[`redundant_closure`]: special case inclusive ranges
Fixes#10684.
`x..=y` ranges need a bit of special handling in this lint because it desugars to a call to the lang item `RangeInclusiveNew`, where the callee span would be the same as the range expression itself, so the suggestion looked a bit weird. It now correctly suggests `RangeInclusive::new`.
changelog: [`redundant_closure`]: special case `RangeInclusive`
Adds new lint `arc_with_non_send_or_sync`
Fixes#653
Adds a new lint to check for uses of non-Send/Sync types within Arc.
```
changelog: [`arc_with_non_send_sync`]: Added a lint to detect uses of non-Send/Sync types within Arc.
```
[`useless_vec`]: lint `vec!` invocations when a slice or an array would do
First off, sorry for that large diff in tests. *A lot* of tests seem to trigger the lint with this new change, so I decided to `#![allow()]` the lint in the affected tests to make reviewing this easier, and also split the commits up so that the first commit is the actual logic of the lint and the second commit contains all the test changes. The stuff that changed in the tests is mostly just line numbers now. So, as large as the diff looks, it's not actually that bad. 😅
I manually went through all of these to find out about edge cases and decided to put them in `tests/ui/vec.rs`.
For more context, I wrote about the idea of this PR here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/2262#issuecomment-1579155257 (that explains the logic)
Basically, it now also considers the case where a `Vec` is put in a local variable and the user only ever does things with it that one could also do with a slice or an array. This should catch a lot more cases, and (at least from looking at the tests) it does.
changelog: [`useless_vec`]: lint `vec!` invocations when a slice or an array would do (also considering local variables now)
`suspicious_else_formatting`: Don't warn if there is a comment between else and curly bracket
This PR fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/10273
The idea is that if the only thing after `else` and before `{` is a comment, we will not warn because, probably, the line break was "made" by rustfmt.
changelog: [`suspicious_else_formatting`]: Don't warn if the only thing between `else` and curly bracket is a comment
[`missing_fields_in_debug`]: don't ICE when self type is a generic param
Fixes#10887
This PR fixes an ICE that happens when the implementor (self type) of a `Debug` impl is a generic parameter.
The lint calls `TyCtxt::type_of` with that self type, which ICEs when called with generic parameters, so this just adds a quick check before getting there to ignore them.
That can only happen inside of core itself (afaik) because the orphan rules forbid defining an impl such as `impl<T> Debug for T` outside of core, so I'm not sure how to add a test for this.
It seems like this impl in particular caused this: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/fmt/trait.Debug.html#impl-Debug-for-F
changelog: [`missing_fields_in_debug`]: don't ICE on blanket `Debug` impl in core
[`let_with_type_underscore`]: Don't emit on locals from procedural macros
closes#10498
changelog: [`let_with_type_underscore`]: Don't emit on locals from procedural macros
make cast_possible_wrap work correctly for 16 bit {u,i}size
These changes make `cast_possible_wrap` aware of the different pointer widths and fixes the implementation to print the correct pointer widths.
Fixes#9337
changelog: `cast_possible_wrap` does not lint on `u8 as isize` or `usize as i8`, since these can never wrap.
`cast_possible_wrap` now properly considers 16 bit pointer size and prints the correct bit widths.
Add redundant type annotations lint
Hello, I'm trying to add the `redundat_type_annotations` lint.
It's still WIP but I'd like to start gathering some feedbacks to be sure that I'm not doing things 100% wrong :)
Right now it still misses lints like:
- [x] `let foo: u32 = 5_u32`,
- [x] `let foo: String = STest2::func()`
- [x] `let foo: String = self.func()` (`MethodCall`)
- [x] refs
- [ ] Generics
I've some problems regarding the second example above, in the `init` part of the `Local` I have:
```rust
init: Some(
Expr {
hir_id: HirId(DefId(0:24 ~ playground[e1bd]::main).58),
kind: Call(
Expr {
hir_id: HirId(DefId(0:24 ~ playground[e1bd]::main).59),
kind: Path(
TypeRelative(
Ty {
hir_id: HirId(DefId(0:24 ~ playground[e1bd]::main).61),
kind: Path(
Resolved(
None,
Path {
span: src/main.rs:77:21: 77:27 (#0),
res: Def(
Struct,
DefId(0:17 ~ playground[e1bd]::STest2),
),
segments: [
PathSegment {
ident: STest2#0,
hir_id: HirId(DefId(0:24 ~ playground[e1bd]::main).60),
res: Def(
Struct,
DefId(0:17 ~ playground[e1bd]::STest2),
),
args: None,
infer_args: true,
},
],
},
),
),
span: src/main.rs:77:21: 77:27 (#0),
},
PathSegment {
ident: get_numb#0,
hir_id: HirId(DefId(0:24 ~ playground[e1bd]::main).62),
res: Err,
args: None,
infer_args: true,
},
),
),
span: src/main.rs:77:21: 77:37 (#0),
},
[],
),
span: src/main.rs:77:21: 77:39 (#0),
},
),
```
And I'm not sure how to get the return type of the function `STest2::func()` since the resolved path `DefId` points to the struct itself and not the function. Do you have any idea on how I could get this information in this case?
Thanks!
changelog: changelog: [`redundant_type_annotations`]: New lint to warn on redundant type annotations
fixes#9155
Bring up Rust lang #37612 as a known problem for let_and_return
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/4182.
I don't think conforming to this lint could trigger the issue immediately, only if subsequent code-changes go wrong, but I may be mistaken.
Since the lint can't trigger it by itself, just closing this issue might be reasonable, if not maybe this PR fixes it.
changelog: Update docs for `let_and_return`, mention rust-lang #37612
Add lints for disallowing usage of `to_xx_bytes` and `from_xx_bytes`
Adds `host_endian_bytes`, `little_endian_bytes` and `big_endian_bytes`
Closes#10765
v - not sure what to put here since this adds 3 lints
changelog: Add `host_endian_bytes`, `little_endian_bytes` and `big_endian_bytes` lints
[`allow_attributes`, `allow_attributes_without_reason`]: Ignore attributes from procedural macros
I use `lint_reasons` and `clap`, which is a bit overzealous when it comes to preventing warnings in its macros; it uses a ton of allow attributes on everything to, as ironic as it is, silence warnings. These two now ignore anything from procedural macros.
PS, I think `allow_attributes.rs` should be merged with `attrs.rs` in the future.
fixes#10377
changelog: [`allow_attributes`, `allow_attributes_without_reason`]: Ignore attributes from procedural macros
Ignore fix for `from_over_into` if the target type contains a `Self` reference
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/10838.
This is my first time contributing here, and the fix is kind of ugly.
I've worked a bit with `quote` and was trying to figure out a way to replace the type in a better way than just a raw string-replace but couldn't quite figure out how to.
The only thing really required to fix this, is to replace all `Self` references with the type stated in the `from` variable, this isn't entirely simple to do with raw strings without creating a mess though.
We need to find and replace all `Self`'s in a variable with `from` but there could be an arbitrary amount, in a lot of different positions. As well as some type that contains the name self, like `SelfVarSelf` which shouldn't be replaced.
The strategy is essentially, if `"Self"` is surrounded on both sides by something that isn't alphanumeric, then we're golden, then trying to make that reasonably efficient.
I would not be offended if the solution is too messy to accept!
changelog: [from_over_into]: Replace Self with the indicated variable in suggestion and fix.
new lint: `explicit_into_iter_fn_arg`
Closes#10743.
This adds a lint that looks for `.into_iter()` calls in a call expression to a function that already expects an `IntoIterator`. In those cases, explicitly calling `.into_iter()` is unnecessary.
There were a few instances of this in clippy itself so I fixed those as well in this PR.
changelog: new lint [`explicit_into_iter_fn_arg`]
manual_let_else: support struct patterns
This adds upon the improvements of #10797 and:
* Only prints `()` around `Or` patterns at the top level (fixing a regression of #10797)
* Supports multi-binding patterns: `let (u, v) = if let (Some(u_i), Ok(v_i)) = ex { (u_i, v_i) } else ...`
* Traverses through tuple patterns: `let v = if let (Some(v), None) = ex { v } else ...`
* Supports struct patterns: `let v = if let S { v, w, } = ex { (v, w) } else ...`
```
changelog: [`manual_let_else`]: improve pattern printing to support struct patterns
```
fixes#10708fixes#10424
[`ptr_cast_constness`]: Only lint on casts which don't change type
fixes#10874
changelog: [`ptr_cast_constness`]: Only lint on casts which don't change type
Emit `unnecessary_cast` on raw pointers as well
Supersedes(?) #10782, since this and #10567 will cover the original issue.
Does not lint on type aliases or inferred types.
changelog: [`unnecessary_cast`]: Also emit on casts between raw pointers with the same type and constness
Clippy Book Chapter Updates Reborn: Refresh Lint Configuration's looks
This PR modernizes and clears up some confusion with the "Lint Configuration Options" chapter from the book.
### Changes
- **Remove 'Option - Default Value" table**
- Why was it even there?
- It shouldn't be the first thing an user sees when they enter the chapter. It's clunky, ugly and not useful. The default values for configs are stated in a per-config basis if needed.
- **Add a simple description of what the chapter contains, and the scheme of each configuration option**
- **Minor formatting, mainly adding code fragments to code text**
- It seemed weird and jarring not having back-ticks on text like "arithmetic_side_effects".
- Improves readability and separation between configs.
- **Separate a little bit the Affected Lints list + "Affected lists" message**
- Not having something indicating that the list is about the lints that use the configuration option is confusing.
- It isn't as important as the description and example. Therefore should be separated a little bit imo
---
This is an independent effort from #10597, but as it's still a Book Chapter Update, I thought it would be cool to include it here. I'm going to keep the reviewing process for this PR to rustbot's desires.
[Rendered](https://github.com/blyxyas/rust-clippy/blob/book-lint_config/book/src/lint_configuration.md)
[Current](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/blob/master/book/src/lint_configuration.md)
changelog: Refresh styling from the "Lint Configuration Options" book chapter.
add checking for cfg(features = ...)
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: [`maybe_misused_cfg`]: check if `#[cfg(feature = "...")]` misused as `#[cfg(features = "...")]`
I've found that there is no indication when `#[cfg(features = "...")]` is used incorrectly, which can easily make mistakes hard to spot. When I searched for this code on github, I also found many misuse cases([link](https://github.com/search?q=%23%5Bcfg%28features+language%3ARust&type=code)).
PS: This clippy name is just a temporary name, it can be replaced with a better name.
