Do not consider elaborated projection predicates for objects in new solver
Object types have projection bounds which are elaborated during astconv. There's no need to do it again for projection goals, since that'll give us duplicate projection candidatesd that are distinct up to regions due to the fact that we canonicalize every region to a separate variable. See quick example below the break for a better explanation.
Discussed this with lcnr, and adding a stop-gap until we get something like intersection region constraints (or modify canonicalization to canonicalize identical regions to the same canonical regions) -- after which, this will hopefully not matter and may be removed.
r? `@lcnr`
---
See `tests/ui/traits/new-solver/more-object-bound.rs`:
Consider a goal: `<dyn Iter<'a, ()> as Iterator>::Item = &'a ()`.
After canonicalization: `<dyn Iter<'!0r, (), Item = '!1r ()> as Iterator>::Item == &!'2r ()`
* First object candidate comes from the item bound in the dyn's bounds itself, giving us `<dyn Iter<'!0r, (), Item = '?!r ()> as Iterator>::Item == &!'1r ()`. This gives us one region constraint: `!'1r == !'2r`.
* Second object candidate comes from elaborating the principal trait ref, gives us `<dyn Iter<'!0r, (), Item = '!1r ()> as Iterator>::Item == &!'0r ()`. This gives us one region constraint: `!'0r == !'2r`.
* Oops! Ambiguity!
Use random `HashMap` keys on Hermit
Initializing the keys with random data provided by the libOS avoids HashDOS attacks and similar issues.
CC `@stlankes`
Support TLS access into dylibs on Windows
This allows access to `#[thread_local]` in upstream dylibs on Windows by introducing a MIR shim to return the address of the thread local. Accesses that go into an upstream dylib will call the MIR shim to get the address of it.
`convert_tls_rvalues` is introduced in `rustc_codegen_ssa` which rewrites MIR TLS accesses to dummy calls which are replaced with calls to the MIR shims when the dummy calls are lowered to backend calls.
A new `dll_tls_export` target option enables this behavior with a `false` value which is set for Windows platforms.
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84933.
Make init mask lazy for fully initialized/uninitialized const allocations
There are a few optimization opportunities in the `InitMask` and related const `Allocation`s (e.g. by taking advantage of the fact that it's a bitset that represents initialization, which is often entirely initialized or uninitialized in a single call, or gradually built up, etc).
There's a few overwrites to the same state, multiple writes in a row to the same indices, the RLE scheme for `memcpy` doesn't always compress, etc.
Here, we start with:
- avoiding materializing the bitset's blocks if the allocation is fully initialized/uninitialized
- dealloc blocks when fully overwriting, including when participating in `memcpy`s
- take care of the fixme about allocating blocks of 0s before overwriting them to the expected value
- expanding unit test coverage of the init mask
This should be most visible on benchmarks and crates where const allocations dominate the runtime (like `ctfe-stress-5` of course), but I was especially looking at the worst cases from #93215.
This first change allows the majority of `set_range` calls to stay with a lazy init mask when bootstrapping rustc (not that the init mask is a big part of the process in cpu time or memory usage).
r? `@oli-obk`
I have another in-progress branch where I'll switch the singular initialized/uninitialized value to a watermark, recording the point after which everything is uninitialized. That will take care of cases where full initialization is monotonic and done in multiple steps (e.g. an array of a type without padding), which should then allow the vast majority of const allocations' init masks to stay lazy during bootstrapping (though interestingly I've seen such gradual initialization in both left-to-right and right-to-left directions, and I don't think a single watermark can handle both).
Rename `IndexVec::last` → `last_index`
As I've been trying to replace a `Vec` with an `IndexVec`, having `last` exist on both but returning very different types makes the transition a bit awkward -- the errors are later, where you get things like "there's no `ty` method on `mir::Field`" rather than a more localized error like "hey, there's no `last` on `IndexVec`".
So I propose renaming `last` to `last_index` to help distinguish `Vec::last`, which returns an element, and `IndexVec::last_index`, which returns an index.
(Similarly, `Iterator::last` also returns an element, not an index.)
Check for overflow in `assemble_candidates_after_normalizing_self_ty`
Prevents a stack overflow (⚠️❗) in the new solver when we have param-env candidates that look like: `T: Trait<Assoc = <T as Trait>::Assoc>`
The current error message looks bad, but that's because we don't distinguish overflow and other ambiguity errors. I'll break that out into a separate PR since the fix may be controversial.
r? `@lcnr`
Use span of placeholders in format_args!() expansion.
`format_args!("{}", x)` expands to something that contains `Argument::new_display(&x)`. That entire expression was generated with the span of `x`.
After this PR, `&x` uses the span of `x`, but the `new_display` call uses the span of the `{}` placeholder within the format string. If an implicitly captured argument was used like in `format_args!("{x}")`, both use the span of the `{x}` placeholder.
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109576, and also allows for more improvements to similar diagnostics in the future, since the usage of `x` can now be traced to the exact `{}` placeholder that required it to be `Display` (or `Debug` etc.)
rustdoc: Unsupport importing `doc(primitive)` and `doc(keyword)` modules
These are internal features used for a specific purpose, and modules without imports are enough for that purpose.
rustdoc + rustdoc-json support for `feature(non_lifetime_binders)`
Makes `for<T> T: Trait` and `for<const N: usize> ..` in where clause operate correctly.
Fixes#108158
As I've been trying to replace a `Vec` with an `IndexVec`, having `last` exist on both but returning very different types makes the transition a bit awkward -- the errors are later, where you get things like "there's no `ty` method on `mir::Field`" rather than a more localized error like "hey, there's no `last` on `IndexVec`".
So I propose renaming `last` to `last_index` to help distinguish `Vec::last`, which returns an element, and `IndexVec::last_index`, which returns an index.
(Similarly, `Iterator::last` also returns an element, not an index.)
The first PR for https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/606
This is just the move-and-rename, because it's plenty big-and-bitrotty already. Future PRs will start using `FieldIdx` more broadly, and concomitantly removing `FieldIdx::new`s.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #109149 (Improve error message when writer is forgotten in write and writeln macro)
- #109367 (Streamline fast rejection)
- #109548 (AnnotationColumn struct to fix hard tab column numbers in errors)
- #109694 (do not panic on failure to acquire jobserver token)
- #109705 (new solver: check for intercrate mode when accessing the cache)
- #109708 (Specialization involving RPITITs is broken so ignore the diagnostic differences)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Specialization involving RPITITs is broken so ignore the diagnostic differences
Just bless the corresponding test for `-Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty`
r? `@compiler-errors`
do not panic on failure to acquire jobserver token
Purpose: remove `panic`.
Rust fails to acquire token if an error in build system occurs - environment variable contains incorrect `jobserver-auth`. It isn't ice so compiler shouldn't panic on such error.
Related issue: #46981
Improve error message when writer is forgotten in write and writeln macro
Modified write! macro error message when writer is forgotten as in issue #108713Fixes#108713
r? ``@WaffleLapkin``
Simplify transmutes in MIR InstCombine
Thanks to the combination of #108246 and #108442 it could already remove identity transmutes.
With this PR, it can also simplify them to `IntToInt` casts, `Discriminant` reads, or `Field` projections.
Thanks to the combination of #108246 and #108442 it could already remove identity transmutes.
With this PR, it can also simplify them to `IntToInt` casts, `Discriminant` reads, or `Field` projections.
