lcnr
647052fc04
remove the Subst trait, always use EarlyBinder
2022-09-19 11:37:27 +02:00
bors
efa717bc2d
Auto merge of #101924 - jackh726:revert-static-hrtb-error, r=compiler-errors
...
Re-add HRTB implied static bug note
r? `@compiler-errors` since you reviewed it previously
I deleted a `normalize` call and forgot about it. Whoops.
2022-09-19 04:56:14 +00:00
Jack Huey
e7ca6e1b47
Use Predicate ConstraintCategory when normalizing
2022-09-17 11:46:05 -04:00
Dylan DPC
3ad81e0dd8
Rollup merge of #93628 - est31:stabilize_let_else, r=joshtriplett
...
Stabilize `let else`
🎉 **Stabilizes the `let else` feature, added by [RFC 3137](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3137 ).** 🎉
Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1156
closes #87335 (`let else` tracking issue)
FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1029383585
----------
## Stabilization report
### Summary
The feature allows refutable patterns in `let` statements if the expression is
followed by a diverging `else`:
```Rust
fn get_count_item(s: &str) -> (u64, &str) {
let mut it = s.split(' ');
let (Some(count_str), Some(item)) = (it.next(), it.next()) else {
panic!("Can't segment count item pair: '{s}'");
};
let Ok(count) = u64::from_str(count_str) else {
panic!("Can't parse integer: '{count_str}'");
};
(count, item)
}
assert_eq!(get_count_item("3 chairs"), (3, "chairs"));
```
### Differences from the RFC / Desugaring
Outside of desugaring I'm not aware of any differences between the implementation and the RFC. The chosen desugaring has been changed from the RFC's [original](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3137-let-else.html#reference-level-explanations ). You can read a detailed discussion of the implementation history of it in `@cormacrelf` 's [summary](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1041143670 ) in this thread, as well as the [followup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1046598419 ). Since that followup, further changes have happened to the desugaring, in #98574 , #99518 , #99954 . The later changes were mostly about the drop order: On match, temporaries drop in the same order as they would for a `let` declaration. On mismatch, temporaries drop before the `else` block.
### Test cases
In chronological order as they were merged.
Added by df9a2e0687#87688 ):
* [`ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs ) to ensure the unreachable pattern lint visits patterns inside `let else`.
Added by 5b95df4bdc#87688 ):
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs ) to ensure that no lazy boolean expressions (using `&&` or `||`) are allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs ) to ensure that no `}` directly preceding the `else` is allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs ) to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for the `else` block.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs ) to ensure that the `irrefutable_let_patterns` lint fires.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs ) to ensure the presence of semicolons at the end of the `let` statement.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs ) to ensure the `else` block diverges.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs ) to ensure the feature works in some simple test case settings.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs ) to ensure the bindings created by the outer `let` expression are not available in the `else` block of it.
Added by bf7c32a447#89965 ):
* [`ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs ) as a regression test for the ICE-on-error bug #89960 . Later in 102b9125e1856541963c#89974 ):
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs ) to test for the improved error message that points out that `let else if` is not possible.
Added by 9b45713b6chttps://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs ) as a regression test for #89807 , to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for bindings created by the `let else` pattern.
Added by 61bcd8d307#89841 ):
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs ) to ensure that a copy is performed out of non-copy wrapper types. This mirrors `if let` behaviour. The test case bases on rustc internal changes originally meant for #89933 but then removed from the PR due to the error prior to the improvements of #89841 .
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs ) to ensure that while there is a move of the binding in the successful case, the `else` case can still access the non-matching value. This mirrors `if let` behaviour.
Added by 102b9125e1#89841 ):
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs ) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs ) to check `ref` and `ref mut` keywords in the pattern work correctly and error when needed.
Added by 2715c5f984#89841 ):
* Match ergonomic tests adapted from the `rfc2005` test suite.
Added by fec8a507a2#89841 ):
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs ) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs ) to check deref coercions.
#### Added since this stabilization report was originally written (2022-02-09)
Added by 76ea566677#94211 ):
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.63.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs ) to give a nice error message if an user tries to do an assignment with a (possibly refutable) pattern and an `else` block, like asked for in #93995 .
Added by e7730dcb7e#94208 ):
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs ) to test whether `#[allow(unused_variables)]` works in the expr, as well as its non presence, as well as putting it on the entire `let else` *affects* the expr, too. This was adding a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.
* Expansion of `ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs` and `ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs` to ensure that non-presence of `#[allow(unused)]` does issue the unused lint. This was adding a missing test case as pointed out by the stabilization report.
Added by 5bd71063b3#94208 ):
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs ), a regression test for #92069 , which got fixed without addition of a regression test. This resolves a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.
Added by 5374688e1d#98574 ):
* [`src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs ) to test the interaction of async/await with `let else`
Added by 6c529ded86#98574 ):
* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs ) as a (partial) regression test for #98672
Added by 9b56640106#99518 ):
* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs ) as a regression test for #93951
* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #98672 (especially regarding `else` drop order)
Added by baf9a7cb57#99518 ):
* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #93951 , similar to `let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`
Added by 60be2de8b7#99518 ):
* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a program that can now be compiled thanks to borrow checker implications of #99518
Added by 47a7a91c96#100132 ):
* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs ), as a regression test for #100103 , to ensure that there is no ICE when doing `Err(...)?` inside else blocks.
Added by e3c5bd617d#100443 ):
* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs ), to verify that there is no unreachable code error with the current desugaring.
Added by 981852677c#100443 ):
* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs ), to make sure that a correct span is emitted for a missing trailing expression error. Regression test for #94176 .
Added by e182d12a84#100434 ):
* [src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs ), as a regression test to ensure pretty printing works for `let else` (this bug surfaced in many different ways)
Added by e26285603c#99954 ):
* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs ) extended to contain & borrows as well, as this was identified as an earlier issue with the desugaring: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98672#issuecomment-1200196921
Added by 2d8460ef43#99291 ):
* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs ) a matrix based test for various drop order behaviour of `let else`. Especially, it verifies equality of `let` and `let else` drop orders, [resolving](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1238498468 ) a [stabilization blocker](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523 ).
Added by 1b87ce0d40#101410 ):
* Edit to `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to add the `-Zvalidate-mir` flag, as a regression test for #99228
Added by af591ebe4d#101410 ):
* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs ) as a regression test for the ICE #99975 .
Added by this PR:
* `ui/let-else/let-else.rs`, a simple run-pass check, similar to `ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`.
### Things not currently tested
* ~~The `#[allow(...)]` tests check whether allow works, but they don't check whether the non-presence of allow causes a lint to fire.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~There is no `#[allow(...)]` test for the expression, as there are tests for the pattern and the else block.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~`let-else-brace-before-else.rs` forbids the `let ... = {} else {}` pattern and there is a rustfix to obtain `let ... = ({}) else {}`. I'm not sure whether the `.fixed` files are checked by the tooling that they compile. But if there is no such check, it would be neat to make sure that `let ... = ({}) else {}` compiles.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~#92069 got closed as fixed, but no regression test was added. Not sure it's worth to add one.~~ → *test added by 5bd71063b3810d977aa376d1e6dd7cec359330cc*
* ~~consistency between `let else` and `if let` regarding lifetimes and drop order: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523~~ → *test added by 2d8460ef43d902f34ba2133fe38f66ee8d2fdafc*
Edit: they are all tested now.
### Possible future work / Refutable destructuring assignments
[RFC 2909](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2909-destructuring-assignment.html ) specifies destructuring assignment, allowing statements like `FooBar { a, b, c } = foo();`.
As it was stabilized, destructuring assignment only allows *irrefutable* patterns, which before the advent of `let else` were the only patterns that `let` supported.
So the combination of `let else` and destructuring assignments gives reason to think about extensions of the destructuring assignments feature that allow refutable patterns, discussed in #93995 .
A naive mapping of `let else` to destructuring assignments in the form of `Some(v) = foo() else { ... };` might not be the ideal way. `let else` needs a diverging `else` clause as it introduces new bindings, while assignments have a default behaviour to fall back to if the pattern does not match, in the form of not performing the assignment. Thus, there is no good case to require divergence, or even an `else` clause at all, beyond the need for having *some* introducer syntax so that it is clear to readers that the assignment is not a given (enums and structs look similar). There are better candidates for introducer syntax however than an empty `else {}` clause, like `maybe` which could be added as a keyword on an edition boundary:
```Rust
let mut v = 0;
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v);
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v) else { bar() };
```
Further design discussion is left to an RFC, or the linked issue.
2022-09-17 15:31:06 +05:30
bors
c524c7dd25
Auto merge of #98588 - b-naber:valtrees-cleanup, r=lcnr
...
Use only ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()> in type system
r? `@lcnr`
2022-09-17 03:04:22 +00:00
Jack Huey
e09242d5b8
Final bits
2022-09-16 17:47:53 -04:00
Jack Huey
f1767dbb42
Add ExtraConstraintInfo
2022-09-16 17:33:12 -04:00
Jack Huey
ec17be2656
Add outlives_constraint to BlameConstraint
2022-09-16 17:08:35 -04:00
Jack Huey
6075877c89
Pass ConstraintCategory thorough a few more places
2022-09-16 16:44:18 -04:00
Jack Huey
a46376e247
Make QueryOutlivesConstraint contain a ConstraintCategory
2022-09-16 16:15:41 -04:00
Jack Huey
92b759f517
Revert "Better errors for implied static bound"
...
This reverts commit c75817b0a7
2022-09-16 09:47:07 -04:00
Jack Huey
bba514b7b4
Revert "Use Predicate ConstraintCategory when normalizing"
...
This reverts commit aae37f8763
2022-09-16 09:01:28 -04:00
b-naber
d77248e6d2
nits
2022-09-15 22:27:41 +02:00
est31
173eb6f407
Only enable the let_else feature on bootstrap
...
On later stages, the feature is already stable.
Result of running:
rg -l "feature.let_else" compiler/ src/librustdoc/ library/ | xargs sed -s -i "s#\\[feature.let_else#\\[cfg_attr\\(bootstrap, feature\\(let_else\\)#"
2022-09-15 21:06:45 +02:00
bors
6153d3cbe6
Auto merge of #101212 - eholk:dyn-star, r=compiler-errors
...
Initial implementation of dyn*
This PR adds extremely basic and incomplete support for [dyn*](https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps//blog/2022/03/29/dyn-can-we-make-dyn-sized/ ). The goal is to get something in tree behind a flag to make collaboration easier, and also to make sure the implementation so far is not unreasonable. This PR does quite a few things:
* Introduce `dyn_star` feature flag
* Adds parsing for `dyn* Trait` types
* Defines `dyn* Trait` as a sized type
* Adds support for explicit casts, like `42usize as dyn* Debug`
* Including const evaluation of such casts
* Adds codegen for drop glue so things are cleaned up properly when a `dyn* Trait` object goes out of scope
* Adds codegen for method calls, at least for methods that take `&self`
Quite a bit is still missing, but this gives us a starting point. Note that this is never intended to become stable surface syntax for Rust, but rather `dyn*` is planned to be used as an implementation detail for async functions in dyn traits.
Joint work with `@nikomatsakis` and `@compiler-errors.`
r? `@bjorn3`
2022-09-14 18:10:51 +00:00
b-naber
6af8fb7936
address review again
2022-09-14 17:30:25 +02:00
Jack Huey
aae37f8763
Use Predicate ConstraintCategory when normalizing
2022-09-13 20:18:49 -04:00
Jack Huey
c75817b0a7
Better errors for implied static bound
2022-09-13 20:18:04 -04:00
Jack Huey
ff623ffc39
Cleanup retrieve_closure_constraint_info
2022-09-13 19:58:53 -04:00
Jack Huey
2be6301857
Remove unused body args
2022-09-13 19:58:53 -04:00
Camille GILLOT
494af379c4
Use def_span for external requirements.
2022-09-13 19:18:24 +02:00
Camille GILLOT
1f370d9437
Use tcx.hir() utils for spans in MIR building.
...
This corrects the `span_with_body` in the case of closures, which was
incorrectly shortened to the `def_span`.
2022-09-13 19:18:23 +02:00
Camille GILLOT
ffe20d61d6
Only keep one version of ImplicitSelfKind.
2022-09-13 19:18:23 +02:00
b-naber
bea0a6dc84
address review
2022-09-13 17:44:53 +02:00
b-naber
372c4fd67f
remove visit_const from mir visitors
2022-09-13 17:44:52 +02:00
b-naber
2554fa1c8e
renumber regions in mir constants correctly
2022-09-13 17:41:02 +02:00
b-naber
a4bbb8db5c
use ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()> in type system
2022-09-13 17:40:59 +02:00
Michael Goulet
b2ed2dcaae
Rename some variants
2022-09-12 16:55:59 -07:00
Eric Holk
549c105bb3
dyn* through more typechecking and MIR
2022-09-12 16:55:56 -07:00
KaDiWa
66211d83f9
Avoid Iterator::last
2022-09-11 17:23:00 +02:00
bors
2287107588
Auto merge of #98559 - jackh726:remove-reempty, r=oli-obk
...
Remove ReEmpty
r? rust-lang/types
2022-09-10 20:54:01 +00:00
Camille GILLOT
05812df603
Handle generic parameters.
2022-09-09 01:31:46 +00:00
Jack Huey
1ca9eb8ec3
Remove ReEmpty
2022-09-08 20:55:55 -04:00
Jack Huey
e7e5feb637
In ReverseMapper, don't fallback to ReEmpty, instead ReStatic
2022-09-08 17:57:34 -04:00
Jack Huey
f29c91bf12
Create VarValue::Empty
2022-09-08 17:57:32 -04:00
Dylan DPC
720a82dd52
Rollup merge of #101545 - TaKO8Ki:remove-unnecessary-partialord-ord, r=oli-obk
...
Remove unnecessary `PartialOrd` and `Ord`
2022-09-08 20:48:38 +05:30
Takayuki Maeda
bdc865d8f7
remove unnecessary PartialOrd and Ord
2022-09-08 06:15:33 +09:00
Oli Scherer
a0130e62ec
Check all operands, they may contain indirections in their place
2022-09-06 15:32:35 +00:00
Oli Scherer
b7413511dc
Generalize the Assume intrinsic statement to a general Intrinsic statement
2022-09-06 14:18:32 +00:00
Oli Scherer
3f07645120
Lower the assume intrinsic to a MIR statement
2022-09-06 14:18:32 +00:00
bors
6c358c67d4
Auto merge of #101241 - camsteffen:refactor-binding-annotations, r=cjgillot
...
`BindingAnnotation` refactor
* `ast::BindingMode` is deleted and replaced with `hir::BindingAnnotation` (which is moved to `ast`)
* `BindingAnnotation` is changed from an enum to a tuple struct e.g. `BindingAnnotation(ByRef::No, Mutability::Mut)`
* Associated constants added for convenience `BindingAnnotation::{NONE, REF, MUT, REF_MUT}`
One goal is to make it more clear that `BindingAnnotation` merely represents syntax `ref mut` and not the actual binding mode. This was especially confusing since we had `ast::BindingMode`->`hir::BindingAnnotation`->`thir::BindingMode`.
I wish there were more symmetry between `ByRef` and `Mutability` (variant) naming (maybe `Mutable::Yes`?), and I also don't love how long the name `BindingAnnotation` is, but this seems like the best compromise. Ideas welcome.
2022-09-06 03:16:29 +00:00
bors
b44197abb0
Auto merge of #101261 - TaKO8Ki:separate-receiver-from-arguments-in-hir, r=cjgillot
...
Separate the receiver from arguments in HIR
Related to #100232
cc `@cjgillot`
2022-09-05 16:21:40 +00:00
Takayuki Maeda
9cde34e180
use propagate_through_exprs instead of propagate_through_expr
...
fix `ExprKind` static_assert_size
fix hir-stats
2022-09-05 23:11:34 +09:00
bors
2dc703fd6e
Auto merge of #101228 - nnethercote:simplify-hir-PathSegment, r=petrochenkov
...
Simplify `hir::PathSegment`
r? `@petrochenkov`
2022-09-05 13:36:54 +00:00
Takayuki Maeda
fea1c5f5c8
refactor: remove unnecessary variables
2022-09-05 22:31:02 +09:00
Takayuki Maeda
87c6da363f
separate the receiver from arguments in HIR
2022-09-05 22:25:49 +09:00
Michael Goulet
41d4ea2314
Don't suggest reborrow if usage is inside a closure
2022-09-05 04:27:07 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
bb0ae3c446
Make hir::PathSegment::hir_id non-optional.
2022-09-05 14:20:25 +10:00
Cameron Steffen
02ba216e3c
Refactor and re-use BindingAnnotation
2022-09-02 12:55:05 -05:00
Matthias Krüger
1bafe0b020
Rollup merge of #101285 - TaKO8Ki:do-not-suggest-adding-move-when-closure-is-already-marked-as-move, r=oli-obk
...
Do not suggest adding `move` to closure when `move` is already used
Fixes #101227
2022-09-01 21:37:21 +02:00
