This change applies the conventions to unwrap listed in [RFC 430][rfc] to rename
non-failing `unwrap` methods to `into_inner`. This is a breaking change, but all
`unwrap` methods are retained as `#[deprecated]` for the near future. To update
code rename `unwrap` method calls to `into_inner`.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/430
[breaking-change]
cc #19091
A slice iterator is isomorphic to a slice, just with a slightly
different form: storing start and end pointers rather than start pointer
and length. This patch reflects this by making converting between them
as easy as `iter.as_slice()` (or even `iter[]` if the shorter lifetime
is ok). That is, `slice.iter().as_slice() == slice`.
r? @aturon
A slice iterator is isomorphic to a slice, just with a slightly
different form: storing start and end pointers rather than start pointer
and length. This patch reflects this by making converting between them
as easy as `iter.as_slice()` (or even `iter[]` if the shorter lifetime
is ok). That is, `slice.iter().as_slice() == slice`.
It turns out that rustrt::at_exit() doesn't actually occur after all pthread
threads have exited (nor does atexit()), so there's not actually a known point
at which we can deallocate these keys. It's not super critical that we do so,
however, because we're about to exit anyway!
Closes#19280
At the same time remove the `pub use` of the variants in favor of accessing
through the enum type itself. This is a breaking change as the `Found` and
`NotFound` variants must now be imported through `BinarySearchResult` instead of
just `std::slice`.
[breaking-change]
Closes#19272
It turns out that rustrt::at_exit() doesn't actually occur after all pthread
threads have exited (nor does atexit()), so there's not actually a known point
at which we can deallocate these keys. It's not super critical that we do so,
however, because we're about to exit anyway!
Closes#19280
"_" should keep the default syntax class (symbol, not word). This
allows, e.g., `forward-word' to behave in the familiar way, jumping to
underscores within a function or variable name.
All of the enum components had a redundant 'Type' specifier: TypeSymlink, TypeDirectory, TypeFile. This change removes them, replacing them with a namespace: FileType::Symlink, FileType::Directory, and FileType::RegularFile.
RegularFile is used instead of just File, as File by itself could be mistakenly thought of as referring to the struct.
[breaking-change]
This patch merges the `libsync` crate into `libstd`, undoing part of the
facade. This is in preparation for ultimately merging `librustrt`, as
well as the upcoming rewrite of `sync`.
Because this removes the `libsync` crate, it is a:
[breaking-change]
However, all uses of `libsync` should be able to reroute through
`std::sync` and `std::comm` instead.
Just like we do with AsSlice
This comes in handy when dealing with iterator-centric APIs (`IntoIterator`!) and you want to receive an `Iterator<S> where S: Str` argument. Without this PR, e.g. you can't receive `&["a", "b"].iter()` instead you'll have to type `&["a", "b"].iter().map(|&x| x)` (A similar thing happens with `&[String]`).
r? @aturon
Full disclaimer: I haven't run `make`/`make check` yet (All my cores are busy)
This commit removes the `std::local_data` module in favor of a new `std::thread_local`
module providing thread local storage. The module provides two variants of TLS:
one which owns its contents and one which is based on scoped references. Each
implementation has pros and cons listed in the documentation.
Both flavors have accessors through a function called `with` which yield a
reference to a closure provided. Both flavors also panic if a reference cannot
be yielded and provide a function to test whether an access would panic or not.
This is an implementation of [RFC 461][rfc] and full details can be found in
that RFC.
This is a breaking change due to the removal of the `std::local_data` module.
All users can migrate to the new tls system like so:
thread_local!(static FOO: Rc<RefCell<Option<T>>> = Rc::new(RefCell::new(None)))
The old `local_data` module inherently contained the `Rc<RefCell<Option<T>>>` as
an implementation detail which must now be explicitly stated by users.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/461
[breaking-change]
Whilst browsing the source for BinaryHeap, I saw a FIXME for implementing into_iter. I think, since the BinaryHeap is represented internally using just a Vec, just calling into_iter() on the BinaryHeap's data should be sufficient to do what we want here. If this actually isn't the right approach (e.g., I should write a struct MoveItems and appropriate implementation for BinaryHeap instead), let me know and I'll happily rework this.
Both of the tests that I have added pass. This is my first contribution to Rust, so please let me know any ways I can improve this PR!
This commit removes the `std::local_data` module in favor of a new
`std::thread_local` module providing thread local storage. The module provides
two variants of TLS: one which owns its contents and one which is based on
scoped references. Each implementation has pros and cons listed in the
documentation.
Both flavors have accessors through a function called `with` which yield a
reference to a closure provided. Both flavors also panic if a reference cannot
be yielded and provide a function to test whether an access would panic or not.
This is an implementation of [RFC 461][rfc] and full details can be found in
that RFC.
This is a breaking change due to the removal of the `std::local_data` module.
All users can migrate to the new thread local system like so:
thread_local!(static FOO: Rc<RefCell<Option<T>>> = Rc::new(RefCell::new(None)))
The old `local_data` module inherently contained the `Rc<RefCell<Option<T>>>` as
an implementation detail which must now be explicitly stated by users.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/461
[breaking-change]
A single impl supports all of `[T]`, `Vec<T>` and `CVec<T>`.
Once `Iterable` is implemented, we will prefer it to `SlicePrelude`.
But the `with_capacity()` part might become tricky.
This change applies the conventions to unwrap listed in [RFC 430][rfc] to rename
non-failing `unwrap` methods to `into_inner`. This is a breaking change, but all
`unwrap` methods are retained as `#[deprecated]` for the near future. To update
code rename `unwrap` method calls to `into_inner`.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/430
[breaking-change]
Closes#13159
cc #19091
This PR:
- makes rustdoc colour trait methods like other functions in search results;
- makes rustdoc display `extern crate` statements with the new `as` syntax instead of the old `=` syntax;
- changes rustdoc to list constants and statics in a way that is more similar to functions and modules and show their full definition and documentation on their own page, fixing #19046:
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/19077
I would appreciate any guidance on how to write a test for this. I saw some examples in `test/pretty`, but there are different ways to test... With or without `.pp` files, with a `pp-exact` comment, etc.
This breaks code like
```
let t = (42i, 42i);
... t.0::<int> ...;
```
Change this code to not contain an unused type parameter. For example:
```
let t = (42i, 42i);
... t.0 ...;
```
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/19096
[breaking-change]
r? @aturon
Catch a missed triple-slash in the docs for `std::os::args()`. Passes `make check`. (I've also eyeballed the rest of `libstd` with the aid of some funky regexes and haven't found anything similar.)
