Use `nuw` when calculating slice lengths from `Range`s
An `assume` would definitely not be worth it, but since the flag is almost free we might as well tell LLVM this, especially on `_unchecked` calls where there's no obvious way for it to deduce it.
(Today neither safe nor unsafe indexing gets it: <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/G1jYT548s>)
fix multiple issues when promoting type-test subject
Multiple interdependent fixes. See linked issues for a short description of each.
When Promoting a type-test `T: 'a` from within the closure back to its parent function, there are a couple pre-existing bugs and limitations. They were exposed by the recent changes to opaque types because the type-test subject (`T`) is no longer a simple ParamTy.
Commit 1:
Fixes#108635Fixes#107426
Commit 2:
Fixes#108639
Commit 3:
Fixes#107516
Do not ICE when failing to normalize in ConstProp.
There is no reason to delay a bug there, as we bubble up the failure as TooGeneric.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97728
Add regression tests for issue 70919
Desugaring DropAndReplace at MIR build (#107844) fixed#70919.
Add regressions tests, borrowed from #102078, to ensure we check for this in the future.
cc ``@Aaron1011``
const_eval: `implies_by` in `rustc_const_unstable`
Fixes#107605.
Extend support for `implies_by` (from `#[stable]` and `#[unstable]`) to `#[rustc_const_stable]` and `#[rustc_const_unstable]`.
cc ``@steffahn``
An `assume` would definitely not be worth it, but since the flag is almost free we might as well tell LLVM this, especially on `_unchecked` calls where there's no obvious way for it to deduce it.
(Today neither safe nor unsafe indexing gets it: <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/G1jYT548s>)
Desugaring DropAndReplace at MIR build (#107844) fixed issue
70919. Add regressions tests, borrowed from #102078, to ensure we
check for this in the future.
Co-authored-by: Aaron Hill <aa1ronham@gmail.com>
Desugaring of drop and replace at MIR build
This commit desugars the drop and replace deriving from an
assignment at MIR build, avoiding the construction of the
`DropAndReplace` terminator (which will be removed in a following PR).
In order to retain the same error messages for replaces a new
`DesugaringKind::Replace` variant is introduced.
The changes in the borrowck are also useful for future work in moving drop elaboration
before borrowck, as no `DropAndReplace` would be present there anymore.
Notes on test diffs:
* `tests/ui/borrowck/issue-58776-borrowck-scans-children`: the assignment deriving from the desugaring kills the borrow.
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-fn-size-uninit-locals.rs`, `tests/mir-opt/issue_41110.test.ElaborateDrops.after.mir`, `tests/mir-opt/issue_41888.main.ElaborateDrops.after.mir`: drop elaboration generates (or reads from) a useless drop flag due to an issue with the dataflow analysis. Will be fixed independently by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106430.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104488 for more context
Label opaque type for 'captures lifetime' error message
Providing more information may help make this somewhat opaque (lol) error message a bit clearer.
Fix another ICE in `point_at_expr_source_of_inferred_type`
Types coming from method probes must only be investigated *structurally*, since they often contain escaping infer variables from generalization and autoderef. We already have a hack in this PR that erases variables from types, so just use that.
Fixes#108664
The note attached to this error is pretty bad:
```
here the type of `primes` is inferred to be `[_]`
```
But that's unrelated to the PR.
---
Side-note: This is a pretty easy to trigger beta regression, so I've nominated it. Alternatively, I'm slightly inclined to remove this code altogether until it can be reformulated to be more accurate and less ICEy.
Deny capturing late-bound non-lifetime param in anon const
Introduce a new AnonConstBoundary so we can detect when we capture a late-bound non-lifetime param with `non_lifetime_binders` enabled.
In the future, we could technically do something like introduce an early-bound parameter on the anon const, and stick the late-bound param in its substs (kinda like how we turn late-bound lifetimes in opaques into early-bound ones). But for now, just deny it so we don't ICE.
Fixes#108191
This commit desugars the drop and replace deriving from an
assignment at MIR build, avoiding the construction of the
DropAndReplace terminator (which will be removed in a followign PR)
In order to retain the same error messages for replaces a new
DesugaringKind::Replace variant is introduced.
Feed queries on impl side for RPITITs when using lower_impl_trait_in_trait_to_assoc_ty
I've added a test for traits that were already working and what I think is probably the last bit of infrastructure work needed.
In following PRs I'm going to start adding things TDD style, tests and code that make it work.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Make `ExprKind` the first field in `thir::Expr`
This makes its `Debug` impl print it first which is useful, as it's the most important part when looking at an expr.
Explain compile-time vs run-time difference in env!() error message
This PR is clarifying error message of `env!()` based on this user question: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/environment-variable-out-dir-is-undefined/90067
It makes it clear that `env!()` is for env variables defined at compile-time. There's special-case help text for common Cargo build script variables.
I've also rearranged the code to avoid allocating error message on the happy path when the env var is defined.
Point error span at Some constructor argument when trait resolution fails
This is a follow up to #108254 and #106477 which extends error span refinement to handle a case which I mistakenly believed was handled in #106477. The goal is to refine the error span depicted below:
```rs
trait Fancy {}
impl <T> Fancy for Option<T> where T: Iterator {}
fn want_fancy<F>(f: F) where F: Fancy {}
fn example() {
want_fancy(Some(5));
// (BEFORE) ^^^^^^^ `{integer}` is not an iterator
// (AFTER) ^ `{integer}` is not an iterator
}
```
I had used a (slightly more complex) example as an illustrative example in #108254 , but hadn't actually turned it into a test, because I had (incorrectly) believed at the time it was covered by existing behavior. It turns out that `Some` is slightly "special" in that it resolves differently from the other `enum` constructors I had tried, and therefore this test was actually broken.
I've now updated the tests to include this example, and fixed the code to correctly resolve the `Some` constructor so that the span of the error is reduced.
