Fixes#16264 / #18241.
As far as I can tell, it should be impossible for a trait to be inaccessible if it's in scope, so this check is unnecessary. Are there any cases where this check is actually needed?
I assume the expected error changed during the development of pull
request #28321 and that wasn't noticed because the test was
accidentally not running.
r? @nikomatsakis
I assume the expected error changed during the development of pull
request #28321 and that wasn't noticed because the test was
accidentally not running.
[breaking-change] for lint authors
You must now implement LateLintPass or EarlyLintPass as well as LintPass and use either register_late_lint_pass or register_early_lint_pass, rather than register_lint_pass.
The second commit in this PR will stop printing the macro definition site in backtraces, which cuts their length in half and increases readability (the definition site was only correct for local macros).
The third commit will not print an invocation if the last one printed occurred at the same place (span). This will make backtraces caused by a self-recursive macro much shorter.
(A possible alternative would be to capture the backtrace first, then limit it to a few frames at the start and end of the chain and print `...` inbetween. This would also work with multiple macros calling each other, which is not addressed by this PR - although the backtrace will still be halved)
Example:
```rust
macro_rules! m {
( 0 $($t:tt)* ) => ( m!($($t)*); );
() => ( fn main() {0} );
}
m!(0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0);
```
On a semi-recent nightly, this yields:
```
test.rs:3:21: 3:22 error: mismatched types:
expected `()`,
found `_`
(expected (),
found integral variable) [E0308]
test.rs:3 () => ( fn main() {0} );
^
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: expansion site
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: expansion site
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: expansion site
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: expansion site
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: expansion site
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: expansion site
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: expansion site
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: expansion site
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: expansion site
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: expansion site
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: expansion site
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: expansion site
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: expansion site
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: expansion site
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: expansion site
test.rs:1:1: 4:2 note: in expansion of m!
test.rs:6:1: 6:35 note: expansion site
test.rs:3:21: 3:22 help: run `rustc --explain E0308` to see a detailed explanation
error: aborting due to previous error
```
After this patch:
```
test.rs:3:21: 3:22 error: mismatched types:
expected `()`,
found `_`
(expected (),
found integral variable) [E0308]
test.rs:3 () => ( fn main() {0} );
^
test.rs:2:23: 2:34 note: in this expansion of m!
test.rs:6:1: 6:35 note: in this expansion of m!
test.rs:3:21: 3:22 help: run `rustc --explain E0308` to see a detailed explanation
error: aborting due to previous error
```
