[significant_drop_tightening] Ignore inexpensive statements
Not all statements that follow the last use of a lock guard are expensive and can therefore be ignored by the lint.
```rust
pub fn foo() -> i32 {
let mutex = Mutex::new(1);
let lock = mutex.lock().unwrap();
let rslt = *lock;
let another = rslt;
another
}
```
---
changelog: [`significant_drop_tightening`]: No longer lints for inexpensive statements after the lock guard
[#10363](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10363)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
There are several `mk_foo`/`intern_foo` pairs, where the former takes an
iterator and the latter takes a slice. (This naming convention is bad,
but that's a fix for another PR.)
This commit changes several `mk_foo` occurrences into `intern_foo`,
avoiding the need for some `.iter()`/`.into_iter()` calls. Affected
cases:
- mk_type_list
- mk_tup
- mk_substs
- mk_const_list
Switch to `EarlyBinder` for `type_of` query
Part of the work to finish #105779 and implement https://github.com/rust-lang/types-team/issues/78.
Several queries `X` have a `bound_X` variant that wraps the output in `EarlyBinder`. This adds `EarlyBinder` to the return type of the `type_of` query and removes `bound_type_of`.
r? `@lcnr`
Implement partial support for non-lifetime binders
This implements support for non-lifetime binders. It's pretty useless currently, but I wanted to put this up so the implementation can be discussed.
Specifically, this piggybacks off of the late-bound lifetime collection code in `rustc_hir_typeck::collect::lifetimes`. This seems like a necessary step given the fact we don't resolve late-bound regions until this point, and binders are sometimes merged.
Q: I'm not sure if I should go along this route, or try to modify the earlier nameres code to compute the right bound var indices for type and const binders eagerly... If so, I'll need to rename all these queries to something more appropriate (I've done this for `resolve_lifetime::Region` -> `resolve_lifetime::ResolvedArg`)
cc rust-lang/types-team#81
r? `@ghost`
manual_let_else: do not suggest semantically different replacements
The problem is that this lint does not consider the possibility that the divergent branch can come first and that the patterns may overlap. This led to incorrect suggestions, previously registered as correct in the tests themselves:
```rust
let v = match build_enum() {
_ => continue,
Variant::Bar(v) | Variant::Baz(v) => v,
};
```
had a `let Variant::Bar(v) | Variant::Baz(v) = v else { continue; }` suggestion, which is obviously wrong as the original code `continue`s in any case. Issue #10241 gives another example.
The code now checks that the divergent branch comes second. It could be extended later (I've added a TODO) to check for non-overlapping patterns.
Fixes#10241.
changelog: [`manual_let_else`] do not suggest non equivalent replacements in `match`
Stop bytes_nth from suggesting code that does not compile
Fixes#10151
As discussed in the issue, this PR changes the lint in 2 ways
1. Replace `bytes().nth(n).unwrap()` with `as_bytes()[n]`
2. Replace other `bytes().nth(n)` with `as_bytes().get(n).copied()`
---
changelog: Stop bytes_nth from suggesting code that does not compile in some cases
Stop doc_markdown requiring backticks on links to external websites
Fixes#10302
This lint currently checks that any link should be enclosed with `backticks` if the title looks like a lang item. This PR changes the lint to only run on internal links. External links, indicated by `http` or `https`, are skipped.
This PR also reorganises `pulldown_cmark` imports to bypass the clippy lint enforcing 100 line functions.
---
changelog: Stop doc_markdown requiring backticks on links to external websites
Add the `transmute_int_to_non_zero` lint
Fixes#10288
This adds a new complexity lint `transmute_int_to_non_zero` which checks for transmutes to any of the `NonZero*` types, and suggests their `new_unchecked` method instead.
r? `@llogiq`
changelog: New lint: [`transmute_int_to_non_zero`]
Add question-mark-used lint
This lint complains when the question mark operator (try operator) is used. This is a restriction lint that can be useful on local scopes where a custom error handling macro is supposed to be used to augment the error based on local scope data before returning.
Fixes#10340
---
changelog: New lint [`question_mark_used`]
[#10342](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10342)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Add `let_underscore_untyped`
Fixes#6842
This adds a new pedantic `let_underscore_untyped` lint which checks for `let _ = <expr>`, and suggests to either provide a type annotation, or to remove the `let` keyword. That way the author is forced to specify the type they intended to ignore, and thus get forced to re-visit the decision should the type of `<expr>` change. Alternatively, they can drop the `let` keyword to truly just ignore the value no matter what.
r? `@llogiq`
changelog: New lint: [let_underscore_untyped]
[significant_drop_tightening] Add MVP
cc #9399
Creates the lint with minimum functionalities, which is a good start IMO.
---
changelog: new lint: [`significant_drop_tightening`]
[#10163](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10163)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Change unusual_byte_groupings to require byte groupings of equal size
Fixes issue #6556
This lint required byte groupings of size 2 or 4 for `Radix::Binary` and `Radix::Hexadecimal`. Since there are good reasons for allowing groups of other sizes, this PR relaxes the restriction. This lint now requires that
- group sizes after the first group be of the same size and
- greater or equal in size to the first group.
---
changelog: [`unusual_byte_groupings`]: reduce false positives by relaxing restriction requiring groups of specific sizes.
Use `target` instead of `machine` for mir interpreter integer handling.
The naming of `machine` only makes sense from a mir interpreter internals perspective, but outside users talk about the `target` platform. As per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/108029#issuecomment-1429791015
r? `@RalfJung`
As this is a lint about "style", and a purely cosmetical choice (using `<A: Trait>` over `impl Trait`), a lot of other files needed to be allowed this lint.
Avoid accessing HIR when it can be avoided
Experiment to see if it helps some incremental cases.
Will be rebased once https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107942 gets merged.
r? `@ghost`
Ignore synthetic type parameters for `extra_unused_type_parameters`
There was a minor bug around calculating spans when forming the help message. An example:
```rust
fn unused_opaque<A, B>(dummy: impl Default) {}
// ^^ ^
```
In this case, the entire list of generics should be highlighted, instead of each individual parameter. The culprit is the `impl Default`, which registers as a type parameter but doesn't live within the `<...>`. Because synthetic parameters can't ever be manually created, we just ignore them for this lint.
r? `@flip1995`
changelog: none
<!-- changelog_checked -->
Fix false positives for `extra_unused_type_parameters`
Don't lint external macros. Also, if the function body is empty, any type parameters with bounds on them are not linted. Note that only the body needs be empty - this rule still applies if the function takes any arguments.
fixes#10318fixes#10319
changelog: none
<!-- changelog_checked -->
uninlined_format_args: do not inline argument with generic parameters
Fix#10339
---
changelog: FP: [`uninlined_format_args`]: No longer lints for arguments with generic parameters
[#10343](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10343)
<!-- changelog_checked -->
fix [`needless_return`] incorrect suggestion when returning if sequence
fixes: #10049
---
changelog: [`needless_return`]: fix incorrect suggestion on if sequence
Liberate late-bound regions rather than erasing them in `needless_pass_by_value`
changelog: [`needless_pass_by_value`]: fixes an ICE when there are late-bound regions in function arguments that are needlessly passed by value
Fixesrust-lang/rust#107147
r? `@matthiaskrgr`
manual_let_else: let/else is not divergent by default
The divergent `else` block of a `let`/`else` statement does not make the `let/else` statement itself divergent.
Fixes#10296
changelog: [`manual_let_else`]: do not consider `let`/`else` to be divergent by default
