The following are unstable:
- core::int, i8, i16, i32, i64
- core::uint, u8, u16, u32, u64
- core::int::{BITS, BYTES, MIN, MAX}, etc.
- std::int, i8, i16, i32, i64
- std::uint, u8, u16, u32, u64
The following are experimental:
- std::from_str::FromStr and impls - may need to return Result instead of Option
- std::int::parse_bytes, etc. - ditto
- std::num::FromStrRadix and impls - ditto
- std::num::from_str_radix - ditto
The following are deprecated:
- std::num::ToStrRadix and imples - Wrapper around fmt::radix. Wrong name (Str vs String)
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/wiki/Meeting-API-review-2014-06-23#uint
The following are tagged 'unstable'
- core::clone
- Clone
- Clone::clone
- impl Clone for Arc
- impl Clone for arc::Weak
- impl Clone for Rc
- impl Clone for rc::Weak
- impl Clone for Vec
- impl Clone for Cell
- impl Clone for RefCell
- impl Clone for small tuples
The following are tagged 'experimental'
- Clone::clone_from - may not provide enough utility
- impls for various extern "Rust" fns - may not handle lifetimes correctly
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/wiki/Meeting-API-review-2014-06-23#clone
In line with what @brson, @cmr, @nikomatsakis and I discussed this morning, my
redux of the tutorial will be implemented as the Guide. This way, I can work in
small iterations, rather than dropping a huge PR, which is hard to review. In
addition, the community can observe my work as I'm doing it.
This adds a note in line with [this comment][reddit] that clarifies the state
of the tutorial, and the community's involvement with it.
[reddit]: http://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/28bew8/rusts_documentation_is_about_to_drastically/ci9c98k
It was previously assumed that the object file generated by LLVM would always
require the __morestack function, but that assumption appears to be incorrect,
as outlined in #15108. This commit forcibly tells the linker to include the
entire archive, regardless of whether it's currently necessary or not.
Closes#15108
The #14869 removed `TraitStore` from `ty_trait` and represented trait
reference as regular `ty_rptr`. An old bug of the missing constraint
upon lifetime parameter of trait reference then is fixed as a side
effect. Adds tests for affected bugs and closes them.
Closes#12470.
Closes#14285.
This breaks a fair amount of code. The typical patterns are:
* `for _ in range(0, 10)`: change to `for _ in range(0u, 10)`;
* `println!("{}", 3)`: change to `println!("{}", 3i)`;
* `[1, 2, 3].len()`: change to `[1i, 2, 3].len()`.
RFC #30. Closes#6023.
[breaking-change]
This adds an implementation of Add for String where the rhs is <S: Str>. The
other half of adding strings is where the lhs is <S: Str>, but coherence and
the libcore separation currently prevent that.
The f128 type has very little support in the compiler and the feature is
basically unusable today. Supporting half-baked features in the compiler can be
detrimental to the long-term development of the compiler, and hence this feature
is being removed.
This is a rebase of #14804 with two new commits on top to implement and test lint plugins.
r? @alexcrichton @huonw: Can you take a look at the new commits, and also weigh in about any issues from the old PR that you feel are still unresolved? I'm leaving the old branch alone to preserve discussion history.
Also change some code formatting.
lint::builtin becomes a sibling of lint::context in order to ensure that lints
implemented there use the same public API as lint plugins.
The immediate benefits are
* moving the state specific to a single lint out of Context, and
* replacing the soup of function calls in the Visitor impl with
more structured control flow
But this is also a step towards loadable lints.
We're going to have more modules under lint, and the paths get unwieldy. We
also plan to have lints run at multiple points in the compilation pipeline.
It was accidentally removed in #15006 and that somehow got past the
build bots, causing `src/test/run-make/c-dynamic-dylib` to fail on at
least my linux system.
This resolves#15103 (thanks to @alexcrichton!).
The aim of these changes is not working out a generic bi-endianness architectures support but to allow people develop for little endian MIPS machines (issue #7190).
Includes a bit more comments than usual for a regression test; I felt like documenting Niko's diagnosis of the original problem here.
Fix#15111
r? anyone.
