Port books to mdbook
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/39588
blocked on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/39431
As a first step towards the bookshelf, we ~vendor mdbook in-tree and~ port our books to it. Eventually, both of these books will be moved out-of-tree, but the nightly book will rely on doing the same thing. As such, this intermediate step is useful.
r? @alexcrichton @brson
/cc @azerupi
tidy: exempt URLs from the line length restriction
The length of a URL is usually not under our control, and Markdown
provides no way to split a URL in the middle. Therefore, comment
lines consisting _solely_ of a URL (possibly with a Markdown link
label in front) should be exempt from the line-length restriction.
Inline hyperlink destinations ( `[foo](http://...)` notation ) are
_not_ exempt, because it is my arrogant opinion that long lines of
that type make the source text illegible.
The patch adds dependencies on the `regex` and `lazy_static` crates
to the tidy utility. This _appears_ to Just Work, but if you would
rather not have that dependency I am willing to provide a hand-written
parser instead.
Adding compile fail test for staged_api feature
Issue #39059
r? @est31
@est31 running the tests for this feature fails. Is that expected since this is the `compile-fail`suite?
I copied this test from the run-pass suite: `rust/src/test/run-pass/reachable-unnameable-type-alias.rs`. What are the differences between these suites in operation and why they are used?
travis: Add builders without assertions
This commit adds three new builders, one OSX, one Linux, and one MSVC, which
will produce "nightlies" with LLVM assertions disabled. Currently all nightly
releases have LLVM assertions enabled to catch bugs before they reach the
beta/stable channels. The beta/stable channels, however, do not have LLVM
assertions enabled.
Unfortunately though projects like Servo are stuck on nightlies for the near
future at least and are also suffering very long compile times. The purpose of
this commit is to provide artifacts to these projects which are not distributed
through normal channels (e.g. rustup) but are provided for developers to use
locally if need be.
Logistically these builds will all be uploaded to `rustc-builds-alt` instead of
the `rustc-builds` folder of the `rust-lang-ci` bucket. These builds will stay
there forever (until cleaned out if necessary) and there are no plans to
integrate this with rustup and/or the official release process.
Add equivalents of C's <ctype.h> functions to AsciiExt.
* `is_ascii_alphabetic`
* `is_ascii_uppercase`
* `is_ascii_lowercase`
* `is_ascii_alphanumeric`
* `is_ascii_digit`
* `is_ascii_hexdigit`
* `is_ascii_punctuation`
* `is_ascii_graphic`
* `is_ascii_whitespace`
* `is_ascii_control`
This addresses issue #39658.
Lightly tested on x86-64-linux. tidy complains about the URLs in the documentation making lines too long, I don't know what to do about that.
Automate vendoring by invoking cargo-vendor when building src dist tarballs.
This avoids #39633 bringing the `src/vendor` checked into git by #37524, past 200,000 lines of code.
I believe the strategy of having rustbuild run `cargo vendor` during the `dist src` step is sound.
However, the only way to be sure `cargo-vendor` exists is to run `cargo install --force cargo-vendor`, which will recompile it every time (not passing `--force` means you can't tell between "already exists" and "build error"). ~~This is quite suboptimal and I'd like to somehow do it in each `Dockerfile` that would need it.~~
* [ ] Cache `CARGO_HOME` (i.e. `~/.cargo`) between CI runs
* `bin/cargo-vendor` and the actual caches are the relevant bits
* [x] Do not build `cargo-vendor` all the time
* ~~Maybe detect `~/.cargo/bin/cargo-vendor` already exists?~~
* ~~Could also try to build it in a `Dockerfile` but do we have `cargo`/`rustc` there?~~
* Final solution: check `cargo install --list` for a line starting with `cargo-vendor `
cc @rust-lang/tools
Add PartialOrd, Ord derivations to TypeId
I want to be able to sort a `Vec` of types which contain `TypeId`s, so an `Ord` derivation would be very useful to me. `Hash` and `PartialEq`/`Eq` already exist, so the missing `PartialOrd` and `Ord` derivations feel like an oversight to me.
Add intrinsics & target features for rd{rand,seed}
One question is whether or not we want to map feature name `rdrnd` to `rdrand` instead.
EDIT: as for use case, I would like to port my rdrand crate from inline assembly to these intrinsics.
mdbook has a lot of optional dependencies that we don't want, so instead
of using it directly, we re-build rustbook to use mdbook as a library.
For convenience' sake, we keep the same CLI interface as mdbook; the
only difference is that it only accepts build and test subcommands,
rather than the full range.
The length of a URL is usually not under our control, and Markdown
provides no way to split a URL in the middle. Therefore, comment
lines consisting _solely_ of a URL (possibly with a Markdown link
label in front) should be exempt from the line-length restriction.
Inline hyperlink destinations ( `[foo](http://...)` notation ) are
_not_ exempt, because it is my arrogant opinion that long lines of
that type make the source text illegible.
The patch adds dependencies on the `regex` and `lazy_static` crates
to the tidy utility. This _appears_ to Just Work, but if you would
rather not have that dependency I am willing to provide a hand-written
parser instead.
add solaris rustbuild support
Add Solaris as recognized ostype
Add cputype recognition for Solaris
Fixes#39729
A future pull request will discriminate between the commercial release and older opensource derivatives to account for divergence, for now, this is compatible with both.
[MIR] SwitchInt Everywhere
Something I've been meaning to do for a very long while. This PR essentially gets rid of 3 kinds of conditional branching and only keeps the most general one - `SwitchInt`. Primary benefits are such that dealing with MIR now does not involve dealing with 3 different ways to do conditional control flow. On the other hand, constructing a `SwitchInt` currently requires more code than what previously was necessary to build an equivalent `If` terminator. Something trivially "fixable" with some constructor methods somewhere (MIR needs stuff like that badly in general).
Some timings (tl;dr: slightly faster^1 (unexpected), but also uses slightly more memory at peak (expected)):
^1: Not sure if the speed benefits are because of LLVM liking the generated code better or the compiler itself getting compiled better. Either way, its a net benefit. The CORE and SYNTAX timings done for compilation without optimisation.
```
AFTER:
Building stage1 std artifacts (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 31.50 secs
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 31.42 secs
Building stage1 compiler artifacts (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 439.56 secs
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 435.15 secs
CORE: 99% (24.81 real, 0.13 kernel, 24.57 user); 358536k resident
CORE: 99% (24.56 real, 0.15 kernel, 24.36 user); 359168k resident
SYNTAX: 99% (49.98 real, 0.48 kernel, 49.42 user); 653416k resident
SYNTAX: 99% (50.07 real, 0.58 kernel, 49.43 user); 653604k resident
BEFORE:
Building stage1 std artifacts (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 31.84 secs
Building stage1 compiler artifacts (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Finished release [optimized] target(s) in 451.17 secs
CORE: 99% (24.66 real, 0.20 kernel, 24.38 user); 351096k resident
CORE: 99% (24.36 real, 0.17 kernel, 24.18 user); 352284k resident
SYNTAX: 99% (52.24 real, 0.56 kernel, 51.66 user); 645544k resident
SYNTAX: 99% (51.55 real, 0.48 kernel, 50.99 user); 646428k resident
```
cc @nikomatsakis @eddyb
macros: fix inert attributes from `proc_macro_derives` with `#![feature(proc_macro)]`
This PR refactors collection of `proc_macro_derive` invocations to fix#39347.
After this PR, the input to a `#[proc_macro_derive]` function no longer sees `#[derive]`s on the underlying item. For example, consider:
```rust
extern crate my_derives;
use my_derives::{Trait, Trait2};
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
#[derive(Trait)]
#[derive(Trait2)]
struct S;
```
Today, the input to the `Trait` derive is `#[derive(Copy, Clone, Trait2)] struct S;`, and the input to the `Trait2` derive is `#[derive(Copy, Clone)] struct S;`. More generally, a `proc_macro_derive` sees all builtin derives, as well as all `proc_macro_derive`s listed *after* the one being invoked.
After this PR, both `Trait` and `Trait2` will see `struct S;`.
This is a [breaking-change], but I believe it is highly unlikely to cause breakage in practice.
r? @nrc
