Deal with unnormalized projections when structurally resolving types with new solver
1. Normalize types in `structurally_resolved_type` when the new solver is enabled
2. Normalize built-in autoderef targets in `Autoderef` when the new solver is enabled
3. Normalize-erasing-regions in `resolve_type` in writeback
This is motivated by the UI test provided, which currently fails with:
```
error[E0609]: no field `x` on type `<usize as SliceIndex<[Foo]>>::Output`
--> <source>:9:11
|
9 | xs[0].x = 1;
| ^
```
I'm pretty happy with the approach in (1.) and (2.) and think we'll inevitably need something like this in the long-term, but (3.) seems like a hack to me. It's a *lot* of work to add tons of new calls to every user of these typeck results though (mir build, late lints, etc). Happy to discuss further.
r? `@lcnr`
This was added to control percentage sizes, in
79956b96e8
Now, the only percentage size is [`border-radius`], which is
based on the size of the box itself, not its containing block.
This leaves the property unused.
[`border-radius`]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/border-radius
Give better error when collecting into `&[T]`
The detection of slice reference of `{integral}` in `rustc_on_unimplemented` is hacky, but a proper solution requires changing `FmtPrinter` to add a parameter to print integers as `{integral}` and I didn't want to change it just for `rustc_on_unimplemented`. I can do that if requested, though.
I'm open to better wording; this is the best I could come up with.
Mark internal functions and traits unsafe to reflect preconditions
No semantics are changed in this PR; I only mark some functions and and a trait `unsafe` which already had implicit preconditions. Although it seems somewhat redundant for `numfmt::Part::Copy` to contain a `&[u8]` instead of a `&str`, given that all of its current consumers ultimately expect valid UTF-8. Is the type also intended to work for byte-slice formatting in the future?
fix recursion depth handling after confirmation
fixes#111729
I think having to use `Obligation::with_depth` correctly everywhere is very hard because e.g. the nested obligations from `eq` currently do not have the correct obligation depth.
The new solver [completely removes `recursion_depth` from obligations](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/traits/solve/struct.Goal.html) and instead tracks the depth in the solver itself which is far easier to get right. Moving the old solver towards this shouldn't be that hard but is probably somewhat annoying.
r? `@matthewjasper`
Fix duplicate `arcinner_layout_for_value_layout` calls when using the uninit `Arc` constructors
What this fixes is the duplicate calls to `arcinner_layout_for_value_layout` seen here: https://godbolt.org/z/jr5Gxozhj
The issue was discovered alongside #111603 but is otherwise unrelated to the duplicate `alloca`s, which remain unsolved. Everything I tried to solve said main issue has failed.
As for the duplicate layout calculations, I also tried slapping `#[inline]` and `#[inline(always)]` on everything in sight but the only thing that worked in the end is to dedup the calls by hand.
Rather than returning an array of features from to_llvm_features, return a structure that contains
the dependencies. This also contains metadata on how the features depend on each other to allow for
the correct enabling and disabling.
Some features that are tied together only make sense to be folded
together when enabling the feature. For example on AArch64 sve and
neon are tied together, however it doesn't make sense to disable neon
when disabling sve.
In #91608 the fp-armv8 feature was removed as it's tied to the neon
feature. However disabling neon didn't actually disable the use of
floating point registers and instructions, for this `-fp-armv8` is
required.
Add extra debug assertions for equality for Adt/Variant/FieldDef
Would've made it easier to both catch and test https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111494. Maybe not worth it, since it does mean that the compiler is doing extra work when debug-assertions are enabled, but also that's what debug assertions are for :^)
This is a revival of #111523 because I think I pushed an empty branch and bors got a bit too excited it closed the PR.
Document `Pin` memory layout
The fact that `Pin` is `#[repr(transparent)]` technically isn't documented anywhere currently. I don't see any reason why `Pin`'s layout would ever change, so this PR codifies it.
`@rustbot` label +T-libs-api -T-libs +A-docs +A-layout +A-pin
Render test messages from bootstrap
Bootstrap was not rendering messages from the test harness when a test failed. This can include messages like "test did not panic as expected". This fixes it by making sure those messages are printed on failure.
Fixes#111825
Don't use inner macro in `marker_impls`
Just recurse instead of having to define an inner macro to avoid the problem with expansion binders being misnumbered between the `$meta` and `$T` variables.
cc `@Veykril` this should fixrust-lang/rust-analyzer#14862 since we've gotten rid of the inner macro.
rustdoc: include strikethrough in item summary
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111822. Since **bold** and *italic* are included, I don't see why ~~strikethrough~~ shouldn't be.
Since this only affects `PreCodegen MIR, and it would be nice for that to be resilient to permutations of things that don't affect the actual semantic behaviours.
