unnecessary sort by: avoid dereferencing the suggested closure parameter
This change tries to simplify the solution for problematic cases but is less restrictive than #6006.
* We can't dereference shared references to non-Copy types, so the new suggestion does not do that. Note that this implies that the suggested closure parameter will be a reference.
* We can't take a reference to the closure parameter in the returned key, so we don't lint in those cases. This can happen either because the key borrows from the parameter (e.g. `|a| a.borrows()`), or because we suggest `|a| Reverse(a)`. If we did we would hit this error:
```
error: lifetime may not live long enough
--> /home/ebroto/src/ebroto-clippy/tests/ui/unnecessary_sort_by.fixed:19:25
|
19 | vec.sort_by_key(|b| Reverse(b));
| -- ^^^^^^^^^^ returning this value requires that `'1` must outlive `'2`
| ||
| |return type of closure is Reverse<&'2 isize>
| has type `&'1 isize`
error: aborting due to previous error
```
Note that Clippy does not currently have the (MIR-based) machinery necessary to check that what is borrowed is actually the closure parameter.
changelog: [`unnecessary_sort_by`]: avoid dereferencing the suggested closure parameter
Fixes#6001
fix a false positive in two `interior_mutable_const` lints where a constant with enums gets linted
even if it uses a clearly unfrozen variant. Note that the code uses the MIR interpreter, which
the author of #3962 thought unlikely to be a solution. This might be over-engineering;
but, I think it's important to be able to work with the 'http' crate (#3825).
* remove a 'ERROR' comment from `borrow`
`Vec<AtomicUsize>` itself is `Freeze` as it holds the atomic in heap
* remove `ONCE_INIT` from `declare`
it seems like an artifact from previous spliting
Don't emit a lint for the suggestion leading to errors in `needless_range_loop`
Fix#5945
changelog: Don't emit a lint for the suggestion leading to errors in `needless_range_loop`
Fix FP in `print_stdout`
Fix#6041
This lint shouldn't be emitted in `build.rs` as `println!` and `print!` are used for the build script.
changelog: none
UI tests cleanup
`@matthiaskrgr` noticed some `run-pass` annotations in some crash tests that were added in #3922. At that moment they seemed to be necessary to make the tests fail in case of an ICE, but they do not seem to be needed anymore. To test this I forced an ICE in a file with and without annotations, with and without stderr files, and the ICE makes the test fail every time.
In addition, I've applied a suggestion from `@ehuss` and `@jyn514` to add `emit=metadata` to the rustc flags for the UI tests. In my machine this improved the run time from ~17 to ~12 seconds.
changelog: none
Revert: or_fun_call should lint calls to `const fn`s with no args
The changes in #5889 and #5984 were done under the incorrect assumption that a `const fn` with no args was guaranteed to be evaluated at compile time. A `const fn` is only guaranteed to be evaluated at compile time if it's inside a const context (the initializer of a `const` or a `static`).
See this [zulip conversation](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/122651-general/topic/Common.20misconception.3A.20.60const.20fn.60.20and.20its.20effect.20on.20codegen/near/208059113) for more details on this common misconception.
Given that none of the linted methods by `or_fun_call` can be called in const contexts, the lint should make no exceptions.
changelog: [`or_fun_call`] lints again calls to `const fn` with no args
Fix a FP in `explicit_counter_loop`
Fixes#4677 and #6074
Fix a false positive in `explicit_counter_loop` where the loop counter is used after incremented, adjust the test so that counters are incremented at the end of the loop and add the test for this false positive.
---
changelog: Fix a false positive in `explicit_counter_loop` where the loop counter is used after incremented
Add `rc_buffer` lint for checking Rc<String> and friends
Fixes#2623
This is a bit different from the original PR attempting to implement this type of lint. Rather than linting against converting into the unwanted types, this PR lints against declaring the unwanted type in a struct or function definition.
I'm reasonably happy with what I have here, although I used the fully qualified type names for the Path and OsString suggestions, and I'm not sure if I should have just used the short versions instead, even if they might not have been declared via use.
Also, I don't know if "buffer type" is the best way to put it or not. Alternatively I could call it a "growable type" or "growable buffer type", but I was thinking of PathBuf when I started making the lint.
changelog: Add `rc_buffer` lint
Fix a false positive in `explicit_counter_loop` where the loop counter is used after incremented,
adjust the test so that counters are incremented at the end of the loop
and add the test for this false positive.
