Recover `impl<T ?Sized>` correctly
Fixes#111327
r? ````@Nilstrieb```` but you can re-roll
Alternatively, happy to close this if we're okay with just saying "sorry #111327 is just a poor side-effect of parser ambiguity" 🤷
Error message all end up passing into a function as an `impl
Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>`. If an error message is creatd as
`&format("...")` that means we allocate a string (in the `format!`
call), then take a reference, and then clone (allocating again) the
reference to produce the `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage`, which is silly.
This commit removes the leading `&` from a lot of these cases. This
means the original `String` is moved into the
`{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage`, avoiding the double allocations. This
requires changing some function argument types from `&str` to `String`
(when all arguments are `String`) or `impl
Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>` (when some arguments are `String` and
some are `&str`).
Get current target config from` --print=cfg`
Compiletest was switched to querying all targets using `--print=all-target-specs-json` and `--print=target-spec-json` in #108905. This unintentionally prevented codegen flags like `-Cpanic` from being reflected in the current target configuration. This change gets the current compiletest target config using `--print=cfg` like it was previously while still using the faster prints for getting information on all other targets.
Fixes#110850.
`@jyn514` might be interested in reviewing since they commented on the issue.
cc `@tmandry` since this issue is affecting Fuchsia.
Combine three generalizer implementations
Fixes#111092Fixes#109505
This code is a bit delicate and there were subtle changes between them, so I'll leave inline comments where further inspection is needed.
Regarding this comment from #109813 -- "add tests triggering all codepaths: at least the combine and the const generalizer", can't really do that now, and I don't really know how we'd get a higher-ranked const error since non-lifetime binders doesn't *really* support `for<const ..>` (it errors out when you try to use it).
r? `@lcnr`
Remove misleading target feature aliases
Fixes#100752. This is a follow up to #103750. These aliases could not be completely removed until rust-lang/stdarch#1355 landed.
cc `@Amanieu`
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108291 (Fix more benchmark test with black_box)
- #108356 (improve doc test for UnsafeCell::raw_get)
- #110049 (Don't claim `LocalKey::with` prevents a reference to be sent across threads)
- #111525 (Stop checking for the absence of something that doesn't exist)
- #111538 (Make sure the build.rustc version is either the same or 1 apart)
- #111578 (Move expansion of query macros in rustc_middle to rustc_middle::query)
- #111584 (Number lexing tweaks)
- #111587 (Custom MIR: Support `Rvalue::CopyForDeref`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Move expansion of query macros in rustc_middle to rustc_middle::query
This moves the expansion of `define_callbacks!` and `define_feedable!` from `rustc_middle::ty::query` to `rustc_middle::query`.
This means that types used in queries are both imported and used in `rustc_middle::query` instead of being split between these modules. It also decouples `rustc_middle::ty::query` further from `rustc_middle` which is helpful since we want to move `rustc_middle::ty::query` to the query system crates.
Stop checking for the absence of something that doesn't exist
A couple of codegen tests are doing
```
// CHECK-NOT: slice_index_len_fail
```
However, that function no longer exists: [the only places](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Arust-lang%2Frust+slice_index_len_fail&type=code) it occurs in the repo are in those tests.
So this PR updates the tests to check for the absense of the functions that are actually used today to panic for out-of-bounds indexing.
Don't claim `LocalKey::with` prevents a reference to be sent across threads
The documentation for `LocalKey` claims that `with` yields a reference that cannot be sent across threads, but this is false since you can easily do that with scoped threads. What it actually prevents is the reference from outliving the current thread.
