Downgrade unreadable_literal to pedantic
As motivated by #5418. This is the top most commonly suppressed Clippy style lint, which indicates that the community has decided they don't share Clippy's opinion on the best style of this.
I've left the lint in as pedantic, though it could be that "restriction" would be better -- I can see this lint being useful as an opt-in restriction in some codebases.
changelog: Remove unreadable_literal from default set of enabled lints
Add new lint for `Result<T, E>.map_or(None, Some(T))`
Fixes#5414
PR Checklist
---
- [x] Followed lint naming conventions (the name is a bit awkward, but it seems to conform)
- [x] Added passing UI tests (including committed .stderr file)
- [x] cargo test passes locally
- [x] Executed cargo dev update_lints
- [x] Added lint documentation
- [x] Run cargo dev fmt
`Result<T, E>` has an [`ok()`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/result/enum.Result.html#method.ok) method that adapts a `Result<T,E>` into an `Option<T>`.
It's possible to get around this adapter by writing `Result<T,E>.map_or(None, Some)`.
This lint is implemented as a new variant of the existing [`option_map_none` lint](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/2128)
Downgrade inefficient_to_string to pedantic
From the [documentation](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#inefficient_to_string):
> ```diff
> - ["foo", "bar"].iter().map(|s| s.to_string());
>
> + ["foo", "bar"].iter().map(|&s| s.to_string());
> ```
I feel like saving 10 nanoseconds from the formatting machinery isn't worth asking the programmer to insert extra `&` / `*` noise in the *vast* majority of cases. This is a pedantic lint.
changelog: Remove inefficient_to_string from default set of enabled lints
Downgrade trivially_copy_pass_by_ref to pedantic
The rationale for this lint is documented as:
> In many calling conventions instances of structs will be passed through registers if they fit into two or less general purpose registers.
I think the purported performance benefits of clippy's recommendation are overstated. This isn't worth asking people to sprinkle code with more `*``*``&``*``&` to chase the alleged performance.
This should be a pedantic lint that is disabled by default and opted in if some specific performance sensitive codebase determines that it is worthwhile.
As a reminder, a typical place that a reference to a primitive would come up is if the function is used as a filter. Triggering a performance-oriented lint on this type of code is the definition of pedantic.
```rust
fn filter(_n: &i32) -> bool {
true
}
fn main() {
let v = vec![1, 2, 3];
v.iter().copied().filter(filter).for_each(drop);
}
```
```console
warning: this argument (4 byte) is passed by reference, but would be more efficient if passed by value (limit: 8 byte)
--> src/main.rs:1:15
|
1 | fn filter(_n: &i32) -> bool {
| ^^^^ help: consider passing by value instead: `i32`
```
changelog: Remove trivially_copy_pass_by_ref from default set of enabled lints
Downgrade let_unit_value to pedantic
Given that the false positive in #1502 is marked E-hard and I don't have much hope of it getting fixed, I think it would be wise to disable this lint by default. I have had to suppress this lint in every substantial codebase (\>100k line) I have worked in. Any time this lint is being triggered, it's always the false positive case.
The motivation for this lint is documented as:
> A unit value cannot usefully be used anywhere. So binding one is kind of pointless.
with this example:
> ```rust
> let x = {
> 1;
> };
> ```
Sure, but the author would find this out via an unused_variable warning or from `x` not being the type that they need further down. If there ends up being a type error on `x`, clippy's advice isn't going to help get the code compiling because it can only run if the code already compiles.
changelog: Remove let_unit_value from default set of enabled lints
Fix update_lints
This fixes a bug in update_lints, where `internal` lints were not registered properly. This also cleans up some code. For example: The code generation functions no longer filter the lints the are given. This is now the task of the caller. This way, it is more obvious in the `replace_in_file` calls which lints will be included in which part of a file.
This also turns the lint modules private. There is no need for them to be public, since shared code should be in the utils module anyway.
And last but not least, this fixes the `register_lints` code generation, so also internal lints get registered.
changelog: none
Result<T, E> has an `ok()` method that adapts a Result<T,E> into an Option<T>.
It's possible to get around this adapter by writing Result<T,E>.map_or(None, Some).
This lint is implemented as a new variant of the existing
[`option_map_none` lint](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/2128)
useless Rc<Rc<T>>, Rc<Box<T>>, Rc<&T>, Box<&T>
refers to #2394
changelog: Add lints for Rc<Rc<T>> and Rc<Box<T>> and Rc<&T>, Box<&T>
this is based on top of another change #5310 so probably should go after that one.
Downgrade option_option to pedantic
Based on a search of my work codebase (\>500k lines) for `Option<Option<`, it looks like a bunch of reasonable uses to me. The documented motivation for this lint is:
> an optional optional value is logically the same thing as an optional value but has an unneeded extra level of wrapping
which seems a bit bogus in practice. For example a typical usage would look like:
```rust
let mut host: Option<String> = None;
let mut port: Option<i32> = None;
let mut payload: Option<Option<String>> = None;
for each field {
match field.name {
"host" => host = Some(...),
"port" => port = Some(...),
"payload" => payload = Some(...), // can be null or string
_ => return error,
}
}
let host = host.ok_or(...)?;
let port = port.ok_or(...)?;
let payload = payload.ok_or(...)?;
do_thing(host, port, payload)
```
This lint seems to fit right in with the pedantic group; I don't think linting on occurrences of `Option<Option<T>>` by default is justified.
---
changelog: Remove option_option from default set of enabled lints
