Add `-Z time-passes-format` to allow specifying a JSON output for `-Z time-passes`
This adds back the `-Z time` option as that is useful for [my rustc benchmark tool](https://github.com/Zoxc/rcb), reverting https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102725. It now uses nanoseconds and bytes as the units so it is renamed to `time-precise`.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108541 (Suppress `opaque_hidden_inferred_bound` for nested RPITs)
- #109137 (resolve: Querify most cstore access methods (subset 2))
- #109380 (add `known-bug` test for unsoundness issue)
- #109462 (Make alias-eq have a relation direction (and rename it to alias-relate))
- #109475 (Simpler checked shifts in MIR building)
- #109504 (Stabilize `arc_into_inner` and `rc_into_inner`.)
- #109506 (make param bound vars visibly bound vars with -Zverbose)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make alias-eq have a relation direction (and rename it to alias-relate)
Emitting an "alias-eq" is too strict in some situations, since we don't always want strict equality between a projection and rigid ty. Adds a relation direction.
* I could probably just reuse this [`RelationDir`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_infer/infer/combine/enum.RelationDir.html) -- happy to uplift that struct into middle and use that instead, but I didn't feel compelled to... 🤷
* Some of the matching in `compute_alias_relate_goal` is a bit verbose -- I guess I could simplify it by using [`At::relate`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_infer/infer/at/struct.At.html#method.relate) and mapping the relation-dir to a variance.
* Alternatively, I coulld simplify things by making more helper functions on `EvalCtxt` (e.g. `EvalCtxt::relate_with_direction(T, T)` that also does the nested goal registration). No preference.
r? ```@lcnr``` cc ```@BoxyUwU``` though boxy can claim it if she wants
NOTE: first commit is all the changes, the second is just renaming stuff
Use region-erased self type during IAT selection
Split off from #109410 as discussed.
Fixes#109299.
Re UI test: I use a reproducer of #109299 that contains a name resolution error instead of reproducer [`regionck-2.rs`](fc7ed4af16/tests/ui/associated-inherent-types/regionck-2.rs) (as found in the `AliasKind::Inherent` PR) since it would (incorrectly) pass typeck in this PR due to the lack of regionck and I'd rather not make *that* a regression test (with or without `known-bug`).
``@rustbot`` label F-inherent_associated_types
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Do not consider synthesized RPITITs on missing items checks
Without this patch for `tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/dont-project-to-rpitit-with-no-value.rs` we get ...
```
warning: the feature `return_position_impl_trait_in_trait` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
--> tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/dont-project-to-rpitit-with-no-value.rs:4:12
|
4 | #![feature(return_position_impl_trait_in_trait)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #91611 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91611> for more information
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
error[E0046]: not all trait items implemented, missing: `foo`, ``
--> tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/dont-project-to-rpitit-with-no-value.rs:12:1
|
8 | fn foo(&self) -> impl Sized;
| ----------------------------
| | |
| | `` from trait
| `foo` from trait
...
12 | impl MyTrait for i32 {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `foo`, `` in implementation
error: aborting due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0046`.
```
instead of ...
```
warning: the feature `return_position_impl_trait_in_trait` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
--> $DIR/dont-project-to-rpitit-with-no-value.rs:4:12
|
LL | #![feature(return_position_impl_trait_in_trait)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #91611 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91611> for more information
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
error[E0046]: not all trait items implemented, missing: `foo`
--> $DIR/dont-project-to-rpitit-with-no-value.rs:12:1
|
LL | fn foo(&self) -> impl Sized;
| ---------------------------- `foo` from trait
...
LL | impl MyTrait for i32 {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `foo` in implementation
error: aborting due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0046`.
```
r? `@compiler-errors`
move Option::as_slice to intrinsic
````@scottmcm```` suggested on #109095 I use a direct approach of unpacking the operation in MIR lowering, so here's the implementation.
cc ````@nikic```` as this should hopefully unblock #107224 (though perhaps other changes to the prior implementation, which I left for bootstrapping, are needed).
a general type system cleanup
removes the helper functions `traits::fully_solve_X` as they add more complexity then they are worth. It's confusing which of these helpers should be used in which context.
changes the way we deal with overflow to always add depth in `evaluate_predicates_recursively`. It may make sense to actually fully transition to not have `recursion_depth` on obligations but that's probably a bit too much for this PR.
also removes some other small - and imo unnecessary - helpers.
r? types
Only expect a GAT const param for `type_of` of GAT const arg
IDK why we were account for both `is_ty_or_const` instead of just for a const param, since we're computing the `type_of` a const param specifically.
Fixes#109300
Fix generics_of for impl's RPITIT synthesized associated type
The only useful commit is the last one.
This makes `generics_of` for the impl side RPITIT copy from the trait's associated type and avoid the fn on the impl side which was previously wrongly used.
This solution is better but we still need to fix resolution of the generated generics.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Fix generics mismatch errors for RPITITs on -Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty
This PR stops reporting errors due to different count of generics on the new synthesized associated types for RPITITs. Those were already reported when we compare the function on the triat with the function on the impl.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Install projection from RPITIT to default trait method opaque correctly
1. For new lowering strategy `-Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty`, install the correct default trait method projection predicates (RPITIT -> opaque). This makes default trait body tests pass!
2. Fix two WF-checking bugs -- first, we want to make sure that we're always looking for an opaque type in `check_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_bounds`. That's because the RPITIT projections are normalized to opaques during wfcheck. Second, fix RPITIT's param-envs by not adding the projection predicates that we install on trait methods to make default RPITITs work -- I left a comment why.
3. Also, just a small drive-by for `rustc_on_unimplemented`. Not sure if it affects any tests, but can't hurt.
r? ````@spastorino,```` based off of #109140
make `define_opaque_types` fully explicit
based on the idea of #108389. Moved `define_opaque_types` into the actual operations, e.g. `eq`, instead of `infcx.at` because normalization doesn't use `define_opaque_types` and even creates it's own `At` with a different `define_opaque_types` internally.
Somewhat surprisingly, coherence actually relies on `DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes` for soundness which was revealed because I've incorrectly used `DefineOpaqueTypes::No` in `equate_impl_headers`. It feels concerning that even though this is the case, we still sometimes use `DefineOpaqueTypes::No` in coherence. I did not look into this as part of this PR as it is purely changing the structure of the code without changing behavior in any way.
r? ```@oli-obk```
Revert #107376 to fix potential `bincode` breakage and `rustc-perf` benchmark.
#107376 caused `rustc-perf`'s `webrender` benchmark to break, by regressing on the `bincode-1.3.3` crate.
~~This PR is a draft revert in case we can't land a fix soon enough, and we'd like to land the revert instead~~
(Though I myself think it'd be safer to do the revert, and run crater when relanding #107376.)
cc `@aliemjay`
