Commit Graph

10486 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Waffle Lapkin
c3d463333f Fixup clippy tests
Don't depend on the fact that `!` falls back to `()` and so panic-ish things
can be used in `-> impl ImplementedForUnit` functions
2024-06-13 12:24:31 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
35f54fd439 Rollup merge of #126159 - RalfJung:scalarint-size-mismatch, r=oli-obk
ScalarInt: size mismatches are a bug, do not delay the panic

Cc [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/146212-t-compiler.2Fconst-eval/topic/Why.20are.20ScalarInt.20to.20iN.2FuN.20methods.20fallible.3F)

r? ``@oli-obk``
2024-06-10 21:12:25 +02:00
Ralf Jung
8c1f953772 ScalarInt: size mismatches are a bug, do not delay the panic 2024-06-10 13:43:16 +02:00
clubby789
5acc25e700 Update icu4x dependencies 2024-06-09 07:47:42 +01:00
León Orell Valerian Liehr
fe6f332193 Rollup merge of #125951 - slanterns:error_in_core_stabilization, r=Amanieu
Stabilize `error_in_core`

Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103765.

`@rustbot` label: +T-libs-api

r? libs-api
2024-06-08 04:25:44 +02:00
bors
127f3e18c1 Auto merge of #125918 - oli-obk:const_block_ice, r=compiler-errors
Revert: create const block bodies in typeck via query feeding

as per the discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/125806#discussion_r1622563948

It was a mistake to try to shoehorn const blocks and some specific anon consts into the same box and feed them during typeck. It turned out not simplifying anything (my hope was that we could feed `type_of` to start avoiding the huge HIR matcher, but that didn't work out), but instead making a few things more fragile.

reverts the const-block-specific parts of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/124650

`@bors` rollup=never had a small perf impact previously

fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125846

r? `@compiler-errors`
2024-06-07 09:08:59 +00:00
Oli Scherer
abd011638d Revert "Create const block DefIds in typeck instead of ast lowering"
This reverts commit ddc5f9b6c1.
2024-06-07 08:33:58 +00:00
Jubilee
3e43cfcf24 Rollup merge of #126101 - lqd:revert-124099, r=wesleywiser
Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly

As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR #124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions #125199.

r? ``@wesleywiser``

Opening as draft so that ``@wesleywiser`` and ``@apiraino,`` you can tell me whether you wanted:
1. a `beta-accepted` revert of #124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though #126093 may be the last of those)
2. a revert of #124099 on beta?
3. all of the above?

I also opened #126102, another draft PR to revert #124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
2024-06-06 21:10:11 -07:00
Slanterns
246d4fe791 bless std_instead_of_core 2024-06-07 08:37:05 +08:00
Rémy Rakic
5ea5f6351e Revert "Rollup merge of #124099 - voidc:disallow-ambiguous-expr-attrs, r=davidtwco"
This reverts commit 57dad1d75e, reversing
changes made to 36316df9fe.
2024-06-06 20:39:54 +00:00
bors
16fcbd21e5 Auto merge of #126068 - lqd:revert-124976, r=petrochenkov
Revert "use `tcx.used_crates(())` more" before it reaches beta

There are more open issues caused by #124976 than will be fixed by #125493 alone. The beta cut is soon, so let's revert it and buy some time to analyze and fix these issues in our own time.

fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125474
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125484
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125646
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125707
fixes #126066
fixes #125934
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126021

r? `@petrochenkov`
`@bors` p=1
2024-06-06 20:18:43 +00:00
Rémy Rakic
c245cde61c Revert "Rollup merge of #124976 - petrochenkov:usedcrates, r=oli-obk"
This reverts commit eda4a35f36, reversing
changes made to eb6b35b5bc.
2024-06-06 10:06:28 +00:00
bors
ea13653f6f Auto merge of #124482 - spastorino:unsafe-extern-blocks, r=oli-obk
Unsafe extern blocks

This implements RFC 3484.

Tracking issue #123743 and RFC https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3484

This is better reviewed commit by commit.
2024-06-06 08:14:58 +00:00
Boxy
38de6e1f3a Misc fixes to cranelift/clippy/miri 2024-06-05 22:25:42 +01:00
Nicholas Nethercote
e8d02fe1cb Make top-level rustc_parse functions fallible.
Currently we have an awkward mix of fallible and infallible functions:
```
       new_parser_from_source_str
 maybe_new_parser_from_source_str
       new_parser_from_file
(maybe_new_parser_from_file)        // missing
      (new_parser_from_source_file) // missing
 maybe_new_parser_from_source_file
       source_str_to_stream
 maybe_source_file_to_stream
```
We could add the two missing functions, but instead this commit removes
of all the infallible ones and renames the fallible ones leaving us with
these which are all fallible:
```
new_parser_from_source_str
new_parser_from_file
new_parser_from_source_file
source_str_to_stream
source_file_to_stream
```
This requires making `unwrap_or_emit_fatal` public so callers of
formerly infallible functions can still work.

This does make some of the call sites slightly more verbose, but I think
it's worth it for the simpler API. Also, there are two `catch_unwind`
calls and one `catch_fatal_errors` call in this diff that become
removable thanks this change. (I will do that in a follow-up PR.)
2024-06-05 10:38:03 +10:00
Santiago Pastorino
bd0f908242 Add safe/unsafe to static inside extern blocks 2024-06-04 14:19:43 -03:00
Santiago Pastorino
537ce5c8c6 Handle safety keyword for extern block inner items 2024-06-04 14:19:42 -03:00
Michael Goulet
9f4a2dd147 Align Term methods with GenericArg methods 2024-06-03 20:36:27 -04:00
Michael Goulet
e94779a396 Opt-in diagnostics reporting to avoid doing extra work in the new solver 2024-06-03 09:27:52 -04:00
bors
ab45660c75 Auto merge of #125775 - compiler-errors:uplift-closure-args, r=lcnr
Uplift `{Closure,Coroutine,CoroutineClosure}Args` and friends to `rustc_type_ir`

Part of converting the new solver's `structural_traits.rs` to be interner-agnostic.

I decided against aliasing `ClosureArgs<TyCtxt<'tcx>>` to `ClosureArgs<'tcx>` because it seemed so rare. I could do so if desired, though.

r? lcnr
2024-06-01 19:07:03 +00:00
Michael Goulet
5a44877a39 Uplift TypeRelation and Relate 2024-06-01 12:50:58 -04:00
Mark Rousskov
2334264463 Deduplicate supertrait_def_ids code 2024-06-01 07:50:32 -04:00
Matthias Krüger
febfa5157c Rollup merge of #125635 - fmease:mv-type-binding-assoc-item-constraint, r=compiler-errors
Rename HIR `TypeBinding` to `AssocItemConstraint` and related cleanup

Rename `hir::TypeBinding` and `ast::AssocConstraint` to `AssocItemConstraint` and update all items and locals using the old terminology.

Motivation: The terminology *type binding* is extremely outdated. "Type bindings" not only include constraints on associated *types* but also on associated *constants* (feature `associated_const_equality`) and on RPITITs of associated *functions* (feature `return_type_notation`). Hence the word *item* in the new name. Furthermore, the word *binding* commonly refers to a mapping from a binder/identifier to a "value" for some definition of "value". Its use in "type binding" made sense when equality constraints (e.g., `AssocTy = Ty`) were the only kind of associated item constraint. Nowadays however, we also have *associated type bounds* (e.g., `AssocTy: Bound`) for which the term *binding* doesn't make sense.

---

Old terminology (HIR, rustdoc):

```
`TypeBinding`: (associated) type binding
├── `Constraint`: associated type bound
└── `Equality`: (associated) equality constraint (?)
    ├── `Ty`: (associated) type binding
    └── `Const`: associated const equality (constraint)
```

Old terminology (AST, abbrev.):

```
`AssocConstraint`
├── `Bound`
└── `Equality`
    ├── `Ty`
    └── `Const`
```

New terminology (AST, HIR, rustdoc):

```
`AssocItemConstraint`: associated item constraint
├── `Bound`: associated type bound
└── `Equality`: associated item equality constraint OR associated item binding (for short)
    ├── `Ty`: associated type equality constraint OR associated type binding (for short)
    └── `Const`: associated const equality constraint OR associated const binding (for short)
```

r? compiler-errors
2024-05-31 08:50:22 +02:00
León Orell Valerian Liehr
040edea332 Rename HIR TypeBinding to AssocItemConstraint and related cleanup 2024-05-30 22:52:33 +02:00
bors
51347ba3c7 Auto merge of #125764 - flip1995:clippy-subtree-update, r=Manishearth
Clippy subtree update

r? `@Manishearth`
2024-05-30 16:46:31 +00:00
bors
b7a6c2d339 Auto merge of #125761 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-7u082og, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #125342 (Document platform-specifics for `Read` and `Write` of `File`)
 - #125711 (Make `body_owned_by` return the `Body` instead of just the `BodyId`)
 - #125739 (drop_in_place: weaken the claim of equivalence with drop(ptr.read()))
 - #125745 (Bump the stage0 compiler to beta.7 (2024-05-26))
 - #125746 (Fix copy-paste error in `Duration::from_weeks` panic message.)
 - #125753 (compiletest: Unify `cmd2procres` with `run_command_to_procres`)
 - #125754 (coverage: Rename MC/DC `conditions_num` to `num_conditions`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2024-05-30 10:09:30 +00:00
Philipp Krones
f67f72695a Merge commit 'c9139bd546d9cd69df817faeab62c5f9b1a51337' into clippy-subtree-update 2024-05-30 10:49:05 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
e2e5731be2 Rollup merge of #125711 - oli-obk:const_block_ice2, r=Nadrieril
Make `body_owned_by` return the `Body` instead of just the `BodyId`

fixes #125677

Almost all `body_owned_by` callers immediately called `body`, too, so just return `Body` directly.

This makes the inline-const query feeding more robust, as all calls to `body_owned_by` will now yield a body for inline consts, too.

I have not yet figured out a good way to make `tcx.hir().body()` return an inline-const body, but that can be done as a follow-up
2024-05-30 10:23:07 +02:00
bors
8299d4947a Auto merge of #125711 - oli-obk:const_block_ice2, r=Nadrieril
Make `body_owned_by` return the `Body` instead of just the `BodyId`

fixes #125677

Almost all `body_owned_by` callers immediately called `body`, too, so just return `Body` directly.

This makes the inline-const query feeding more robust, as all calls to `body_owned_by` will now yield a body for inline consts, too.

I have not yet figured out a good way to make `tcx.hir().body()` return an inline-const body, but that can be done as a follow-up
2024-05-30 08:00:11 +00:00
Vadim Petrochenkov
d38920f677 ast: Revert a breaking attribute visiting order change 2024-05-29 21:55:24 +03:00
bors
bda7427621 Auto merge of #125360 - RalfJung:packed-field-reorder, r=fmease
don't inhibit random field reordering on repr(packed(1))

`inhibit_struct_field_reordering_opt` being false means we exclude this type from random field shuffling. However, `packed(1)` types can still be shuffled! The logic was added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48528 since it's pointless to reorder fields in packed(1) types (there's no padding that could be saved) -- but that shouldn't inhibit `-Zrandomize-layout` (which did not exist at the time).

We could add an optimization elsewhere to not bother sorting the fields for `repr(packed)` types, but I don't think that's worth the effort.

This *does* change the behavior in that we may now reorder fields of `packed(1)` structs (e.g. if there are niches, we'll try to move them to the start/end, according to `NicheBias`).  We were always allowed to do that but so far we didn't. Quoting the [reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/type-layout.html):

> On their own, align and packed do not provide guarantees about the order of fields in the layout of a struct or the layout of an enum variant, although they may be combined with representations (such as C) which do provide such guarantees.
2024-05-29 11:57:13 +00:00
Oli Scherer
f44a6a7cb5 Make body_owned_by return the body directly.
Almost all callers want this anyway, and now we can use it to also return fed bodies
2024-05-29 10:04:08 +00:00
Oli Scherer
7f66e567b2 Don't require visit_body to take a lifetime that must outlive the function call 2024-05-29 10:04:08 +00:00
Oli Scherer
e3e27ba3dd Create const block DefIds in typeck instead of ast lowering 2024-05-28 13:38:43 +00:00
bors
4dd07f4e4e Auto merge of #125410 - fmease:adj-lint-diag-api, r=nnethercote
[perf] Delay the construction of early lint diag structs

Attacks some of the perf regressions from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/124417#issuecomment-2123700666.

See individual commits for details. The first three commits are not strictly necessary.
However, the 2nd one (06bc4fc671, *Remove `LintDiagnostic::msg`*) makes the main change way nicer to implement.
It's also pretty sweet on its own if I may say so myself.
2024-05-27 08:44:12 +00:00
bors
8f23de1f4a Auto merge of #125468 - BoxyUwU:remove_defid_from_regionparam, r=compiler-errors
Remove `DefId` from `EarlyParamRegion`

Currently we represent usages of `Region` parameters via the `ReEarlyParam` or `ReLateParam` variants. The `ReEarlyParam` is effectively equivalent to `TyKind::Param` and `ConstKind::Param` (i.e. it stores a `Symbol` and a `u32` index) however it also stores a `DefId` for the definition of the lifetime parameter.

This was used in roughly two places:
- Borrowck diagnostics instead of threading the appropriate `body_id` down to relevant locations. Interestingly there were already some places that had to pass down a `DefId` manually.
- Some opaque type checking logic was using the `DefId` field to track captured lifetimes

I've split this PR up into a commit for generate rote changes to diagnostics code to pass around a `DefId` manually everywhere, and another commit for the opaque type related changes which likely require more careful review as they might change the semantics of lints/errors.

Instead of manually passing the `DefId` around everywhere I previously tried to bundle it in with `TypeErrCtxt` but ran into issues with some call sites of `infcx.err_ctxt` being unable to provide a `DefId`, particularly places involved with trait solving and normalization. It might be worth investigating adding some new wrapper type to pass this around everywhere but I think this might be acceptable for now.

This pr also has the effect of reducing the size of `EarlyParamRegion` from 16 bytes -> 8 bytes. I wouldn't expect this to have any direct performance improvement however, other variants of `RegionKind` over `8` bytes are all because they contain a `BoundRegionKind` which is, as far as I know, mostly there for diagnostics. If we're ever able to remove this it would shrink the `RegionKind` type from `24` bytes to `12` (and with clever bit packing we might be able to get it to `8` bytes). I am curious what the performance impact would be of removing interning of `Region`'s if we ever manage to shrink `RegionKind` that much.

Sidenote: by removing the `DefId` the `Debug` output for `Region` has gotten significantly nicer. As an example see this opaque type debug print before vs after this PR:
`Opaque(DefId(0:13 ~ impl_trait_captures[aeb9]::foo::{opaque#0}), [DefId(0:9 ~ impl_trait_captures[aeb9]::foo::'a)_'a/#0, T, DefId(0:9 ~ impl_trait_captures[aeb9]::foo::'a)_'a/#0])`
`Opaque(DefId(0:13 ~ impl_trait_captures[aeb9]::foo::{opaque#0}), ['a/#0, T, 'a/#0])`

r? `@compiler-errors` (I would like someone who understands the opaque type setup to atleast review the type system commit, but the rest is likely reviewable by anyone)
2024-05-27 06:36:57 +00:00
Boxy
714e172ef2 Remove DefId from EarlyParamRegion (clippy/smir) 2024-05-24 18:06:57 +01:00
León Orell Valerian Liehr
0c653d9f91 Remove LintDiagnostic::msg
* instead simply set the primary message inside the lint decorator functions
* it used to be this way before [#]101986 which introduced `msg` to prevent
  good path delayed bugs (which no longer exist) from firing under certain
  circumstances when lints were suppressed / silenced
* this is no longer necessary for various reasons I presume
* it shaves off complexity and makes further changes easier to implement
2024-05-23 04:08:35 +02:00
Vadim Petrochenkov
765baba165 rustc: Use tcx.used_crates(()) more
And explain when it should be used.
2024-05-22 18:02:51 +03:00
Philipp Krones
4363278c73 Merge commit '2efebd2f0c03dabbe5c3ad7b4ebfbd99238d1fb2' into clippy-subtree-update 2024-05-21 10:39:30 -07:00
Ralf Jung
a14ca6005c don't inhibit random field reordering on repr(packed(1)) 2024-05-21 19:22:04 +02:00
Michael Goulet
ca1337a7bc Remove a clippy test that doesn't apply anymore 2024-05-20 19:21:38 -04:00
Matthias Krüger
acf38f8466 Rollup merge of #125173 - scottmcm:never-checked, r=davidtwco
Remove `Rvalue::CheckedBinaryOp`

Zulip conversation: <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/189540-t-compiler.2Fwg-mir-opt/topic/intrinsics.20vs.20binop.2Funop/near/438729996>
cc `@RalfJung`

While it's a draft,
r? ghost
2024-05-20 18:13:48 +02:00
bors
298f38c06e Auto merge of #125294 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-w42c829, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #124948 (chore: Remove repeated words (extension of #124924))
 - #124992 (Add example to IsTerminal::is_terminal)
 - #125279 (make `Debug` impl for `Term` simpler)
 - #125286 (Miri subtree update)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2024-05-19 21:30:43 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
647f222885 Rollup merge of #124948 - blyxyas:remove-repeated-words, r=compiler-errors
chore: Remove repeated words (extension of #124924)

When I saw #124924 I thought "Hey, I'm sure that there are far more than just two typos of this nature in the codebase". So here's some more typo-fixing.

Some found with regex, some found with a spellchecker. Every single one manually reviewed by me (along with hundreds of false negatives by the tools)
2024-05-19 22:50:55 +02:00
Santiago Pastorino
23e8b03f00 Add and use generics.is_empty() and generics.is_own_empty, rather than using generics' attributes 2024-05-19 11:10:56 -03:00
bors
37dfd973b7 Auto merge of #125077 - spastorino:add-new-fnsafety-enum2, r=jackh726
Rename Unsafe to Safety

Alternative to #124455, which is to just have one Safety enum to use everywhere, this opens the posibility of adding `ast::Safety::Safe` that's useful for unsafe extern blocks.

This leaves us today with:

```rust
enum ast::Safety {
    Unsafe(Span),
    Default,
    // Safe (going to be added for unsafe extern blocks)
}

enum hir::Safety {
    Unsafe,
    Safe,
}
```

We would convert from `ast::Safety::Default` into the right Safety level according the context.
2024-05-18 19:35:24 +00:00
blyxyas
ae547e3000 Fix typos (taking into account review comments) 2024-05-18 18:12:18 +02:00
Scott McMurray
0cd64b5756 Fix clippy 2024-05-17 20:33:02 -07:00
Santiago Pastorino
0590d71ce2 Rename Unsafe to Safety 2024-05-17 18:33:37 -03:00