a more efficient implementation of `core::util::swap_ptr`. The issue mentioned using `move_val_init`, but I couldn't figure out what that did, so I just used `copy_memory` a few times instead.
I'm not exactly the best at reading LLVM generated by rust, but this does appear to be optimized away just as expected (when possible).
Closes#6183.
The first commit changes the compiler's method of treating a `for` loop, and all the remaining commits are just dealing with the fallout.
The biggest fallout was the `IterBytes` trait, although it's really a whole lot nicer now because all of the `iter_bytes_XX` methods are just and-ed together. Sadly there was a huge amount of stuff that's `cfg(stage0)` gated, but whoever lands the next snapshot is going to have a lot of fun deleting all this code!
I changed ```RED_ZONE_SIZE``` to ```RZ_MAC_32``` because of stack canary failure.
Here is a LLVM patch for MIPS segmented stacks.
http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~jyyou/rust/mips-segstk.patch
Current test results
```
failures:
rand::tests::test_rng_seeded_custom_seed2
run::tests::test_forced_destroy_actually_kills
run::tests::test_unforced_destroy_actually_kills
time::tests::run_tests
uv_ll::test::test_uv_ll_struct_size_addrinfo
uv_ll::test::test_uv_ll_struct_size_uv_timer_t
segfaults:
rt::io::option::test::test_option_writer_error
rt::local_services::test::unwind
rt::sched::test_swap_tasks_then
stackwalk::test_simple
stackwalk::test_simple_deep
```
Adds an `uninit` intrinsic.
It's just an empty function, so llvm optimizes it down to nothing.
I changed all of the `init` intrinsic usages to `uninit` where it seemed appropriate to.
I removed some of the copies, but most are just made explicit. The usage in `libcore` was already fixed, but the attribute was only set to warn (not removed).
Hi there,
Really enjoying Rust. Noticed a few typos so I searched around for a few more--here's some fixes.
Ran `make check` and got `summary of 24 test runs: 4868 passed; 0 failed; 330 ignored`.
Thanks!
Sean
At the moment this only includes type checking and there is no code generation support yet. I wanted to get the design reviewed first.
From discussion with @graydon at #5841, re-implemented as `#[simd]` attribute on structs.
Progressing towards #3499.
