Optimize `array::IntoIter`
`.into_iter()` on arrays was slower than it needed to be (especially compared to slice iterator) since it uses `Range<usize>`, which needs to handle degenerate ranges like `10..4`.
This PR adds an internal `IndexRange` type that's like `Range<usize>` but with a safety invariant that means it doesn't need to worry about those cases -- it only handles `start <= end` -- and thus can give LLVM more information to optimize better.
I added one simple demonstration of the improvement as a codegen test.
(`vec::IntoIter` uses pointers instead of indexes, so doesn't have this problem, but that only works because its elements are boxed. `array::IntoIter` can't use pointers because that would keep it from being movable.)
`.into_iter()` on arrays was slower than it needed to be (especially compared to slice iterator) since it uses `Range<usize>`, which needs to handle degenerate ranges like `10..4`.
This PR adds an internal `IndexRange` type that's like `Range<usize>` but with a safety invariant that means it doesn't need to worry about those cases -- it only handles `start <= end` -- and thus can give LLVM more information to optimize better.
I added one simple demonstration of the improvement as a codegen test.
Make `from_waker`, `waker` and `from_raw` unstably `const`
Make
- `Context::from_waker`
- `Context::waker`
- `Waker::from_raw`
`const`.
Also added a small test.
Tone down explanation on RefCell::get_mut
The language around `RefCell::get_mut` is remarkably sketchy and especially to the novice seems to quite strongly discourage using the method ("be cautious", "Also, please be aware", "special circumstances", "usually not what you want"). It was added six years ago in #40634 due to confusion about when to use `get_mut` and `borrow_mut`.
While its signature limits the use-cases for `get_mut`, there is no chance for a safety footgun, and readers can be made aware of `borrow_mut` more softly. I've also just sent a [PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9044) to lint situations where `get_mut` could be used to improve ergonomics and performance.
So this PR tones down the language around `get_mut` and also brings it more in line with [`std::sync::Mutex::get_mut()`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/sync/struct.Mutex.html#method.get_mut).
array docs - advertise how to get array from slice
On my first Rust project, I spent more time than I care to admit figuring out how to efficiently get an array from a slice. Update the array documentation to explain this a bit more clearly.
(As a side note, it's a bit unfortunate that get-array-from-slice is only available via trait since that means it can't be used from const functions yet.)
Constify impl Fn* &(mut) Fn*
Tracking Issue: [101803](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101803)
Feature gate: `#![feature(const_fn_trait_ref_impls)]`
This feature allows using references to Fn* Items as Fn* Items themself in a const context.
Fix naming format of IEEE 754 standard
Currently the documentation of f64::min refers to "IEEE-754 2008" while the documentation of f64::minimum refers to "IEEE 754-2019".
Note that one has the format IEEE,hyphen,number,space,year while the other is IEEE,space,number,hyphen,year. The official IEEE site [1] uses the later format and it is also the one most commonly used throughout the codebase.
Update all comments and - more importantly - documentation to consistently use the official format.
[1] https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/754/4211/
On my first Rust project, I spent more time than I care to admit
figuring out how to efficiently get an array from a slice. Update the
array documentation to explain this a bit more clearly.
(As a side note, it's a bit unfortunate that get-array-from-slice is
only available via trait since that means it can't be used from const
functions yet.)
Currently the documentation of f64::min refers to "IEEE-754 2008" while the documentation of
f64::minimum refers to "IEEE 754-2019".
Note that one has the format IEEE,hyphen,number,space,year while the other is
IEEE,space,number,hyphen,year. The official IEEE site [1] uses the later format and it is also the
one most commonly used throughout the codebase.
Update all comments and - more importantly - documentation to consistently use the official format.
[1] https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/754/4211/
The `<*const T>::guaranteed_*` methods now return an option for the unknown case
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53020#issuecomment-1236932443
I chose `0` for "not equal" and `1` for "equal" and left `2` for the unknown case so backends can just forward to raw pointer equality and it works ✨
r? `@fee1-dead` or `@lcnr`
cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
Fix the example code and doctest for Formatter::sign_plus
The provided example to the `sign_plus` method on `fmt` was broken, it displays the `-` sign twice for negative numbers.
This pull request should fix the issue by `.abs()` ing the number so that the negative sign appears only once. It is just one possible solution to the issue, not sure if it's the best. However, this one will behave as expected when combined with fill and alignment operators.
Compile spin_loop_hint as pause on x86 even without sse2 enabled
The x86 `pause` instruction was introduced with sse2, but because it is encoded as `rep nop`, it works just fine on cpu's without sse2 support. It just doesn't do anything.
Tweak future opaque ty pretty printing
1. The `Return` type of a generator doesn't need to be a lang item just for diagnostic printing of types
2. We shouldn't suppress the `Output = Ty` of a opaque future if the type is a int or float var.
Reimplement `carrying_add` and `borrowing_sub` for signed integers.
As per the discussion in #85532, this PR reimplements `carrying_add` and `borrowing_sub` for signed integers.
It also adds unit tests for both unsigned and signed integers, emphasing on the behaviours of the methods.
The x86 `pause` instruction was introduced with sse2, but because it is encoded as `rep nop`, it works just fine on cpu's without sse2 support. It just doesn't do anything.
Document eager evaluation of `bool::then_some` argument
I encountered this earlier today and thought maybe `bool::then_some` could use a little addition to the documentation.
It's pretty obvious with familiarity and from looking at the implementation, but the argument for `then_some` is eagerly evaluated, which means if you do the following (as I did), you can have a problem:
```rust
// Oops!
let _ = something
.has_another_thing()
.then_some(something.another_thing_or_panic());
```
A note, similar to other methods with eagerly-evaluated arguments and a lazy alternative (`Option::or`, for example), could help point this out to people who forget (like me)!
Make `const_eval_select` a real intrinsic
This fixes issues where `track_caller` functions do not have nice panic
messages anymore when there is a call to the function, and uses the
MIR system to replace the call instead of dispatching via lang items.
Fixes#100696.
