Commit Graph

567 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Aleksey Kladov
970dbf8717 Rename StructField -> Field 2020-04-25 14:23:34 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
e873469500 text-size 1.0.0 2020-04-25 12:15:32 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
dc2151085e Cleanups 2020-04-25 11:59:18 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
8843588fca Convert tests to text-size 2020-04-25 11:59:18 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
b1d5817dd1 Convert code to text-size 2020-04-25 11:59:18 +02:00
bors[bot]
27a7718880
Merge #4128
4128: Include correct item path for variant completions r=matklad a=jonas-schievink

The test would previously suggest `E::V`, which is not enough to name the variant as the enum is in a module. Now it correctly suggests the full path `m::E::V`.

Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
2020-04-24 21:11:19 +00:00
Jonas Schievink
e131763fb8 Include correct item path for variant completions 2020-04-24 22:18:59 +02:00
bors[bot]
51a0058d4c
Merge #3998 #4006
3998: Make add_function generate functions in other modules via qualified path r=matklad a=TimoFreiberg

Additional feature for #3639 

- [x] Add tests for paths with more segments
- [x] Make generating the function in another file work
- [x] Add `pub` or `pub(crate)` to the generated function if it's generated in a different module
- [x] Make the assist jump to the edited file
- [x] Enable file support in the `check_assist` helper

4006: Syntax highlighting for format strings r=matklad a=ltentrup

I have an implementation for syntax highlighting for format string modifiers `{}`.
The first commit refactors the changes in #3826 into a separate struct.
The second commit implements the highlighting: first we check in a macro call whether the macro is a format macro from `std`. In this case, we remember the format string node. If we encounter this node during syntax highlighting, we check for the format modifiers `{}` using regular expressions.

There are a few places which I am not quite sure:
- Is the way I extract the macro names correct?
- Is the `HighlightTag::Attribute` suitable for highlighting the `{}`?

Let me know what you think, any feedback is welcome!

Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <timo.freiberg@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <leander.tentrup@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <ltentrup@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-04-24 20:10:54 +00:00
Jonas Schievink
7b9553a703 Don't omit methods with self from path completion 2020-04-24 21:46:18 +02:00
Roberto Vidal
0dab5d5879 Adds attribute completions (#3941) 2020-04-24 17:54:52 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
62e08fa53d Better label for macros completion 2020-04-24 13:25:37 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
440cd05edb Honor snippet capability
closes #2518
2020-04-24 02:41:07 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
5fd5de4061 Make sure that adding a snippet requires corresponding capability 2020-04-24 02:26:38 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
b3050bded1 Introduce internal snippet cap 2020-04-24 02:06:12 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
bd3b239390 Move CompletionConfig to a separate module 2020-04-24 02:01:23 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
647683b9bb Add test marks 2020-04-24 01:48:32 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
09a4b78775 Introduce ActiveParameter 2020-04-24 01:46:00 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
4b8e9d5483 Move tests to where they belong 2020-04-24 01:26:27 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
174952e89b Refactor 2020-04-24 01:24:08 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
953b5f23cc Restore CompletionItem immutability 2020-04-24 01:17:33 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
6654b9aff3 More functional 2020-04-24 01:08:27 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
75cb1c1806 Move 2020-04-24 00:11:33 +02:00
bors[bot]
e833e03783
Merge #3954
3954: Improve autocompletion by looking on the type and name r=matklad a=bnjjj

This tweet (https://twitter.com/tjholowaychuk/status/1248918374731714560) gaves me the idea to implement that in rust-analyzer.

Basically for this first example I made some examples when we are in a function call definition. I look on the parameter list to prioritize autocompletions for the same types and if it's the same type + the same name then it's displayed first in the completion list.

So here is a draft, first step to open a discussion and know what you think about the implementation. It works (cf tests) but maybe I can make a better implementation at some places. Be careful the code needs some refactoring to be better and concise.

PS: It was lot of fun writing this haha

Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-04-23 21:48:45 +00:00
bors[bot]
278bf351e3
Merge #4065
4065: Complete unqualified enum names in patterns and expressions r=matklad a=nathanwhit

This PR implements the completion described in #4014.
The result looks like so for patterns:
<img width="542" alt="Screen Shot 2020-04-20 at 3 53 55 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17734409/79794010-8f529400-831f-11ea-9673-f838aa9bc962.png">

and for `expr`s:
<img width="620" alt="Screen Shot 2020-04-21 at 3 51 24 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17734409/79908784-d73ded80-83e9-11ea-991d-921f0cb27e6f.png">


I'm not confident that the completion text itself is very robust, as it will unconditionally add completions for enum variants with the form `Enum::Variant`. This means (I believe) it would still suggest `Enum::Variant` even if the local name is changed i.e. `use Enum as Foo` or the variants are brought into scope such as through `use Enum::*`.

Co-authored-by: nathanwhit <nathan.whitaker01@gmail.com>
2020-04-23 15:35:31 +00:00
Aleksey Kladov
4176c03d12 Remove SyntaxPtr::range from more places 2020-04-23 16:33:01 +02:00
Hannes De Valkeneer
380a2870c7 feat: run ignored tests 2020-04-22 23:54:09 +02:00
nathanwhit
dfde73ef90 Update tests to reflect new completions 2020-04-22 12:21:22 -04:00
nathanwhit
18ad86fdda Add tests for enum completion
Adds tests for completion of enum variants in match arms, if-let statements, and basic expressions.
2020-04-22 12:21:22 -04:00
nathanwhit
8664509745 Complete unqualified enum variants when possible 2020-04-22 12:21:14 -04:00
nathanwhit
6c61a7b22f Add utility fn for expected type of a node
Adds `expected_type_of` to `CompletionContext` to return the expected type of a
node, if it is known.
2020-04-22 12:20:18 -04:00
Leander Tentrup
445052f6d4 Adapt format specifier highlighting to support escaped squences and unicode identifiers 2020-04-22 15:28:35 +02:00
Leander Tentrup
b2829a5216 Apply suggestions from code review
Co-Authored-By: bjorn3 <bjorn3@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-04-22 10:18:46 +02:00
Timo Freiberg
ba8faf3efc Add target file information to AssistAction 2020-04-21 23:04:44 +02:00
Benjamin Coenen
b6a7be19d9 Improve autocompletion by looking on the type and name
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-04-21 14:36:56 +02:00
Benjamin Coenen
7f143b154e Merge branch 'master' of github.com:rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer 2020-04-21 14:32:02 +02:00
Benjamin Coenen
1c3a1385a5 Improve autocompletion by looking on the type and name
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-04-21 14:31:57 +02:00
Leander Tentrup
ac798e1f7c Implement syntax highlighting for format strings
Detailed changes:
1) Implement a lexer for string literals that divides the string in format specifier `{}` including the format specifier modifier.
2) Adapt syntax highlighting to add ranges for the detected sequences.
3) Add a test case for the format string syntax highlighting.
2020-04-20 11:19:15 +02:00
Jeremy Kolb
d7f3d858ad Some clippy fixes 2020-04-19 15:15:49 -04:00
Aleksey Kladov
fa2ea8f494 Fix goto definition for record patterns 2020-04-18 22:11:49 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
ca61356b01 Add semantic tag for unresolved references
This is a quick way to implement unresolved reference diagnostics.
For example, adding to VS Code config

    "editor.tokenColorCustomizationsExperimental": {
        "unresolvedReference": "#FF0000"
    },

will highlight all unresolved refs in red.
2020-04-18 21:28:51 +02:00
bors[bot]
98819d8919
Merge #4029
4029: Fix various proc-macro bugs r=matklad a=edwin0cheng

This PRs does the following things:

1. Fixed #4001 by splitting `LIFETIME` lexer token to two mbe tokens. It is because rustc token stream expects `LIFETIME` as a combination of punct and ident, but RA `tt:TokenTree` treats it as a single `Ident` previously.
2. Fixed #4003, by skipping `proc-macro` for completion. It is because currently we don't have `AstNode` for `proc-macro`. We would need to redesign how to implement `HasSource` for `proc-macro`.
3.  Fixed a bug how empty `TokenStream` merging in `proc-macro-srv` such that no L_DOLLAR and R_DOLLAR will be emitted accidentally. 


Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
2020-04-18 17:56:54 +00:00
Benjamin Coenen
af3c19e85f Merge branch 'master' of github.com:rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer 2020-04-18 17:14:24 +02:00
Leander Tentrup
29a846464b Refactor flattening logic for highlighted syntax ranges 2020-04-18 15:02:51 +02:00
Edwin Cheng
f78de3bb95 Ignore proc-macro in completion 2020-04-18 19:26:54 +08:00
bors[bot]
0948932145
Merge #4026
4026: Omit more parameter hints in the presence of underscores r=matklad a=lnicola

Fixes #4017.

Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
2020-04-18 09:01:41 +00:00
Laurențiu Nicola
8a51a74556 Omit more parameter hints in the presence of underscores 2020-04-18 10:53:48 +03:00
Leander Tentrup
2e2c03ee2d Fix incorrect order of syntax highlight ranges 2020-04-17 22:50:30 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov
028f1e2e3a Don\t suggest import itself as a completion for import 2020-04-17 14:28:20 +02:00
bors[bot]
0262c9b9c0
Merge #4010
4010: Fix handling of ranges in diagnostics r=matklad a=matklad

bors r+
🤖

Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
2020-04-17 11:57:29 +00:00
Aleksey Kladov
a8196ffe84 Correctly highlight ranges of diagnostics from macros
closes #2799
2020-04-17 13:56:38 +02:00