Fixes: #79725
Some macros can create a situation where `fn_sig_span` and `body_span`
map to different files.
New documentation on coverage tests incorrectly assumed multiple test
binaries could just be listed at the end of the `llvm-cov` command,
but it turns out each binary needs a `--object` prefix.
This PR fixes the bug and updates the documentation to correct that
issue. It also fixes a few other minor issues in internal implementation
comments, and adds documentation on getting coverage results for doc
tests.
Use `summary_opts()` in another spot
I added `summary_opts()` before I cut the branch for #77686 (2 months
ago!), so this "slipped through the cracks".
Validate naked functions definitions
Validate that naked functions are defined in terms of a single inline assembly
block that uses only `const` and `sym` operands and has `noreturn` option.
Implemented as future incompatibility lint with intention to migrate it into
hard error. When it becomes a hard error it will ensure that naked functions are
either unsafe or contain an unsafe block around the inline assembly. It will
guarantee that naked functions do not reference functions parameters (obsoleting
part of existing checks from #79411). It will limit the definitions of naked
functions to what can be reliably supported. It will also reject naked functions
implemented using legacy LLVM style assembly since it cannot satisfy those
conditions.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2774https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2972
Fix SGX CI, take 3
Broken in #79038
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
I actually ran `./x.py test --target x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx` on the commit before submitting it this time.
Update Clippy
Biweekly Clippy update (which I forgot about on Thursday)
This includes a `Cargo.lock` update, so probably needs `rollup=never`.
r? `@Manishearth`
extend `WithOptConstParam` docs, move rustdoc test
This should hopefully make things a bit clearer, feel free to comment on anything which can still be improved.
cc `@ecstatic-morse` `@nikomatsakis` `@RalfJung`
Const parameters can not be inferred with `_` help note
This should close: #79557
# Example output
```
error[E0747]: type provided when a constant was expected
--> inferred_const_note.rs:6:19
|
6 | let a = foo::<_, 2>([0, 1, 2]);
| ^
|
= help: Const parameters can not be inferred with `_`
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0747`.
```
r? `@lcnr`
Added a lint-fraction-readability flag to the configuration
This adds an option to disable the `unreadable_literal` lint for floats with a longer fraction. This allows users to write `0.100200300` without getting a warning. Fixes#4176
I have some open questions about this PR:
1. I've named the option `lint-fraction-readability` is this a good name or should I rename it to something else?
2. What should the default configuration value be?
* The current default value is `true` as this was also the previous default.
3. Do I have to document this new option somewhere else or will it be extracted from the code comment?
4. The current fix option will also rewrite the fraction if the integer part violates the `unreadable_literal` lint it would otherwise also trigger the `inconsistent_digit_grouping` lint. Is this also okay?
* `1.100200300` will be unaffected by the fix function
* `100200300.100200300` will be effected and fixed to `100_200_300.100_200_300`
---
The project needed some getting used to but I'm happy with the result. A big thank you to `@flip1995` for giving me some pointers for this implementation and to everyone for the great introduction documentation!
---
changelog: Added the `unreadable-literal-lint-fractions` configuration to disable the `unreadable_literal` lint for fractions
Update RLS and Rustfmt
Fixes#79406Fixes#79407
This does pull 1.4.28 version of Rustfmt. Do you want me to pull the 1.4.29 while we're at it?
r? `@calebcartwright`
Fix incorrect io::Take's limit resulting from io::copy specialization
The specialization introduced in #75272 fails to update `io::Take` wrappers after performing the copy syscalls which bypass those wrappers. The buffer flushing before the copy does update them correctly, but the bytes copied after the initial flush weren't subtracted.
The fix is to subtract the bytes copied from each `Take` in the chain of wrappers, even when an error occurs during the syscall loop. To do so the `CopyResult` enum now has to carry the bytes copied so far in the error case.
