8795: Allow semantic tokens for strings to be disabled r=matklad a=djrenren
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/7111
Pretty straightforward change, but open to any suggestions if there's a more recommended testing strategy than what I went with.
Co-authored-by: John Renner <john@jrenner.net>
8674: fix for #8664: Emit folding ranges for multi-line where clauses r=matklad a=m5tfi
#8664
I added a test that assert folding multi-line where clauses while leaving single lined one. Please, let me know if the code needs further improvements.
Co-authored-by: m5tfi <72708423+m5tfi@users.noreply.github.com>
8354: Distinguishing between different operators in semantic highlighting r=matklad a=chetankhilosiya
Co-authored-by: Chetan Khilosiya <chetan.khilosiya@gmail.com>
8410: Use CompletionTextEdit::InsertAndReplace if supported by the client r=Veykril a=Veykril
Fixes#8404, Fixes#3130
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
7335: added region folding r=matklad a=LucianoBestia
Regions of code that you'd like to be folded can be wrapped with `// #region` and `// #endregion` line comments.
This is called "Region Folding". It is originally available for many languages in VSCode. But Rust-analyzer has its own folding function and this is missing.
With this Pull Request I am suggesting a simple solution.
The regions are a special kind of comments, so I added a bit of code in the comment folding function.
The regex to match are: `^\s*//\s*#?region\b` and `^\s*//\s*#?endregion\b`.
The number of space characters is not important. There is an optional # character. The line can end with a name of the region.
Example:
```rust
// 1. some normal comment
// region: test
// 2. some normal comment
calling_function(x,y);
// endregion: test
```
I added a test for this new functionality in `folding_ranges.rs`.
Please, take a look and comment.
I found that these exact regexes are already present in the file `language-configuration.json`, but I don't find a way to read this configuration. So my regex is hardcoded in the code.
7691: Suggest name in extract variable r=matklad a=cpud36
Generate better default name in extract variable assist as was mentioned in issue #1587
# Currently supported
(in order of declining precedence)
1. Expr is argument to a function; use corresponding parameter name
2. Expr is result of a function or method call; use this function/method's name
3. Use expr type name (if possible)
4. Fallback to `var_name` otherwise
# Showcase
# Questions
* Should we more aggressively strip known types? E.g. we already strip `&T -> T`; should we strip `Option<T> -> T`, `Result<T, E> -> T`, and others?
* Integers and floats use `var_name` by default. Should we introduce a name, like `i`, `f` etc?
* Can we return a list and suggest a name when renaming(like IntelliJ does)?
* Should we add counters to remove duplicate variables? E.g. `type`, `type1`, type2`, etc.
Co-authored-by: Luciano Bestia <LucianoBestia@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Luciano <31509965+LucianoBestia@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vladyslav Katasonov <cpud47@gmail.com>
7657: utf8 r=matklad a=matklad
- Prepare for utf-8 offsets
- reduce code duplication in tests
- Make utf8 default, implement utf16 in terms of it
- Make it easy to add additional context for offset conversion
- Implement utf8 offsets
closes#7453
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
