In the older version, a `.o` and ` .bc` file were separate
work-products. This newer version keeps, for each codegen-unit, a set
of files of different kinds. We assume that if any kinds are available
then all the kinds we need are available, since the precise set of
switches will depend on attributes and command-line switches.
Should probably test this: the effect of changing attributes in
particular might not be successfully tracked?
This checks the `previous_work_products` data from the dep-graph and
tries to simply copy a `.o` file if possible. We also add new
work-products into the dep-graph, and create edges to/from the dep-node
for a work-product.
Currently, calling abs() on one of the signed integer types might panic (in
debug mode at least) because the absolute value of the largest negative value
can not be represented in that signed type. Unlike all other integer
operations, there is currently not a non-panicking version on this function.
This seems to just be an oversight in the design, therefore just adding it now.
We used to use `Name`, but the session outlives the tokenizer, which
means that attempts to read this field after trans has complete
otherwise panic. All reads want an `InternedString` anyhow.
A work product right now is just a `.o` file. In the future it probably
includes other kinds of files, such as `.bc` files saving the
unoptimized LLVM IR.
However, because WorkProductIds must be independent of DefIds, so that
they don't need translation, this system may not be suitable *as is* for
storing fine-grained information (such as the MIR for individual defs),
as it was originally intended. We will want to refactor some for that.
Make vec::Drain and binary_heap::Drain covariant
I removed all mutable pointers/references, and added covariance tests similar to the ones in #32635. It builds and passes the tests, but I noticed that there weren't any tests of Drain's behaviour (at least not in libcollectionstest), so I'm not sure if my changes accidently broke Drain's behaviour. Should I add some tests for that (and if so, what should the tests include)?
Make vec::Drain and binary_heap::Drain covariant
I removed all mutable pointers/references, and added covariance tests similar to the ones in #32635. It builds and passes the tests, but I noticed that there weren't any tests of Drain's behaviour (at least not in libcollectionstest), so I'm not sure if my changes accidently broke Drain's behaviour. Should I add some tests for that (and if so, what should the tests include)?
std: Fix usage of SOCK_CLOEXEC
This code path was intended to only get executed on Linux, but unfortunately the
`cfg!` was malformed so it actually never got executed.
Centralize and clean type error reporting
Refactors the code that handles type errors to be cleaner and fixes various edge cases.
This made the already-bad "type mismatch resolving" error message somewhat uglier. I want to fix that in another commit before this PR is merged.
Fixes#31173
r? @jonathandturner, cc @nikomatsakis
Since we can know which targets are instantiable on a particular host,
it does not make sense to list invalid targets in the target print code.
Filter the list of targets to only include the targets that can be
instantiated.
Expand the supported_targets!() macro to also generate a set of
JSON encode/decode tests to verify that the parser will encode
and decode all of the fields needed for all of the builtin targets.
Additionally, add PartialEq to Target and TargetOptions in support
of the tests.
Change all the target generation functions to return a Result<Target,
String> so that targets that are unable to be instantiated can be
expressed as an Err instead of a panic!(). This should improve #33497 as
well.
Target's can already be built up from JSON files as well as built into
librustc_back so this adds the ability to convert any Target back into
JSON.
Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
Not all TargetOptions are exposed via the JSON interface to create
different targets. This exposes all the missing items and reorders them
to match the structure so that it is easier in the future to identify
missing items.
Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
