Add Iterator::try_find
I found a need for this fn, and created this PR.
Tracking issue: #63178
I did a fair amount of thinking about the function name, and settled on the current one.
I don't see other anything else that's non-trivial here, but I'm open for debate. I just want this functionality to be there.
It couples with the `collect` trick for collecting `Result<Vec<T>, E>` from `Iterator<Item = Result<T, E>>`.
UPD:
I've already looked at `fallible_iterator` crate, but I don't think it supports my use case.
The main problem is that I can't construct a failable iterator. I have a regular iterator, and I just need to apply a predicate that can fail via `find` method.
UPD: `fallible_iterator` would work, but it's not elegant cause I'd have to make a failable iterator by mapping iterator with `Result::Ok` first.
Lint overflowing integer casts in const prop
This extends the invalid cases we catch in const prop to include
overflowing integer casts using the same machinery as the overflowing
binary and unary operation logic.
r? @oli-obk
Revert parts of #66405.
Because PR #66405 caused major performance regressions in some cases.
That PR had five commits, two of which affected performance, and three
of which were refactorings. This change undoes the performance-affecting
changes, while keeping the refactorings in place.
Fixes#67454.
r? @nikomatsakis
Because it caused major performance regressions in some cases.
That PR had five commits, two of which affected performance, and three
of which were refactorings. This change undoes the performance-affecting
changes, while keeping the refactorings in place.
Fixes#67454.
Use function attribute "frame-pointer" instead of "no-frame-pointer-elim"
LLVM 8 ([D56351](http://reviews.llvm.org/D56351)) introduced "frame-pointer". In LLVM 10 (D71863),
"no-frame-pointer-elim"/"no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf" will be
ignored.
-----
In the LLVM monorepo, run `git show origin/release/8.x:llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetOptionsImpl.cpp` to see that `"frame-pointer"` is available since LLVM 8.
parser: reduce diversity in error handling mechanisms
Instead of having e.g. `span_err`, `fatal`, etc., we prefer to move towards uniformly using `struct_span_err` thus making it harder to emit fatal and/or unstructured diagnostics.
This PR also de-fatalizes some diagnostics.
r? @estebank
Extract `rustc_ast_lowering` crate from `rustc`
Working towards https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65031.
This PR moves `src/librustc/hir/lowering{/, .rs}` to its own crate (`librustc_ast_lowering`) which is very self-contained (only `fn lower_crate` and `trait Resolver` are exposed).
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Support `-Z ui-testing=yes/no`
`ui-testing` is now a boolean option (`-Z ui-testing=yes/no`) and can be specified multiple times with later values overriding earlier values (`-Z ui-testing=yes -Z ui-testing=no` == `-Z ui-testing=no`), so it can be set in a hierarchical way, e.g. UI testing infra may enable it by default with specific tests being able to opt-out.
This way we can remove the special opt-out support from `compiletest`.
Inspired by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67709.
