This changes the current rule that impls within `doc(hidden)` modules
aren't inlined, to only inlining impls where the implemented
trait and type are reachable in documentation.
Adjust example for error E0225
Adjust example for error E0225
It's using Copy as a trait object compatible trait, which is not
appropriate, change to use a more typical Read + Send + Sync example.
Also use whitespace around `+`.
This seems appropriate apropos issue #32963
List possible keys of the -L rustc option.
Since `rustc --help -v` does not describe it, only *rustc.1* man page, but there is no man for Windows.
r? @alexcrichton
cc @steveklabnik
std: Change String::truncate to panic less
The `Vec::truncate` method does not panic if the length argument is greater than
the vector's current length, but `String::truncate` will indeed panic. This
semantic difference can be a bit jarring (e.g. #32717), and after some
discussion the libs team concluded that although this can technically be a
breaking change it is almost undoubtedly not so in practice.
This commit changes the semantics of `String::truncate` to be a noop if
`new_len` is greater than the length of the current string.
Closes#32717
Get all (but one) of debuginfo tests to pass with MIR codegen.
I didn't get much feedback in #31005 so I went ahead and implemented something simple.
Closes#31005, as MIR debuginfo should work now for most usecases.
The `no-debug-attribute` test no longer assumes variables are in scope of `return`.
We might also want to revisit that in #32949, but the test is more reliable now either way.
In order to get one last function in the `associated-type` test pass, this PR also fixes#32790.
Implement `pub(restricted)` privacy (RFC 1422)
This implements `pub(restricted)` privacy from RFC 1422 (cc #32409) behind a feature gate.
`pub(restricted)` paths currently cannot use re-exported modules both for simplicity of implementation and for future compatibility with RFC 1560 (cf #31783).
r? @nikomatsakis
Clean out old documentation as well as the new test/tools directories. Should
prevent a problem that happened this morning where a PR bounced and then it left
docs with "broken links" so all future PRs bounced.
It's using Copy as a trait object compatible trait, which is not
appropriate, change to use a more typical Read + Send + Sync example.
Also use whitespace around `+`.
Once upon a time, along with START_BLOCK and END_BLOCK in the castle of important blocks also lived
a RESUME_BLOCK (or was it UNWIND_BLOCK? Either works, I don’t remember anymore). This trinity of
important blocks were required to always exist from the birth to death of the MIR-land they
belonged to.
Some time later, it was discovered that RESUME_BLOCK was just a lazy goon enjoying comfortable life
in the light of fame of the other two. Needless to say, once found out, the RESUME_BLOCK was
quickly slain and disposed of.
Now, the all-seeing eye of ours discovers that END_BLOCK is actually the more evil and better
disguised twin of the slain RESUME_BLOCK. Thus END_BLOCK gets slain and quickly disposed
of. Glory to the START_BLOCK, one and only lord of the important blocks’ castle!
---
Basically, all this does, is removing restriction for END_BLOCK to exist past the first invocation
of RemoveDeadBlocks pass. This way for functions whose CFG does not reach the `END_BLOCK` end up
not containing the block.
As far as the implementation goes, I’m not entirely satisfied with the `BasicBlock::end_block`, I
had hoped to make `new` a `const fn` and then just have a `const END_BLOCK` private to mir::build,
but it turns out that constant functions don’t yet support conditionals nor a way to assert.
Add initial version of codegen unit partitioning for incremental compilation.
The task of the partitioning module is to take the complete set of translation items of a crate and produce a set of codegen units from it, where a codegen unit is a named set of (translation-item, linkage) pairs. That is, this module decides which translation item appears in which codegen units with which linkage.
This version only handles the case of partitioning for incremental compilation, not the regular N-codegen units case. In the future the regular case should be handled too, maybe even doing a bit more analysis to intelligently figure out a good partitioning.
One thing that could be improved is the syntax of the codegen unit tests. Right now they still use the compile-fail error specification infrastructure, so everything has to be on one line. Would be nice to be able to format things in a more readable way.
