Expand the primary span of E0277 when the immediate unmet bound is not what the user wrote:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `i32: Bar` is not satisfied
--> f100.rs:6:6
|
6 | <i32 as Foo>::foo();
| ^^^ the trait `Bar` is not implemented for `i32`, which is required by `i32: Foo`
|
help: this trait has no implementations, consider adding one
--> f100.rs:2:1
|
2 | trait Bar {}
| ^^^^^^^^^
note: required for `i32` to implement `Foo`
--> f100.rs:3:14
|
3 | impl<T: Bar> Foo for T {}
| --- ^^^ ^
| |
| unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
```
Fix#40120.
Don't ICE if TAIT-defining fn contains a closure with `_` in return type
The `delay_span_bug` got added in 0e82aaeb67 to reduce the amount of errors emitted for functions that have `_` in their return type, because inference doesn't apply to function items. But this logic shouldn't apply to closures, because their return types *can* be inferred.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119916.
fix fn/const items implied bounds and wf check (rebase)
A rebase of #104098, see that PR for discussion. This is pretty much entirely the work of `@aliemjay.` I received his permission for this rebase.
---
These are two distinct changes (edit: actually three, see below):
1. Wf-check all fn item args. This is a soundness fix.
Fixes#104005
2. Use implied bounds from impl header in borrowck of associated functions/consts. This strictly accepts more code and helps to mitigate the impact of other breaking changes.
Fixes#98852Fixes#102611
The first is a breaking change and will likely have a big impact without the the second one. See the first commit for how it breaks libstd.
Landing the second one without the first will allow more incorrect code to pass. For example an exploit of #104005 would be as simple as:
```rust
use core::fmt::Display;
trait ExtendLt<Witness> {
fn extend(self) -> Box<dyn Display>;
}
impl<T: Display> ExtendLt<&'static T> for T {
fn extend(self) -> Box<dyn Display> {
Box::new(self)
}
}
fn main() {
let val = (&String::new()).extend();
println!("{val}");
}
```
The third change is to to check WF of user type annotations before normalizing them (fixes#104764, fixes#104763). It is mutually dependent on the second change above: an attempt to land it separately in #104746 caused several crater regressions that can all be mitigated by using the implied from the impl header. It is also necessary for the soundness of associated consts that use the implied bounds of impl header. See #104763 and how the third commit fixes the soundness issue in `tests/ui/wf/wf-associated-const.rs` that was introduces by the previous commit.
r? types
`-Ztreat-err-as-bug` treats normal errors and delayed bugs equally,
which can lead to some really surprising results.
This commit changes `-Ztreat-err-as-bug` so it ignores delayed bugs,
unless they get promoted to proper bugs and are printed.
This feels to me much simpler and more logical. And it simplifies the
implementation:
- The `-Ztreat-err-as-bug` check is removed from in
`DiagCtxt::{delayed_bug,span_delayed_bug}`.
- `treat_err_as_bug` doesn't need to count delayed bugs.
- The `-Ztreat-err-as-bug` panic message is simpler, because it doesn't
have to mention delayed bugs.
Output of delayed bugs is now more consistent. They're always printed
the same way. Previously when they triggered `-Ztreat-err-as-bug` they
would be printed slightly differently, via `span_bug` in
`span_delayed_bug` or `delayed_bug`.
A minor behaviour change: the "no errors encountered even though
`span_delayed_bug` issued" printed before delayed bugs is now a note
rather than a bug. This is done so it doesn't get counted as an error
that might trigger `-Ztreat-err-as-bug`, which would be silly.
This means that if you use `-Ztreat-err-as-bug=1` and there are no
normal errors but there are delayed bugs, the first delayed bug will be
shown (and the panic will happen after it's printed).
Also, I have added a second note saying "those delayed bugs will now be
shown as internal compiler errors". I think this makes it clearer what
is happening, because the whole concept of delayed bugs is non-obvious.
There are some test changes.
- equality-in-canonical-query.rs: Minor output changes, and the error
count reduces by one because the "no errors encountered even though
`span_delayed_bug` issued" message is no longer counted as an error.
- rpit_tait_equality_in_canonical_query.rs: Ditto.
- storage-live.rs: The query stack disappears because these delayed bugs
are now printed at the end, rather than when they are created.
- storage-return.rs, span_delayed_bug.rs: now need
`-Zeagerly-emit-delayed-bugs` because they need the delayed bugs
emitted immediately to preserve behaviour.
Hide foreign `#[doc(hidden)]` paths in import suggestions
Stops the compiler from suggesting to import foreign `#[doc(hidden)]` paths.
```@rustbot``` label A-suggestion-diagnostics
new solver normalization improvements
cool beans
At the core of this PR is a `try_normalize_ty` which stops for rigid aliases by using `commit_if_ok`.
Reworks alias-relate to fully normalize both the lhs and rhs and then equate the resulting rigid (or inference) types. This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/68 by avoiding the exponential blowup. Also supersedes #116369 by only defining opaque types if the hidden type is rigid.
I removed the stability check in `EvalCtxt::evaluate_goal` due to https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/75. While I personally have opinions on how to fix it, that still requires further t-types/`@nikomatsakis` buy-in, so I removed that for now. Once we've decided on our approach there, we can revert this commit.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Also consider TAIT to be uncomputable if the MIR body is tainted
Not totally sure if this is the best solution. We could, alternatively, look at the hir typeck results and try to take a type from there instead of just falling back to type error, inferring `u8` instead of `{type error}`. Not certain it really matters, though.
Happy to iterate on this.
Fixes#117413
r? ``@oli-obk`` cc ``@Nadrieril``
Don't normalize to an un-revealed opaque when we hit the recursion limit
Currently, we will normalize `Opaque := Option<&Opaque>` to something like `Option<&Option<&Option<&...Opaque>>>`, hitting a limit and bottoming out in an unnormalized opaque after the recursion limit gets hit.
Unfortunately, during `layout_of`, we'll simply recurse and try again if the type normalizes to something different than the type:
e6e931dda5/compiler/rustc_ty_utils/src/layout.rs (L58-L60)
That means then we'll try to normalize `Option<&Option<&Option<&...Opaque>>>` again, substituting `Opaque` into itself even deeper. Eventually this will get to the point that we're just stack-overflowing on a really deep type before even hitting an opaque again.
To fix this, we just bottom out into `ty::Error` instead of the unrevealed opaque type.
Fixes#117412
r? `@oli-obk`
Lint overlapping ranges as a separate pass
This reworks the [`overlapping_range_endpoints`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/nightly-rustc/rustc_lint_defs/builtin/static.OVERLAPPING_RANGE_ENDPOINTS.html) lint. My motivations are:
- It was annoying to have this lint entangled with the exhaustiveness algorithm, especially wrt librarification;
- This makes the lint behave consistently.
Here's the consistency story. Take the following matches:
```rust
match (0u8, true) {
(0..=10, true) => {}
(10..20, true) => {}
(10..20, false) => {}
_ => {}
}
match (true, 0u8) {
(true, 0..=10) => {}
(true, 10..20) => {}
(false, 10..20) => {}
_ => {}
}
```
There are two semantically consistent options: option 1 we lint all overlaps between the ranges, option 2 we only lint the overlaps that could actually occur (i.e. the ones with `true`). Option 1 is what this PR does. Option 2 is possible but would require the exhaustiveness algorithm to track more things for the sake of the lint. The status quo is that we're inconsistent between the two.
Option 1 generates more false postives, but I prefer it from a maintainer's perspective. I do think the difference is minimal; cases where the difference is observable seem rare.
This PR adds a separate pass, so this will have a perf impact. Let's see how bad, it looked ok locally.
Stash and cancel cycle errors for auto trait leakage in opaques
We don't need to emit a traditional cycle error when we have a selection error that explains what's going on but in more detail.
We may want to augment this error to actually point out the cycle, now that the cycle error is not being emitted. We could do that by storing the set of opaques that was in the `CyclePlaceholder` that gets returned from `type_of_opaque`.
r? `@oli-obk` cc `@estebank` #117235
