in most cases, just the error message changed, but in some cases we
are reporting new errors that OUGHT to have been reported before but
we're overlooked (mostly involving the `'static` bound on `Send`).
This pull request tries to fix#19340, which states two ICE cases related to enum struct variants.
It is my first attempt to fix the compiler. I found this solution by trial and error, so the method used to fix the issue looks very hacky. Please review it, and direct me to find a better solution.
I'm also to add test cases. Where should I put them? Maybe `src/test/run-pass/issue-19340.rs`?
The current behavior leads to adjustments like `&&*` being applied
instead of just `&` (when the unmodified receiver is a `&T` or an `&mut
T`). This causes both safety errors and unexpected behavior. The safety
errors result from regionck not being prepared for auto-ref-ref-like
adjustments; this is worth fixing on its own, but I think the best way
to do it is to modify regionck to use expr-use-visitor (and fix
expr-use-visitor as well, which I don't think properly invokes `borrow`
for each level of auto-ref), and for now it's simpler to just not
produce the adjustment in question. (I have a separate patch porting
regionck to use exprusevisitor for a different bug, so that is coming.)
Previously, the DeBruijn index for the self type was not being
adjusted to account for the fn binder. This mean that when late-bound
regions were instantiated, you sometimes wind up with two distinct
lifetimes.
Fixes#19537.
When a type error occurs, check_method_argument_types() tries to provide
arguments filled with ty::mk_err(). However, if a function takes the
parameters as a tuple, the arguments should be converted to a tuple
before being passed to check_argument_types().
Fixes#19521.
One of the causes of #19501 was that the metadata on OSX was getting corrupted.
For any one particular invocation of the compiler the metadata file inside of an
rlib archive would have extra bytes appended to the end of it. These extra bytes
end up confusing rbml and have it run off the end of the array (resulting in the
out of bounds detected).
This commit prepends the length of metadata to the start of the metadata to
ensure that we always slice the precise amount that we want, and it also
un-ignores the test from #19502.
Closes#19501
This means that `Fn(&A) -> (&B, &C)` is equivalent to `for<'a> Fn(&'a A)
-> (&'a B, &'a C)` similar to the lifetime elision of lower-case `fn` in
types and declarations.
Closes#18992.
Reported as a part of rust-lang/rust#19120
The logic of rust-lang/rust@74fb798a20 was
flawed because when a CI tool run the test parallely with other tasks,
they all belong to a single session family and the test may pick up
irrelevant zombie processes before they are reaped by the CI tool
depending on timing.
detect UFCS drop and allow UFCS methods to have explicit type parameters.
Work towards #18875.
Since code could previously call the methods & implement the traits
manually, this is a
[breaking-change]
Closes#19586. Closes#19375.
This is particularly important for deeply nested types, which generate deeply nested impls. This is a fix for #19318. It's possible we could also improve this particular case not to increment the recursion count, but it's worth being able to adjust the recursion limit anyhow.
cc @jdm
r? @pcwalton
One of the causes of #19501 was that the metadata on OSX was getting corrupted.
For any one particular invocation of the compiler the metadata file inside of an
rlib archive would have extra bytes appended to the end of it. These extra bytes
end up confusing rbml and have it run off the end of the array (resulting in the
out of bounds detected).
This commit prepends the length of metadata to the start of the metadata to
ensure that we always slice the precise amount that we want, and it also
un-ignores the test from #19502.
Closes#19501
This change makes the compiler no longer infer whether types (structures
and enumerations) implement the `Copy` trait (and thus are implicitly
copyable). Rather, you must implement `Copy` yourself via `impl Copy for
MyType {}`.
A new warning has been added, `missing_copy_implementations`, to warn
you if a non-generic public type has been added that could have
implemented `Copy` but didn't.
For convenience, you may *temporarily* opt out of this behavior by using
`#![feature(opt_out_copy)]`. Note though that this feature gate will never be
accepted and will be removed by the time that 1.0 is released, so you should
transition your code away from using it.
This breaks code like:
#[deriving(Show)]
struct Point2D {
x: int,
y: int,
}
fn main() {
let mypoint = Point2D {
x: 1,
y: 1,
};
let otherpoint = mypoint;
println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint);
}
Change this code to:
#[deriving(Show)]
struct Point2D {
x: int,
y: int,
}
impl Copy for Point2D {}
fn main() {
let mypoint = Point2D {
x: 1,
y: 1,
};
let otherpoint = mypoint;
println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint);
}
This is the backwards-incompatible part of #13231.
Part of RFC #3.
[breaking-change]
The test harness will make sure that the panic message contains the
specified string. This is useful to help make `#[should_fail]` tests a
bit less brittle by decreasing the chance that the test isn't
"accidentally" passing due to a panic occurring earlier than expected.
The behavior is in some ways similar to JUnit's `expected` feature:
`@Test(expected=NullPointerException.class)`.
Without the message assertion, this test would pass even though it's not
actually reaching the intended part of the code:
```rust
#[test]
#[should_fail(message = "out of bounds")]
fn test_oob_array_access() {
let idx: uint = from_str("13o").unwrap(); // oops, this will panic
[1i32, 2, 3][idx];
}
```
Closes#18959
Technically, this causes code that once compiled to no longer compile, but
that code probably never ran.
[breaking-change]
------------
Not quite sure the error message is good enough, I feel like it ought to tell you "because it inherits from non-object-safe trait Foo", so I've opened up a follow-up issue #19538
In regards to:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/19253#issuecomment-64836729
This commit:
* Changes the #deriving code so that it generates code that utilizes fewer
reexports (in particur Option::\*, Result::\*, and Ordering::\*), which is necessary to
remove those reexports in the future
* Changes other areas of the codebase so that fewer reexports are utilized
The test harness will make sure that the panic message contains the
specified string. This is useful to help make `#[should_fail]` tests a
bit less brittle by decreasing the chance that the test isn't
"accidentally" passing due to a panic occurring earlier than expected.
The behavior is in some ways similar to JUnit's `expected` feature:
`@Test(expected=NullPointerException.class)`.
Without the message assertion, this test would pass even though it's not
actually reaching the intended part of the code:
```rust
#[test]
#[should_fail(message = "out of bounds")]
fn test_oob_array_access() {
let idx: uint = from_str("13o").unwrap(); // oops, this will panic
[1i32, 2, 3][idx];
}
```
Reported as a part of rust-lang/rust#19120
The logic of rust-lang/rust@74fb798a20 was
flawed because when a CI tool run the test parallely with other tasks,
they all belong to a single session family and the test may pick up
irrelevant zombie processes before they are reaped by the CI tool
depending on timing.
Also, panic! inside a loop over all children makes the logic simpler.
By not destructing the return values of Command::spawn() until
find_zombies() finishes, I believe we can conduct a slightly stricter
test.
Signed-off-by: NODA, Kai <nodakai@gmail.com>
