The current system with AstIds has two primaraly drawbacks:
* It is possible to manufacture IDs out of thin air.
For example, it's possible to create IDs for items which are not
considered in CrateDefMap due to cfg. Or it is possible to mixup
structs and unions, because they share ID space.
* Getting the ID of a parent requires a secondary index.
Instead, the plan is to pursue the more traditional approach, where
each items stores the id of the parent declaration. This makes
`FromSource` more awkward, but also more correct: now, to get from an
AST to HIR, we first do this recursively for the parent item, and the
just search the children of the parent for the matching def
Right now they are handled in `postfix_dot_expr`, but that doesn't allow it to
correctly handle precedence. Integrate it more tightly with the Pratt parser
instead.
Also includes a drive-by fix for parsing `match .. {}`.
Fixes#2242.
2149: Handle IfLet in convert_to_guarded_return. r=matklad a=krk
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/2124
I could not move the cursor position out of `let`:
`le<|>t` vs `let<|>`.
Also, please suggest extra test cases.
Co-authored-by: krk <keremkat@gmail.com>
Whitespace can have special meaning in markdown. For instance
ending a line with three spaces will render a new line.
Note that this behavior diverges from RLS.
Fixes#1997
1951: Lower the precedence of the `as` operator. r=matklad a=goffrie
Previously, the `as` operator was being parsed like a postfix expression, and
therefore being given the highest possible precedence. That caused it to bind
more tightly than prefix operators, which it should not. Instead, parse it
somewhat like a normal binary expression with some special-casing.
Fixes#1851.
Co-authored-by: Geoffry Song <goffrie@gmail.com>
1928: Support `#[cfg(..)]` r=matklad a=oxalica
This PR implement `#[cfg(..)]` conditional compilation. It read default cfg options from `rustc --print cfg` with also hard-coded `test` and `debug_assertion` enabled.
Front-end settings are **not** included in this PR.
There is also a known issue that inner control attributes are totally ignored. I think it is **not** a part of `cfg` and create a separated issue for it. #1949Fixes#1920
Related: #1073
Co-authored-by: uHOOCCOOHu <hooccooh1896@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: oxalica <oxalicc@pm.me>
Forbidding block expressions entirely is too strict; instead, we should only
forbid them in contexts where we are parsing an optional RHS (i.e. the RHS of a
range expression).
Previously, the `as` operator was being parsed like a postfix expression, and
therefore being given the highest possible precedence. That caused it to bind
more tightly than prefix operators, which it should not. Instead, parse it
somewhat like a normal binary expression with some special-casing.
