fix: don't replace `SyntaxToken` with `SyntaxNode`
Fixes#14339
When we inline method calls, we replace the `self` parameter with a local variable `this`. We have been replacing the `self` **tokens** with `NameRef` **nodes**, which makes the AST malformed. This leads to crash when we apply path transformation after the replacement (which only takes place when the method is generic and such scenario was not tested).
14 commits in 7d3033d2e59383fd76193daf9423c3d141972a7d..4a3c588b1f0a8e2dc8dd8789dbf3b6a71b02ed49
2023-03-08 17:05:08 +0000 to 2023-03-14 14:05:36 +0000
- ci: make clean-test-output a script for reuse (rust-lang/cargo#11848)
- Accurately show status when downgrading dependencies (rust-lang/cargo#11839)
- docs(contrib): Move Design Principles earlier in the book (rust-lang/cargo#11842)
- docs(contrib): Point compilation docs to doc comments (rust-lang/cargo#11841)
- `cargo install --git` multiple packages with binaries found hint (rust-lang/cargo#11835)
- Disable flaky auth tests when `gitoxide` runs them (rust-lang/cargo#11830)
- Add some documentation on writing cross-compilation tests (rust-lang/cargo#11825)
- chore: Use sparse protocol on stable CI (rust-lang/cargo#11829)
- Notice for potential unexpected shell expansions in help text of `cargo-add` (rust-lang/cargo#11826)
- Add tracking issue to gitoxide unstable docs (rust-lang/cargo#11822)
- Bump crates-io to 0.36.0 (rust-lang/cargo#11820)
- Bump to 0.71.0; update changelog (rust-lang/cargo#11815)
- docs(contrib): Move overview to lib (rust-lang/cargo#11809)
- Fix semver check for 1.68 (rust-lang/cargo#11817)
Instead of building two kinds of drop pair loops, of which only one will
be eventually used at runtime in a given monomorphization, always use
index based loop.
Add Cargo-style project discovery for Buck and Bazel Users
This feature requires the user to add a command that generates a `rust-project.json` from a set of files. Project discovery can be invoked in two ways:
1. At extension activation time, which includes the generated `rust-project.json` as part of the linkedProjects argument in `InitializeParams`.
2. Through a new command titled "rust-analyzer: Add current file to workspace", which makes use of a new, rust-analyzer-specific LSP request that adds the workspace without erasing any existing workspaces. Note that there is no mechanism to _remove_ workspaces other than "quit the rust-analyzer server".
Few notes:
- I think that the command-running functionality _could_ merit being placed into its own extension (and expose it via extension contribution points) to provide build-system idiomatic progress reporting and status handling, but I haven't (yet) made an extension that does this nor does Buck expose this sort of functionality.
- This approach would _just work_ for Bazel. I'll try and get the tool that's responsible for Buck integration open-sourced soon.
- On the testing side of things, I've used this in around my employer's Buck-powered monorepo and it's a nice experience. That being said, I can't think of an open-source repository where this can be tested in public, so you might need to trust me on this one.
I'd love to get feedback on:
- Naming of LSP extensions/new commands. I'm not too pleased with how "rust-analyzer: Add current file to workspace" is named, in that it's creating a _new_ workspace. I think that this command being added should be gated on `rust-analyzer.discoverProjectCommand` on being set, so I can add this in sequent commits.
- My Typescript. It's not particularly good.
- Suggestions on handling folders with _both_ Cargo and non-Cargo build systems and if I make activation a bit better.
(I previously tried to add this functionality entirely within rust-analyzer-the-LSP server itself, but matklad was right—an extension side approach is much, much easier.)
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108722 (Support for Fuchsia RISC-V target)
- #108880 (Remove tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/new-lowering-strategy in favor of using revisions on existing tests)
- #108909 (Fix object safety checks for new RPITITs)
- #108915 (Remove some direct calls to local_def_id_to_hir_id on diagnostics)
- #108923 (Make fns from other crates with RPITIT work for -Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty)
- #109101 (Fall back to old metadata computation when type references errors)
- #109105 (Don't ICE for late-bound consts across `AnonConstBoundary`)
- #109110 (Don't codegen impossible to satisfy impls)
- #109116 (Emit diagnostic when calling methods on the unit type in method chains)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Emit diagnostic when calling methods on the unit type in method chains
Fixes#104204.
What this PR does: If a method is not found somewhere in a call chain, we check if we called earlier a method with signature `(&mut T, ...) -> ()`. If this is the case then we emit a diagnostic message.
For example given input:
```
vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter().collect::<Vec<i32>>().sort_by_key(|i| i).sort();
```
the current output is:
```
error[E0599]: no method named `sort` found for unit type `()` in the current scope
--> hello.rs:3:72
|
3 | vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter().collect::<Vec<i32>>().sort_by_key(|i| i).sort();
| ^^^^ method not found in `()`
```
after this PR it will be:
```
error[E0599]: no method named `sort` found for unit type `()` in the current scope
--> ./hello.rs:3:72
|
3 | vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter().collect::<Vec<i32>>().sort_by_key(|i| i).sort();
| ^^^^ method not found in `()`
|
note: method `sort_by_key` modifies its receiver in-place, it is not meant to be used in method chains.
--> ./hello.rs:3:53
|
3 | vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter().collect::<Vec<i32>>().sort_by_key(|i| i).sort();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ this call modifies its receiver in-place
```
