Jorge Aparicio
7d5b0454e9
fix cfail tests
2015-01-05 17:22:17 -05:00
Richo Healey
553074506e
core: rename strbuf::StrBuf to string::String
...
[breaking-change]
2014-05-24 21:48:10 -07:00
Patrick Walton
95e310abdc
test: Remove all uses of ~str from the test suite.
2014-05-14 14:58:00 -07:00
Huon Wilson
3766453a42
rustc: move the check_loop pass earlier.
...
This pass is purely AST based, and by running it earlier we emit more
useful error messages, e.g. type inference fails in the case of `let r =
break;` with few constraints on `r`, but its more useful to be told that
the `break` is outside a loop (rather than a type error) when it is.
Closes #13292 .
2014-04-05 10:52:28 +11:00
Patrick Walton
f571e46ddb
test: Remove non-procedure uses of do from compiletest, libstd tests,
...
compile-fail tests, run-fail tests, and run-pass tests.
2013-11-26 08:25:27 -08:00
Alex Crichton
5fdbcc4020
Improve error message for breaks in blocks
...
Before it was always stated that it was a "break outside of a loop" when you
could very well be in a loop, but just in a block instead.
Closes #3064
2013-11-12 09:40:21 -08:00
Jihyun Yu
95bc9ea26d
Remove REC, change related tests/docs
2013-03-02 12:57:05 +09:00
Graydon Hoare
d1affff623
Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup.
2012-12-10 17:32:58 -08:00
Michael Sullivan
d884085f43
Tear out ty_str and ty_vec.
2012-07-14 12:19:36 -07:00
Marijn Haverbeke
87e097a853
Disallow ret inside of block functions
...
Also adds proper checking for cont/break being inside a loop.
Closes #1854
Issue #1619
2012-03-26 12:45:47 +02:00
Marijn Haverbeke
e62ddf4898
More rigorous reuse of cleanup sequences
...
In both landing pads and break/cont/ret unwinding.
Closes #300
2012-02-16 16:37:33 +01:00
Brian Anderson
518dc52f85
Reformat
...
This changes the indexing syntax from .() to [], the vector syntax from ~[] to
[] and the extension syntax from #fmt() to #fmt[]
2011-08-20 11:04:00 -07:00
Brian Anderson
c53402846e
Remove all xfail-stage0 directives
...
While it is still technically possible to test stage 0, it is not part of any
of the main testing rules and maintaining xfail-stage0 is a chore. Nobody
should worry about how tests fare in stage0.
2011-08-03 10:55:59 -07:00
Marijn Haverbeke
df7f21db09
Reformat for new syntax
2011-07-27 15:54:33 +02:00
Marijn Haverbeke
781a265b88
Remove variable name 'res' from test suite
2011-06-25 21:15:04 +02:00
Tim Chevalier
7532681612
Add xfail-stage0 to some tests (not sure if it matters...)
2011-06-14 12:27:23 -07:00
Tim Chevalier
774c6d0198
Friendlier error message for break outside a loop
...
The typechecker should really check for this, but at least now
there's an error message rather than an inexhaustive match failure
in trans.
2011-06-10 14:34:01 -07:00
