Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #114376 (Avoid exporting __rust_alloc_error_handler_should_panic more than once.)
- #114413 (Warn when #[macro_export] is applied on decl macros)
- #114497 (Revert #98333 "Re-enable atomic loads and stores for all RISC-V targets")
- #114500 (Remove arm crypto target feature)
- #114566 (Store the laziness of type aliases in their `DefKind`)
- #114594 (Structurally normalize weak and inherent in new solver)
- #114596 (Rename method in `opt-dist`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rename method in `opt-dist`
This makes it clearer that the LLVM is the host one (it doesn't necessarily have to be downloaded). On Linux, it comes from the Dockerfile, on Windows it's downloaded.
Suggested here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114344#discussion_r1285596217
r? `@lqd`
Store the laziness of type aliases in their `DefKind`
Previously, we would treat paths referring to type aliases as *lazy* type aliases if the current crate had lazy type aliases enabled independently of whether the crate which the alias was defined in had the feature enabled or not.
With this PR, the laziness of a type alias depends on the crate it is defined in. This generally makes more sense to me especially if / once lazy type aliases become the default in a new edition and we need to think about *edition interoperability*:
Consider the hypothetical case where the dependency crate has an older edition (and thus eager type aliases), it exports a type alias with bounds & a where-clause (which are void but technically valid), the dependent crate has the latest edition (and thus lazy type aliases) and it uses that type alias. Arguably, the bounds should *not* be checked since at any time, the dependency crate should be allowed to change the bounds at will with a *non*-major version bump & without negatively affecting downstream crates.
As for the reverse case (dependency: lazy type aliases, dependent: eager type aliases), I guess it rules out anything from slight confusion to mild annoyance from upstream crate authors that would be caused by the compiler ignoring the bounds of their type aliases in downstream crates with older editions.
---
This fixes#114468 since before, my assumption that the type alias associated with a given weak projection was lazy (and therefore had its variances computed) did not necessarily hold in cross-crate scenarios (which [I kinda had a hunch about](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114253#discussion_r1278608099)) as outlined above. Now it does hold.
`@rustbot` label F-lazy_type_alias
r? `@oli-obk`
Structurally normalize weak and inherent in new solver
It seems pretty obvious to me that we should be normalizing weak and inherent aliases too, since they can always be normalized. This PR still leaves open the question of what to do with opaques, though 💀
**Also**, we need to structurally resolve the target of a coercion, for the UI test to work.
r? `@lcnr`
Store the laziness of type aliases in their `DefKind`
Previously, we would treat paths referring to type aliases as *lazy* type aliases if the current crate had lazy type aliases enabled independently of whether the crate which the alias was defined in had the feature enabled or not.
With this PR, the laziness of a type alias depends on the crate it is defined in. This generally makes more sense to me especially if / once lazy type aliases become the default in a new edition and we need to think about *edition interoperability*:
Consider the hypothetical case where the dependency crate has an older edition (and thus eager type aliases), it exports a type alias with bounds & a where-clause (which are void but technically valid), the dependent crate has the latest edition (and thus lazy type aliases) and it uses that type alias. Arguably, the bounds should *not* be checked since at any time, the dependency crate should be allowed to change the bounds at will with a *non*-major version bump & without negatively affecting downstream crates.
As for the reverse case (dependency: lazy type aliases, dependent: eager type aliases), I guess it rules out anything from slight confusion to mild annoyance from upstream crate authors that would be caused by the compiler ignoring the bounds of their type aliases in downstream crates with older editions.
---
This fixes#114468 since before, my assumption that the type alias associated with a given weak projection was lazy (and therefore had its variances computed) did not necessarily hold in cross-crate scenarios (which [I kinda had a hunch about](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114253#discussion_r1278608099)) as outlined above. Now it does hold.
`@rustbot` label F-lazy_type_alias
r? `@oli-obk`
Remove arm crypto target feature
Follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/pull/1407.
LLVM has moved away from a combined `crypto` feature on both aarch64 and arm, and we did the same on aarch64, but were deferred from doing the same on arm due to compatibility with older LLVM.
As the minimum LLVM version has increased, we can now remove this (unstable) target feature on arm.
r? `@Amanieu`
Warn when #[macro_export] is applied on decl macros
The existing code checks if `#[macro_export]` is being applied to an item other than a macro, and warns in that case, but fails to take into account macros 2.0/decl macros, despite the attribute having no effect on these macros.
This PR adds a special case for decl macros with the aforementioned attribute, so that the warning is a bit more precise. Instead of just saying "this attribute has no effect", hint towards the fact that decl macros get exported and resolved like regular items.
It also removes a `#[macro_export]` attribute which was applied on one of `core`'s decl macros.
- core: Remove #[macro_export] from `debug_assert_matches`
- check_attrs: Warn when #[macro_export] is used on macros 2.0
Avoid exporting __rust_alloc_error_handler_should_panic more than once.
Exporting `__rust_alloc_error_handler_should_panic` multiple times causes `ld.gold` to balk with: `error: version script assignment of to symbol __rust_alloc_error_handler_should_panic failed: symbol not defined`
Specifically this breaks builds of 1.70.0 and newer on DragonFly and YoctoProject with `ld.gold`. Builds with `ld.bfd` and `lld` should be unaffected.
http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/708194/
Fix#90546 by filtering out global value function pointer types from the
type tests, and adding the LowerTypeTests pass to the rustc LTO
optimization pipelines.
Update to LLVM 17
Expected LLVM 17.0.0 release date: Sep 5th
Rust 1.73 release date: Oct 5th
Compatibility changes in this PR:
- Drop LLVM_RUSTLLVM check for target-cpu table, which no longer requires a patch with LLVM 17.
- Update powerpc data layouts, which now include function alignment information. As usual, downgrade for older LLVM versions.
- Adjust the stack-protector.rs test so that the stack smashing does not get optimized away.
- Adjust path of crtbegin.c and crtend.c in compiler-rt.
- Updated dist-riscv64-linux to use binutils 2.36 in order to recognize the zicsr feature, which is no longer part of the base ISA.
- Fixed symlink for asm include directory on dist-various-2. We should use `/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/asm` for the host, rather than `/usr/include/asm-generic`.
Upstream patches:
- [x] https://reviews.llvm.org/D156525 (backported)
Perf run: https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=f239bb6bea94d16d902c36d72b5cabdddefb3cab&end=8030d71a95a3ea79f5fc95232c32f9b78effb92d&stat=instructions:uFixes#109671.
Successful: dist-x86_64-linux, dist-aarch64-linux, dist-s390x-linux, dist-powerpc-linux, armhf-gnu, wasm32
The compiler should emit a more specific error when the `#[macro_export]`
attribute is present on a decl macro, instead of silently ignoring it.
This commit adds the required error message in rustc_passes/messages.ftl,
as well as a note. A new variant is added to the `errors::MacroExport`
enum, specifically for the case where the attribute is added to a macro
2.0.
The `debug_assert_matches` macro was marked with the `#[macro_export]` attribute,
despite being a declarative macro/macro 2.0, for which the exporting rules are similar
to items. In fact, `#[macro_export]` on a decl macro has no effect on its visibility.
We should symlink /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/asm for the host
triple, rather than /usr/include/asm-generic, which is used in the
implementation for asm for specific triple, but shouldn't be used
by itself.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #113568 (Fix spurious test failure with `panic=abort`)
- #114196 (Bubble up nested goals from equation in `predicates_for_object_candidate`)
- #114485 (Add trait decls to SMIR)
- #114495 (Set max_atomic_width for AVR to 16)
- #114496 (Set max_atomic_width for sparc-unknown-linux-gnu to 32)
- #114510 (llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API changes)
- #114562 (stabilize abi_thiscall)
- #114570 ([miri][typo] Fix a typo in a vector_block comment.)
- #114573 (CI: do not hide error logs in a group)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
CI: do not hide error logs in a group
This PR avoids creating a GHA group at the very end of a CI workflow when some failure has happened. Before, when a failure has happened, its GHA group was not closed, however the clock drift check function would create a new group, which would actually close the group containing the error log, thus making errors hidden by default, which is not ideal.
See discussion here: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/GHA.20groups.20being.20closed.20on.20failures
r? bootstrap
Bubble up nested goals from equation in `predicates_for_object_candidate`
This used to be needed for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114036#discussion_r1273987510, but since it's no longer, I'm opening this as a separate PR. This also fixes one ICEing UI test: (`tests/ui/unboxed-closures/issue-53448.rs`)
r? `@lcnr`
Make `unconditional_recursion` warning detect recursive drops
Closes#55388
Also closes#50049 unless we want to keep it for the second example which this PR does not solve, but I think it is better to track that work in #57965.
r? `@oli-obk` since you are the mentor for #55388
Unresolved questions:
- [x] There are two false positives that must be fixed before merging (see diff). I suspect the best way to solve them is to perform analysis after drop elaboration instead of before, as now, but I have not explored that any further yet. Could that be an option? **Answer:** Yes, that solved the problem.
`@rustbot` label +T-compiler +C-enhancement +A-lint
