7904: Improved completion sorting r=JoshMcguigan a=JoshMcguigan
I was working on extending #3954 to apply completion scores in more places (I'll have another PR open for that soon) when I discovered that actually completion sorting was not working for me at all in `coc.nvim`. This led me down a bit of a rabbit hole of how coc and vs code each sort completion items.
Before this PR, rust-analyzer was setting the `sortText` field on completion items to `None` if we hadn't applied any completion score for that item, or to the label of the item with a leading whitespace character if we had applied any completion score. Completion score is defined in rust-analyzer as an enum with two variants, `TypeMatch` and `TypeAndNameMatch`.
In vs code the above strategy works, because if `sortText` isn't set [they default it to the label](b4ead4ed66). However, coc [does not do this](e211e36147/src/completion/complete.ts (L245)).
I was going to file a bug report against coc, but I read the [LSP spec for the `sortText` field](https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specifications/specification-current/#textDocument_completion) and I feel like it is ambiguous and coc could claim what they do is a valid interpretation of the spec.
Further, the existing rust-analyzer behavior of prepending a leading whitespace character for completion items with any completion score does not handle sorting `TypeAndNameMatch` completions above `TypeMatch` completions. They were both being treated the same.
The first change this PR makes is to set the `sortText` field to either "1" for `TypeAndNameMatch` completions, "2" for `TypeMatch` completions, or "3" for completions which are neither of those. This change works around the potential ambiguity in the LSP spec and fixes completion sorting for users of coc. It also allows `TypeAndNameMatch` items to be sorted above just `TypeMatch` items (of course both of these will be sorted above completion items without a score).
The second change this PR makes is to use the actual completion scores for ref matches. The existing code ignored the actual score and always assumed these would be a high priority completion item.
#### Before
Here coc just sorts based on how close the items are in the file.
#### After
Here we correctly get `zzz` first, since that is both a type and name match. Then we get `ccc` which is just a type match.
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
7961: add user docs for ssr assist r=JoshMcguigan a=JoshMcguigan
@matklad
This is a small follow up on #7874, adding user docs for the SSR assist functionality. Since most other assists aren't handled this way I wasn't sure exactly how we wanted to document this, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
6822: Read version of rustc that compiled proc macro r=edwin0cheng a=jsomedon
Signed-off-by: Jay Somedon <jay.somedon@outlook.com>
This PR is to fix#6174.
I basically
* added two methods, `read_version` and `read_section`(used by `read_version`)
* two new crates `snap` and `object` to be used by those two methods
I just noticed that some part of code were auto-reformatted by rust-analyzer on file save. Does it matter?
Co-authored-by: Jay Somedon <jay.somedon@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
7878: Remove `item_scope` field from `Body` r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/7632
Instead of storing an `ItemScope` filled with inner items, we store the list of `BlockId`s for all block expressions that are part of a `Body`. Code can then query the `block_def_map` for those.
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
7873: Consider unresolved qualifiers during flyimport r=matklad a=SomeoneToIgnore
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/7679
Takes unresolved qualifiers into account, providing better completions (or none, if the path is resolved or do not match).
Does not handle cases when both path qualifier and some trait has to be imported: there are many extra issues with those (such as overlapping imports, for instance) that will require large diffs to address.
Also does not do a fuzzy search on qualifier, that requires some adjustments in `import_map` for better queries and changes to the default replace range which also seems relatively big to include here.
7933: Improve compilation speed r=matklad a=matklad
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
7898: generate_function assist: infer return type r=JoshMcguigan a=JoshMcguigan
This PR makes two changes to the generate function assist:
1. Attempt to infer an appropriate return type for the generated function
2. If a return type is inferred, and that return type is not unit, don't render the snippet
```rust
fn main() {
let x: u32 = foo$0();
// ^^^ trigger the assist to generate this function
}
// BEFORE
fn foo() ${0:-> ()} {
todo!()
}
// AFTER (only change 1)
fn foo() ${0:-> u32} {
todo!()
}
// AFTER (change 1 and 2, note the lack of snippet around the return type)
fn foo() -> u32 {
todo!()
}
```
These changes are made as two commits, in case we want to omit change 2. I personally feel like it is a nice change, but I could understand there being some opposition.
#### Pros of change 2
If we are able to infer a return type, and especially if that return type is not the unit type, the return type is almost as likely to be correct as the argument names/types. I think this becomes even more true as people learn how this feature works.
#### Cons of change 2
We could never be as confident about the return type as we are about the function argument types, so it is more likely a user will want to change that. Plus it is a confusing UX to sometimes have the cursor highlight the return type after triggering this assist and sometimes not have that happen.
#### Why omit unit type?
The assumption is that if we infer the return type as unit, it is likely just because of the current structure of the code rather than that actually being the desired return type. However, this is obviously just a heuristic and will sometimes be wrong. But being wrong here just means falling back to the exact behavior that existed before this PR.
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
7891: Improve handling of rustc_private r=matklad a=DJMcNab
This PR changes how `rust-analyzer` handles `rustc_private`. In particular, packages now must opt-in to using `rustc_private` in `Cargo.toml`, by adding:
```toml
[package.metadata.rust-analyzer]
rustc_private=true
```
This means that depending on crates which also use `rustc_private` will be significantly improved, since their dependencies on the `rustc_private` crates will be resolved properly.
A similar approach could be used in #6714 to allow annotating that your package uses the `test` crate, although I have not yet handled that in this PR.
Additionally, we now only index the crates which are transitive dependencies of `rustc_driver` in the `rustcSource` directory. This should not cause any change in behaviour when using `rustcSource: "discover"`, as the source used then will only be a partial clone. However, if `rustcSource` pointing at a local checkout of rustc, this should significantly improve the memory usage and lower indexing time. This is because we avoids indexing all crates in `src/tools/`, which includes `rust-analyzer` itself.
Furthermore, we also prefer named dependencies over dependencies from `rustcSource`. This ensures that feature resolution for crates which are depended on by both `rustc` and your crate uses the correct set for analysing your crate.
See also [introductory zulip stream](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Fwg-rls-2.2E0/topic/Fixed.20crate.20graphs.20and.20optional.20builtin.20crates/near/229086673)
I have tested this in [priroda](https://github.com/oli-obk/priroda/), and it provides a significant improvement to the development experience (once I give `miri` the required data in `Cargo.toml`)
Todo:
- [ ] Documentation
This is ready to review, and I will add documentation if this would be accepted (or if I get time to do so anyway)
Co-authored-by: Daniel McNab <36049421+DJMcNab@users.noreply.github.com>
7892: Fix TokenStream::from_str for input consisting of a single group with delimiter r=edwin0cheng a=kevinmehall
TokenStream holds a `tt::Subtree` but assumes its `delimiter` is always `None`. In particular, the iterator implementation iterates over the inner `token_trees` and ignores the `delimiter`.
However, `TokenStream::from_str` violated this assumption when the input consists of a single group by producing a Subtree with an outer delimiter, which was ignored as seen by a procedural macro.
`tt::Subtree` is just `pub delimiter: Option<Delimiter>, pub token_trees: Vec<TokenTree>`, so a Subtree that is statically guaranteed not to have a delimiter is just `Vec<TokenTree>`.
Fixes#7810Fixes#7875
Co-authored-by: Kevin Mehall <km@kevinmehall.net>
7865: preserve escape sequences when replacing string with char r=Veykril a=jDomantas
Currently it replaces escape sequence with the actual value, which is very wrong for `"\n"`.
Co-authored-by: Domantas Jadenkus <djadenkus@gmail.com>
`TokenStream` assumes that its subtree's delimeter is `None`, and this
should be encoded in the type system instead of having a delimiter field
that is mostly ignored.
`tt::Subtree` is just `pub delimiter: Option<Delimiter>, pub
token_trees: Vec<TokenTree>`, so a Subtree that is statically guaranteed
not to have a delimiter is just Vec<TokenTree>.
TokenStream holds a `tt::Subtree` but assumes its `delimiter` is always
`None`. In particular, the iterator implementation iterates over the
inner `token_trees` and ignores the `delimiter`.
However, `TokenStream::from_str` violated this assumption when the input
consists of a single Group by producing a Subtree with an outer
delimiter, which was ignored as seen by a procedural macro.
In this case, wrap an extra level of Subtree around it.
Fixes#7810Fixes#7875
This is a hack to work around miri being included in
our analysis of rustc-dev
Really, we should probably use an include set of the actual root libraries
I'm not sure how those are determined however
7880: Honor snippet capability when using the extract function assist r=lnicola a=Arthamys
This fixes issue #7793
Co-authored-by: san <san@alien.parts>
7870: Use chalk_ir::AdtId r=Veykril a=Veykril
It's a bit unfortunate that we got two AdtId's now(technically 3 with the alias in the chalk module but that one won't allow pattern matching), one from hir_def and one from chalk_ir(hir_ty). But the hir_ty/chalk one doesn't leave hir so it shouldn't be that bad I suppose. Though if I see this right this will happen for almost all IDs.
I imagine most of the intermediate changes to using chalk ids will turn out not too nice until the refactor is over.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
