Merge ObjectSum and PolyTraitRef in AST/HIR + some other refactoring
`ObjectSum` and `PolyTraitRef` are the same thing (list of bounds), they exist separately only due to parser quirks. The second commit merges them.
The first commit replaces `Path` with `Ty` in (not yet supported) equality predicates. They are parsed as types anyway and arbitrary types can always be disguised as paths using aliases, so this doesn't add any new functionality.
The third commit uses `Vec` instead of `P<[T]>` in AST. AST is not immutable like HIR and `Vec`s are more convenient for it, unnecessary conversions are also avoided.
The last commit renames `parse_ty_sum` (which is used for parsing types in general) into `parse_ty`, and renames `parse_ty` (which is used restricted contexts where `+` is not permitted due to operator priorities or other reasons) into `parse_ty_no_plus`.
This is the first part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/39085#issuecomment-272743755 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/39080 focused on data changes and mechanical renaming, I'll submit a PR with parser changes a bit later.
r? @eddyb
* Add support for `#[proc_macro]`
* Reactivate `proc_macro` feature and gate `#[proc_macro_attribute]` under it
* Have `#![feature(proc_macro)]` imply `#![feature(use_extern_macros)]`,
error on legacy import of proc macros via `#[macro_use]`
This marks the pushpop_unsafe feature as removed inside the feature_gate.
It was added in commit 1829fa5199 and then
removed again in commit d399098fd8 .
Seems that the second commit forgot to mark it as removed in feature_gate.rs.
This enables us to remove another element from the whitelist of non gate
tested unstable lang features (issue #39059).
This removes the safe_suggestion feature from feature_gate.rs.
It was added in commit 164f0105bb
and then removed again in commit c11fe553df .
As the removal was in the same PR #38099 as the addition, we don't move it to
the "removed" section.
Removes an element from the whitelist of non gate tested unstable lang features (issue #39059).
syntax: enable attributes and cfg on struct fields
This enables conditional compilation of field initializers in a struct literal, simplifying construction of structs whose fields are themselves conditionally present. For example, the intializer for the constant in the following becomes legal, and has the intuitive effect:
```rust
struct Foo {
#[cfg(unix)]
bar: (),
}
const FOO: Foo = Foo {
#[cfg(unix)]
bar: (),
};
```
It's not clear to me whether this calls for the full RFC process, but the implementation was simple enough that I figured I'd begin the conversation with code.
Remove not(stage0) from deny(warnings)
Historically this was done to accommodate bugs in lints, but there hasn't been a
bug in a lint since this feature was added which the warnings affected. Let's
completely purge warnings from all our stages by denying warnings in all stages.
This will also assist in tracking down `stage0` code to be removed whenever
we're updating the bootstrap compiler.
This commit stabilizes the `proc_macro` and `proc_macro_lib` features in the
compiler to stabilize the "Macros 1.1" feature of the language. Many more
details can be found on the tracking issue, #35900.
Closes#35900
This commit introduces 128-bit integers. Stage 2 builds and produces a working compiler which
understands and supports 128-bit integers throughout.
The general strategy used is to have rustc_i128 module which provides aliases for iu128, equal to
iu64 in stage9 and iu128 later. Since nowhere in rustc we rely on large numbers being supported,
this strategy is good enough to get past the first bootstrap stages to end up with a fully working
128-bit capable compiler.
In order for this strategy to work, number of locations had to be changed to use associated
max_value/min_value instead of MAX/MIN constants as well as the min_value (or was it max_value?)
had to be changed to use xor instead of shift so both 64-bit and 128-bit based consteval works
(former not necessarily producing the right results in stage1).
This commit includes manual merge conflict resolution changes from a rebase by @est31.
Historically this was done to accommodate bugs in lints, but there hasn't been a
bug in a lint since this feature was added which the warnings affected. Let's
completely purge warnings from all our stages by denying warnings in all stages.
This will also assist in tracking down `stage0` code to be removed whenever
we're updating the bootstrap compiler.
PTX support, take 2
- You can generate PTX using `--emit=asm` and the right (custom) target. Which
then you can run on a NVIDIA GPU.
- You can compile `core` to PTX. [Xargo] also works and it can compile some
other crates like `collections` (but I doubt all of those make sense on a GPU)
[Xargo]: https://github.com/japaric/xargo
- You can create "global" functions, which can be "called" by the host, using
the `"ptx-kernel"` ABI, e.g. `extern "ptx-kernel" fn kernel() { .. }`. Every
other function is a "device" function and can only be called by the GPU.
- Intrinsics like `__syncthreads()` and `blockIdx.x` are available as
`"platform-intrinsics"`. These intrinsics are *not* in the `core` crate but
any Rust user can create "bindings" to them using an `extern
"platform-intrinsics"` block. See example at the end.
- Trying to emit PTX with `-g` (debuginfo); you get an LLVM error. But I don't
think PTX can contain debuginfo anyway so `-g` should be ignored and a warning
should be printed ("`-g` doesn't work with this target" or something).
- "Single source" support. You *can't* write a single source file that contains
both host and device code. I think that should be possible to implement that
outside the compiler using compiler plugins / build scripts.
- The equivalent to CUDA `__shared__` which it's used to declare memory that's
shared between the threads of the same block. This could be implemented using
attributes: `#[shared] static mut SCRATCH_MEMORY: [f32; 64]` but hasn't been
implemented yet.
- Built-in targets. This PR doesn't add targets to the compiler just yet but one
can create custom targets to be able to emit PTX code (see the example at the
end). The idea is to have people experiment with this feature before
committing to it (built-in targets are "insta-stable")
- All functions must be "inlined". IOW, the `.rlib` must always contain the LLVM
bitcode of all the functions of the crate it was produced from. Otherwise, you
end with "undefined references" in the final PTX code but you won't get *any*
linker error because no linker is involved. IOW, you'll hit a runtime error
when loading the PTX into the GPU. The workaround is to use `#[inline]` on
non-generic functions and to never use `#[inline(never)]` but this may not
always be possible because e.g. you could be relying on third party code.
- Should `--emit=asm` generate a `.ptx` file instead of a `.s` file?
TL;DR Use Xargo to turn a crate into a PTX module (a `.s` file). Then pass that
PTX module, as a string, to the GPU and run it.
The full code is in [this repository]. This section gives an overview of how to
run Rust code on a NVIDIA GPU.
[this repository]: https://github.com/japaric/cuda
- Create a custom target. Here's the 64-bit NVPTX target (NOTE: the comments
are not valid because this is supposed to be a JSON file; remove them before
you use this file):
``` js
// nvptx64-nvidia-cuda.json
{
"arch": "nvptx64", // matches LLVM
"cpu": "sm_20", // "oldest" compute capability supported by LLVM
"data-layout": "e-i64:64-v16:16-v32:32-n16:32:64",
"llvm-target": "nvptx64-nvidia-cuda",
"max-atomic-width": 0, // LLVM errors with any other value :-(
"os": "cuda", // matches LLVM
"panic-strategy": "abort",
"target-endian": "little",
"target-pointer-width": "64",
"target-vendor": "nvidia", // matches LLVM -- not required
}
```
(There's a 32-bit target specification in the linked repository)
- Write a kernel
``` rust
extern "platform-intrinsic" {
fn nvptx_block_dim_x() -> i32;
fn nvptx_block_idx_x() -> i32;
fn nvptx_thread_idx_x() -> i32;
}
/// Copies an array of `n` floating point numbers from `src` to `dst`
pub unsafe extern "ptx-kernel" fn memcpy(dst: *mut f32,
src: *const f32,
n: usize) {
let i = (nvptx_block_dim_x() as isize)
.wrapping_mul(nvptx_block_idx_x() as isize)
.wrapping_add(nvptx_thread_idx_x() as isize);
if (i as usize) < n {
*dst.offset(i) = *src.offset(i);
}
}
```
- Emit PTX code
```
$ xargo rustc --target nvptx64-nvidia-cuda --release -- --emit=asm
Compiling core v0.0.0 (file://..)
(..)
Compiling nvptx-builtins v0.1.0 (https://github.com/japaric/nvptx-builtins)
Compiling kernel v0.1.0
$ cat target/nvptx64-nvidia-cuda/release/deps/kernel-*.s
//
// Generated by LLVM NVPTX Back-End
//
.version 3.2
.target sm_20
.address_size 64
// .globl memcpy
.visible .entry memcpy(
.param .u64 memcpy_param_0,
.param .u64 memcpy_param_1,
.param .u64 memcpy_param_2
)
{
.reg .pred %p<2>;
.reg .s32 %r<5>;
.reg .s64 %rd<12>;
ld.param.u64 %rd7, [memcpy_param_2];
mov.u32 %r1, %ntid.x;
mov.u32 %r2, %ctaid.x;
mul.wide.s32 %rd8, %r2, %r1;
mov.u32 %r3, %tid.x;
cvt.s64.s32 %rd9, %r3;
add.s64 %rd10, %rd9, %rd8;
setp.ge.u64 %p1, %rd10, %rd7;
@%p1 bra LBB0_2;
ld.param.u64 %rd3, [memcpy_param_0];
ld.param.u64 %rd4, [memcpy_param_1];
cvta.to.global.u64 %rd5, %rd4;
cvta.to.global.u64 %rd6, %rd3;
shl.b64 %rd11, %rd10, 2;
add.s64 %rd1, %rd6, %rd11;
add.s64 %rd2, %rd5, %rd11;
ld.global.u32 %r4, [%rd2];
st.global.u32 [%rd1], %r4;
LBB0_2:
ret;
}
```
- Run it on the GPU
``` rust
// `kernel.ptx` is the `*.s` file we got in the previous step
const KERNEL: &'static str = include_str!("kernel.ptx");
driver::initialize()?;
let device = Device(0)?;
let ctx = device.create_context()?;
let module = ctx.load_module(KERNEL)?;
let kernel = module.function("memcpy")?;
let h_a: Vec<f32> = /* create some random data */;
let h_b = vec![0.; N];
let d_a = driver::allocate(bytes)?;
let d_b = driver::allocate(bytes)?;
// Copy from host to GPU
driver::copy(h_a, d_a)?;
// Run `memcpy` on the GPU
kernel.launch(d_b, d_a, N)?;
// Copy from GPU to host
driver::copy(d_b, h_b)?;
// Verify
assert_eq!(h_a, h_b);
// `d_a`, `d_b`, `h_a`, `h_b` are dropped/freed here
```
---
cc @alexcrichton @brson @rkruppe
> What has changed since #34195?
- `core` now can be compiled into PTX. Which makes it very easy to turn `no_std`
crates into "kernels" with the help of Xargo.
- There's now a way, the `"ptx-kernel"` ABI, to generate "global" functions. The
old PR required a manual step (it was hack) to "convert" "device" functions
into "global" functions. (Only "global" functions can be launched by the host)
- Everything is unstable. There are not "insta stable" built-in targets this
time (\*). The users have to use a custom target to experiment with this
feature. Also, PTX instrinsics, like `__syncthreads` and `blockIdx.x`, are now
implemented as `"platform-intrinsics"` so they no longer live in the `core`
crate.
(\*) I'd actually like to have in-tree targets because that makes this target
more discoverable, removes the need to lug around .json files, etc.
However, bundling a target with the compiler immediately puts it in the path
towards stabilization. Which gives us just two cycles to find and fix any
problem with the target specification. Afterwards, it becomes hard to tweak
the specification because that could be a breaking change.
A possible solution could be "unstable built-in targets". Basically, to use an
unstable target, you'll have to also pass `-Z unstable-options` to the compiler.
And unstable targets, being unstable, wouldn't be available on stable.
> Why should this be merged?
- To let people experiment with the feature out of tree. Having easy access to
the feature (in every nightly) allows this. I also think that, as it is, it
should be possible to start prototyping type-safe single source support using
build scripts, macros and/or plugins.
- It's a straightforward implementation. No different that adding support for
any other architecture.
- `--emit=asm --target=nvptx64-nvidia-cuda` can be used to turn a crate
into a PTX module (a `.s` file).
- intrinsics like `__syncthreads` and `blockIdx.x` are exposed as
`"platform-intrinsics"`.
- "cabi" has been implemented for the nvptx and nvptx64 architectures.
i.e. `extern "C"` works.
- a new ABI, `"ptx-kernel"`. That can be used to generate "global"
functions. Example: `extern "ptx-kernel" fn kernel() { .. }`. All
other functions are "device" functions.
Prevent where < ident > from parsing.
In order to be forward compatible with `where<'a>` syntax for higher
rank parameters, prevent potential conflicts with UFCS from parsing
correctly for the near term.
Allow legacy custom derive authors to disable warnings in downstream crates
This PR allows legacy custom derive authors to use a pre-deprecated method `registry.register_custom_derive()` instead of `registry.register_syntax_extension()` to avoid downstream deprecation warnings.
r? @nrc
Refactor global paths
This PR removes the field `global: bool` from `ast::Path` and `hir::Path`, instead representing a global path `::foo::bar` as `{{root}}::foo::bar`, where `{{root}}` is a virtual keyword `keywords::CrateRoot`.
Also, fixes#38016.
r? @nrc
Don't perform span mangling when building field/tup access nodes
There are no guarantees that the two spans used to create the new one
come from the same place or are even valid.
Fixes#36081.
In order to be forward compatible with `where<'a>` syntax for higher
rank parameters, prevent potential conflicts with UFCS from parsing
correctly for the near term.
annotate stricter lifetimes on LateLintPass methods to allow them to forward to a Visitor
this unblocks clippy (rustup blocked after #37918)
clippy has lots of lints that internally call an `intravisit::Visitor`, but the current lifetimes on `LateLintPass` methods conflicted with the required lifetimes (there was no connection between the HIR elements and the `TyCtxt`)
r? @Manishearth
Add new #[target_feature = "..."] attribute.
This commit adds a new attribute that instructs the compiler to emit
target specific code for a single function. For example, the following
function is permitted to use instructions that are part of SSE 4.2:
#[target_feature = "+sse4.2"]
fn foo() { ... }
In particular, use of this attribute does not require setting the
-C target-feature or -C target-cpu options on rustc.
This attribute does not have any protections built into it. For example,
nothing stops one from calling the above `foo` function on hosts without
SSE 4.2 support. Doing so may result in a SIGILL.
I've also expanded the x86 target feature whitelist.
This commit adds a new attribute that instructs the compiler to emit
target specific code for a single function. For example, the following
function is permitted to use instructions that are part of SSE 4.2:
#[target_feature = "+sse4.2"]
fn foo() { ... }
In particular, use of this attribute does not require setting the
-C target-feature or -C target-cpu options on rustc.
This attribute does not have any protections built into it. For example,
nothing stops one from calling the above `foo` function on hosts without
SSE 4.2 support. Doing so may result in a SIGILL.
This commit also expands the target feature whitelist to include lzcnt,
popcnt and sse4a. Namely, lzcnt and popcnt have their own CPUID bits,
but were introduced with SSE4.
Show multiline spans in full if short enough
When dealing with multiline spans that span few lines, show the complete span instead of restricting to the first character of the first line.
For example, instead of:
```
% ./rustc file2.rs
error[E0277]: the trait bound `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` is not satisfied
--> file2.rs:13:9
|
13 | foo(1 + bar(x,
| ^ trait `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` not satisfied
|
```
show
```
% ./rustc file2.rs
error[E0277]: the trait bound `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` is not satisfied
--> file2.rs:13:9
|
13 | foo(1 + bar(x,
| ________^ starting here...
14 | | y),
| |_____________^ ...ending here: trait `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` not satisfied
|
```
The [proposal in internals](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/proposal-for-multiline-span-comments/4242/6) outlines the reasoning behind this.
Support `?Sized` in where clauses
Implemented as described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/20503#issuecomment-258677026 - `?Trait` bounds are moved on type parameter definitions when possible, reported as errors otherwise.
(It'd be nice to unify bounds and where clauses in HIR, but this is mostly blocked by rustdoc now - it needs to render bounds in pleasant way and the best way to do it so far is to mirror what was written in source code.)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/20503
r? @nikomatsakis
Implement the `loop_break_value` feature.
This implements RFC 1624, tracking issue #37339.
- `FnCtxt` (in typeck) gets a stack of `LoopCtxt`s, which store the
currently deduced type of that loop, the desired type, and a list of
break expressions currently seen. `loop` loops get a fresh type
variable as their initial type (this logic is stolen from that for
arrays). `while` loops get `()`.
- `break {expr}` looks up the broken loop, and unifies the type of
`expr` with the type of the loop.
- `break` with no expr unifies the loop's type with `()`.
- When building MIR, loops no longer construct a `()` value at
termination of the loop; rather, the `break` expression assigns the
result of the loop.
- ~~I have also changed the loop scoping in MIR-building so that the test
of a while loop is not considered to be part of that loop. This makes
the rules consistent with #37360. The new loop scopes in typeck also
follow this rule. That means that `loop { while (break) {} }` now
terminates instead of looping forever. This is technically a breaking
change.~~
- ~~On that note, expressions like `while break {}` and `if break {}` no
longer parse because `{}` is interpreted as an expression argument to
`break`. But no code except compiler test cases should do that anyway
because it makes no sense.~~
- The RFC did not make it clear, but I chose to make `break ()` inside
of a `while` loop illegal, just in case we wanted to do anything with
that design space in the future.
This is my first time dealing with this part of rustc so I'm sure
there's plenty of problems to pick on here ^_^
When dealing with multiline spans that span few lines, show the complete
span instead of restricting to the first character of the first line.
For example, instead of:
```
% ./rustc foo.rs
error[E0277]: the trait bound `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` is not satisfied
--> foo.rs:13:9
|
13 | foo(1 + bar(x,
| ^ trait `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` not satisfied
|
```
show
```
% ./rustc foo.rs
error[E0277]: the trait bound `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` is not satisfied
--> foo.rs:13:9
|
13 | foo(1 + bar(x,
| ________^ starting here...
14 | | y),
| |_____________^ ...ending here: trait `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` not satisfied
|
```
This implements RFC 1624, tracking issue #37339.
- `FnCtxt` (in typeck) gets a stack of `LoopCtxt`s, which store the
currently deduced type of that loop, the desired type, and a list of
break expressions currently seen. `loop` loops get a fresh type
variable as their initial type (this logic is stolen from that for
arrays). `while` loops get `()`.
- `break {expr}` looks up the broken loop, and unifies the type of
`expr` with the type of the loop.
- `break` with no expr unifies the loop's type with `()`.
- When building MIR, `loop` loops no longer construct a `()` value at
termination of the loop; rather, the `break` expression assigns the
result of the loop. `while` loops are unchanged.
- `break` respects contexts in which expressions may not end with braced
blocks. That is, `while break { break-value } { while-body }` is
illegal; this preserves backwards compatibility.
- The RFC did not make it clear, but I chose to make `break ()` inside
of a `while` loop illegal, just in case we wanted to do anything with
that design space in the future.
This is my first time dealing with this part of rustc so I'm sure
there's plenty of problems to pick on here ^_^
Clean up `ast::Attribute`, `ast::CrateConfig`, and string interning
This PR
- removes `ast::Attribute_` (changing `Attribute` from `Spanned<Attribute_>` to a struct),
- moves a `MetaItem`'s name from the `MetaItemKind` variants to a field of `MetaItem`,
- avoids needlessly wrapping `ast::MetaItem` with `P`,
- moves string interning into `syntax::symbol` (`ast::Name` is a reexport of `symbol::Symbol` for now),
- replaces `InternedString` with `Symbol` in the AST, HIR, and various other places, and
- refactors `ast::CrateConfig` from a `Vec` to a `HashSet`.
r? @eddyb
Improvements to the #[should_panic] feature
Add more error checking for the `#[should_panic]` attribute, and print the expected panic string when it does not match.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29000
Eg:
```running 3 tests
test test2 ... ok
test test1 ... FAILED
: Panic did not include expected string 'foo'
test test3 ... FAILED
failures:
---- test1 stdout ----
thread 'test1' panicked at 'bar', test.rs:7
note: Run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace.
---- test3 stdout ----
thread 'test3' panicked at 'bar', test.rs:18
```
rustc: Implement #[link(cfg(..))] and crt-static
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1721] which adds a new target feature
to the compiler, `crt-static`, which can be used to select how the C runtime for
a target is linked. Most targets dynamically linke the C runtime by default with
the notable exception of some of the musl targets.
[RFC 1721]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1721-crt-static.md
This commit first adds the new target-feature, `crt-static`. If enabled, then
the `cfg(target_feature = "crt-static")` will be available. Targets like musl
will have this enabled by default. This feature can be controlled through the
standard target-feature interface, `-C target-feature=+crt-static` or
`-C target-feature=-crt-static`.
Next this adds an gated and unstable `#[link(cfg(..))]` feature to enable the
`crt-static` semantics we want with libc. The exact behavior of this attribute
is a little squishy, but it's intended to be a forever-unstable
implementation detail of the liblibc crate.
Specifically the `#[link(cfg(..))]` annotation means that the `#[link]`
directive is only active in a compilation unit if that `cfg` value is satisfied.
For example when compiling an rlib, these directives are just encoded and
ignored for dylibs, and all staticlibs are continued to be put into the rlib as
usual. When placing that rlib into a staticlib, executable, or dylib, however,
the `cfg` is evaluated *as if it were defined in the final artifact* and the
library is decided to be linked or not.
Essentially, what'll happen is:
* On MSVC with `-C target-feature=-crt-static`, the `msvcrt.lib` library will be
linked to.
* On MSVC with `-C target-feature=+crt-static`, the `libcmt.lib` library will be
linked to.
* On musl with `-C target-feature=-crt-static`, the object files in liblibc.rlib
are removed and `-lc` is passed instead.
* On musl with `-C target-feature=+crt-static`, the object files in liblibc.rlib
are used and `-lc` is not passed.
This commit does **not** include an update to the liblibc module to implement
these changes. I plan to do that just after the 1.14.0 beta release is cut to
ensure we get ample time to test this feature.
cc #37406
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1721] which adds a new target feature
to the compiler, `crt-static`, which can be used to select how the C runtime for
a target is linked. Most targets dynamically linke the C runtime by default with
the notable exception of some of the musl targets.
[RFC 1721]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1721-crt-static.md
This commit first adds the new target-feature, `crt-static`. If enabled, then
the `cfg(target_feature = "crt-static")` will be available. Targets like musl
will have this enabled by default. This feature can be controlled through the
standard target-feature interface, `-C target-feature=+crt-static` or
`-C target-feature=-crt-static`.
Next this adds an gated and unstable `#[link(cfg(..))]` feature to enable the
`crt-static` semantics we want with libc. The exact behavior of this attribute
is a little squishy, but it's intended to be a forever-unstable
implementation detail of the liblibc crate.
Specifically the `#[link(cfg(..))]` annotation means that the `#[link]`
directive is only active in a compilation unit if that `cfg` value is satisfied.
For example when compiling an rlib, these directives are just encoded and
ignored for dylibs, and all staticlibs are continued to be put into the rlib as
usual. When placing that rlib into a staticlib, executable, or dylib, however,
the `cfg` is evaluated *as if it were defined in the final artifact* and the
library is decided to be linked or not.
Essentially, what'll happen is:
* On MSVC with `-C target-feature=-crt-static`, the `msvcrt.lib` library will be
linked to.
* On MSVC with `-C target-feature=+crt-static`, the `libcmt.lib` library will be
linked to.
* On musl with `-C target-feature=-crt-static`, the object files in liblibc.rlib
are removed and `-lc` is passed instead.
* On musl with `-C target-feature=+crt-static`, the object files in liblibc.rlib
are used and `-lc` is not passed.
This commit does **not** include an update to the liblibc module to implement
these changes. I plan to do that just after the 1.14.0 beta release is cut to
ensure we get ample time to test this feature.
cc #37406
Fix syntax error in the compiler
Currently `rustc` accepts the following code: `fn f<'a>() where 'a {}`. This should be a syntax error, shouldn't it?
Not sure if my changes actually compile, waiting for the LLVM to build.
Macro parser performance improvements and refactoring
This PR locally increased performance of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37074 by ~6.6 minutes.
Follow up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/37569, but doesn't focus explicitly on expansion performance.
History is relatively clean, but I can/will do some more polishing if this is deemed mergeable. Partially posting this now so I can get Travis to run tests for me.
r? @jseyfried
Don't spin expanding stmt macros.
If we can't make progress when parsing a macro expansion as a statement then we should just bail.
This alleviates the symptoms shown in e.g. #37113 and #37234 but it doesn't fix the problem that parsing invalid enum bodies (and others) leaves the parser in a crappy state.
I'm not sold on this strategy (checking `tokens_consumed`), so if anyone has a better idea, I'm all ears!
macros 1.1: Allow proc_macro functions to declare attributes to be mark as used
This PR allows proc macro functions to declare attribute names that should be marked as used when attached to the deriving item. There are a few questions for this PR.
- Currently this uses a separate attribute named `#[proc_macro_attributes(..)]`, is this the best choice?
- In order to make this work, the `check_attribute` function had to be modified to not error on attributes marked as used. This is a pretty large change in semantics, is there a better way to do this?
- I've got a few clones where I don't know if I need them (like turning `item` into a `TokenStream`), can these be avoided?
- Is switching to `MultiItemDecorator` the right thing here?
Also fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37563.
Point to type argument span when used as trait
Given the following code:
``` rust
struct Foo<T: Clone>(T);
use std::ops::Add;
impl<T: Clone, Add> Add for Foo<T> {
type Output = usize;
fn add(self, rhs: Self) -> Self::Output {
unimplemented!();
}
}
```
present the following output:
``` nocode
error[E0404]: `Add` is not a trait
--> file3.rs:5:21
|
5 | impl<T: Clone, Add> Add for Okok<T> {
| --- ^^^ expected trait, found type parameter
| |
| type parameter defined here
```
Fixes#35987.
Given the following code:
```rust
struct Foo<T: Clone>(T);
use std::ops::Add;
impl<T: Clone, Add> Add for Foo<T> {
type Output = usize;
fn add(self, rhs: Self) -> Self::Output {
unimplemented!();
}
}
```
present the following output:
```nocode
error[E0404]: `Add` is not a trait
--> file3.rs:5:21
|
5 | impl<T: Clone, Add> Add for Okok<T> {
| --- ^^^ expected trait, found type parameter
| |
| type parameter defined here
```
Stabilize `..` in tuple (struct) patterns
I'd like to nominate `..` in tuple and tuple struct patterns for stabilization.
This feature is a relatively small extension to existing stable functionality and doesn't have known blockers.
The feature first appeared in Rust 1.10 6 months ago.
An example of use: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/36203
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/33627
r? @nikomatsakis
KNOWN_ATTRIBUTES should really be named BUILT_ATTRIBUTES,
while KNOWN_ATTRIBUTES should be used to mark attributes
as known, similar to USED_ATTRIBUTES.
rustc: Add knowledge of Windows subsystems.
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1665] which adds support for the
`#![windows_subsystem]` attribute. This attribute allows specifying either the
"windows" or "console" subsystems on Windows to the linker.
[RFC 1665]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1665-windows-subsystem.md
Previously all Rust executables were compiled as the "console" subsystem which
meant that if you wanted a graphical application it would erroneously pop up a
console whenever opened. When compiling an application, however, this is
undesired behavior and the "windows" subsystem is used instead to have control
over user interactions.
This attribute is validated, but ignored on all non-Windows platforms.
cc #37499
