Update runtime guarantee for `select_nth_unstable`
#106933 changed the runtime guarantee for `select_nth_unstable` from O(n) to O(n log n), since the old guarantee wasn't actually met by the implementation at the time. Now with #107522, `select_nth_unstable` should be truly linear in runtime, so we can revert its runtime guarantee to O(n). Since #106933 was considered a bug fix, this will probably need an FCP because it counts as a new API guarantee.
r? `@Amanieu`
Stabilize String::leak
Stabilizes the following API:
```Rust
impl String {
pub fn leak(self) -> &'static mut str;
}
```
closes#102929
blocked by having an FCP for stabilization.
Implement `TryFrom<&OsStr>` for `&str`
Recently when trying to work with `&OsStr` I was surprised to find this `impl` missing.
Since the `to_str` method already existed the actual implementation is fairly non-controversial, except for maybe the choice of the error type. I chose an opaque error here instead of something like `std::str::Utf8Error`, since that would already make a number of assumption about the underlying implementation of `OsStr`.
As this is a trait implementation, it is insta-stable, if I'm not mistaken?
Either way this will need an FCP.
I chose "1.64.0" as the version, since this is unlikely to land before the beta cut-off.
`@rustbot` modify labels: +T-libs-api
API Change Proposal: rust-lang/rust#99031 (accepted)
Add support for targets without unwinding in `mir-opt`, and improve `--bless` for it
The main goal of this PR is to add support for targets without unwinding support in the `mir-opt` test suite, by adding the `EMIT_MIR_FOR_EACH_PANIC_STRATEGY` comment. Similarly to 32bit vs 64bit, when that comment is present, blessed output files will have the `.panic-unwind` or `.panic-abort` suffix, and the right one will be chosen depending on the target's panic strategy.
The `EMIT_MIR_FOR_EACH_PANIC_STRATEGY` comment replaced all the `ignore-wasm32` comments in the `mir-opt` test suite, as those comments were added due to `wasm32` being a target without unwinding support. The comment was also added on other tests that were only executed on x86 but were still panic strategy dependent.
The `mir-opt` suite was then blessed, which caused a ton of churn as most of the existing output files had to be renamed and (mostly) duplicated with the abort strategy.
---
After [asking on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/mir-opt.20tests.20and.20panic.3Dabort), the main concern about this change is it'd make blessing the `mir-opt` suite even harder, as you'd need to both bless it with an unwinding target and an aborting target. This exacerbated the current situation, where you'd need to bless it with a 32bit and a 64bit target already.
Because of that, this PR also makes significant enhancements to `--bless` for the `mir-opt` suite, where it will automatically bless the suite four times with different targets, while requiring minimal cross-compilation.
To handle the 32bit vs 64bit blessing, there is now an hardcoded list of target mapping between 32bit and 64bit. The goal of the list is to find a related target that will *probably* work without requiring additional cross-compilation toolchains on the system. If a mapping is found, bootstrap will bless the suite with both targets, otherwise just with the current target.
To handle the panic strategy blessing (abort vs unwind), I had to resort to what I call "synthetic targets". For each of the target we're blessing (so either the current one, or a 32bit and a 64bit depending on the previous paragraph), bootstrap will extract the JSON spec of the target and change it to include `"panic-strategy": "abort"`. It will then build the standard library with this synthetic target, and bless the `mir-opt` suite with it.
As a result of these changes, blessing the `mir-opt` suite will actually bless it two or four times with different targets, ensuring all possible variants are actually blessed.
---
This PR is best reviewed commit-by-commit.
r? `@jyn514`
cc `@saethlin` `@oli-obk`
Ignore `core`, `alloc` and `test` tests that require unwinding on `-C panic=abort`
Some of the tests for `core` and `alloc` require unwinding through their use of `catch_unwind`. These tests fail when testing using `-C panic=abort` (in my case through a target without unwinding support, and `-Z panic-abort-tests`), while they should be ignored as they don't indicate a failure.
This PR marks all of these tests with this attribute:
```rust
#[cfg_attr(not(panic = "unwind"), ignore = "test requires unwinding support")]
```
I'm not aware of a way to test this on rust-lang/rust's CI, as we don't test any target with `-C panic=abort`, but I tested this locally on a Ferrocene target and it does indeed make the test suite pass.
Make BinaryHeap parametric over Allocator
Tracking issue: #32838
Related: https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-allocators/issues/7
This parametrizes `BinaryHeap` with `A`, similarly to how other collections are parametrized.
A couple things I left out:
```
BinaryHeap::append
Currently requires both structures to have the same allocator type. Could
change, but depends on Vec::append, which has the same constraints.
impl<T: Ord> Default for BinaryHeap<T>
Not parametrized, because there's nowhere to conjure the allocator from.
impl<T: Ord> FromIterator<T> for BinaryHeap<T>
Not parametrized, because there's nowhere to conjure the allocator from.
impl<T: Ord, const N: usize> From<[T; N]> for BinaryHeap<T>
Not parametrized, because there's nowhere to conjure the allocator from.
unsafe impl<I> AsVecIntoIter for IntoIter<I>
AsVecIntoIter is not allocator aware, and I didn't dare change it without guidance. Is this something important?
```
I've seen very few tests for allocator_api in general, but I'd like to at least test this on some usage code in my projects before moving forward.
EDIT: Updated the list of impls and functions that are not affected by this. `BinaryHeap` no longer has a `SpecExtend` impl, and prior work made implementing `Extend` possible.
It might happen that a synthetic target name does not match one of the
hardcoded ones in std's build script, causing std to fail to build. This
commit changes the std build script avoid including the restricted-std
feature unconditionally when a synthetic target is being built.
Fix ntdll linkage issues on Windows UWP platforms
See discussion: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112265#issuecomment-1575479683
Static loading `ntdll` functions does not work for UWP programs, which will end up link errors complaining about missing symbols, or failure to pass the WACK tests. The breakage was introduced in #108262.
This PR basically reverts part of the changes in #108262 for UWP only, and fixes some lint suggestions.
Uplift `clippy::cmp_nan` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::cmp_nan` lint into rustc.
## `invalid_nan_comparisons`
~~(deny-by-default)~~ (warn-by-default)
The `invalid_nan_comparisons` lint checks comparison with `f32::NAN` or `f64::NAN` as one of the operand.
### Example
```rust,compile_fail
let a = 2.3f32;
if a == f32::NAN {}
```
### Explanation
NaN does not compare meaningfully to anything – not even itself – so those comparisons are always false.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting a clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
`@rustbot` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #112260 (Improve document of `unsafe_code` lint)
- #112429 ([rustdoc] List matching impls on type aliases)
- #112442 (Deduplicate identical region constraints in new solver)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Uplift `clippy::undropped_manually_drops` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::undropped_manually_drops` lint.
## `undropped_manually_drops`
(warn-by-default)
The `undropped_manually_drops` lint check for calls to `std::mem::drop` with a value of `std::mem::ManuallyDrop` which doesn't drop.
### Example
```rust
struct S;
drop(std::mem::ManuallyDrop::new(S));
```
### Explanation
`ManuallyDrop` does not drop it's inner value so calling `std::mem::drop` will not drop the inner value of the `ManuallyDrop` either.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting an clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
`@rustbot` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
-----
For Clippy:
changelog: Moves: Uplifted `clippy::undropped_manually_drops` into rustc
Avoid unwind across `extern "C"` in `thread_local::fast_local`
This is a minimal fix for #112285, in case we want a simple patch that can be easily to backported if that's desirable.
*(Note: I have another broader cleanup which I've mostly omitted from here to avoid clutter, except for the `Cell` change, which isn't needed to fix UB, but simplifies safety comments).*
The only tier-1 target that this occurs on in a way that seems likely to cause problems in practice linux-gnu, although I believe some folks care about that platform somewhat 😉. I'm unsure how big of an issue this is. I've seen stuff like this behave quite badly, but there's a number of reasons to think this might actually be "fine in practice".
I've hedged my bets and assumed we'll backport this at least to beta but my feeling is that there's not enough evidence this is a problem worth backporting further than that.
### More details
This issue seems to have existed since `thread_local!`'s `const` init functionality was added. It occurs if you have a `const`-initialized thread local for a type that `needs_drop`, the drop panics, and you're on a target with support for static thread locals. In this case, we will end up defining an `extern "C"` function in the user crate rather than in libstd, and because the user crate will not have `#![feature(c_unwind)]` enabled, their panic will not be caught by an auto-inserted abort guard.
In practice, the actual situation where problems are likely[^ub] is somewhat narrower.
On most targets with static thread locals, we manage the TLS dtor list by hand (for reentrancy reasons among others). In these cases, while the users code may panic, we're calling it inside our own `extern "C"` (or `extern "system"`) function, which seems to (at least in practice) catch the panic and convert it to an abort.
However, on a few targets, most notably linux-gnu with recent glibc (but also fuchsia and redox), a tls dtor registration mechanism exists which we can actually use directly, [`__cxa_thread_atexit_impl`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/library/std/src/sys/unix/thread_local_dtor.rs#L26-L36).
This is the case that seems most likely to be a cause for concern, as now we're passing a function to the system library and panicking out of it in a case where there are may not be Rust frames above it on the call stack (since it's running thread shutdown), and even if there were, it may not be prepared to handle such unwinding. If that's the case, it'd be bad.
Is it? Dunno. The fact that it's a `__cxa_*` function makes me think they probably have considered that the callback could throw but I have no evidence here and it doesn't seem to be written down anywhere, so it's just a guess. (I would not be surprised if someone comes into this thread to tell me how definitely-bad-news it is).
That said, as I said, all this is actually UB! If this isn't a "technically UB but fine in practice", but all bets are off if this is the kind of thing we are telling LLVM about.
[^ub]: This is UB so take that with a grain of salt -- I'm absolutely making assumptions about how the UB will behave "in practice" here, which is almost certainly a mistake.
Add `task::Waker::noop`
I have found myself reimplementing this function many times when I need a `Context` but don't have a runtime or `futures` to hand.
Prior art: [`futures::task::noop_waker`](https://docs.rs/futures/0.3/futures/task/fn.noop_waker.html) and [`futures::task::noop_waker_ref`](https://docs.rs/futures/0.3/futures/task/fn.noop_waker_ref.html)
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98286
Unresolved questions:
1. Should we also add `RawWaker::noop()`? (I don't think so, I can't think of a use case for it)
2. Should we also add `Context::noop()`? Depending on the future direction `Context` goes a "noop context" might not even make sense in future.
3. Should it be an associated constant instead? That would allow for `let cx = &mut Context::from_waker(&Waker::NOOP);` to work on one line which is pretty nice. I don't really know what the guideline is here.
r? rust-lang/libs-api `@rustbot` label +T-libs-api -T-libs
Improved std support for ps vita target
Fixed a couple of things in std support for ps vita via Vita SDK newlib oss implementation:
- Added missing hardware features to target spec
- Compile in thumb by default (newlib is also compiled in thumb)
- Fixed fs calls. Vita newlib has a not-very-posix dirent. Also vita does not expose inodes, it's stubbed as 0 in stat, and I'm stubbing it here for dirent (because vita newlibs's dirent doesn't even have that field)
- Enabled signal handlers for panic unwinding
- Dropped static link requirement from the platform support md. Also, rearranged sections to better stick with the template.
Remove ExtendElement, ExtendWith, extend_with
Related to #104624, broken up into two commits. The first removes wrapper trait ExtendWith and its only implementer struct ExtendElement. The second may have perf issues so may be reverted/removed if no alternate fix is found; it should be profiled.
r? `@scottmcm`
- Switch TypeId to 128 bits
- Hack around the fact that tracing-subscriber dislikes how TypeId is hashed
- Remove lowering of type_id128 from rustc_codegen_llvm
- Remove unnecessary `type_id128` intrinsic (just change return type of `type_id`)
- Only hash the lower 64 bits of the TypeId
- Reword comment
add `#[doc(alias="flatmap")]` to `Option::and_then`
I keep forgetting that rust calls this `and_then` and trying to search for `flatmap`. `and_then`'s docs even mention "Some languages call this operation flatmap", but it doesn't show up as a result in the search at `https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/?search=flatmap`
Option::map_or_else: Show an example of integrating with Result
Moving this from https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/59 where an API addition was rejected. But I think it's valuable to add this example to the documentation at least.
