I just started learning Rust and the absence of an explanation of the for-loop in the beginning really bugged me about the tutorial. Hence I simply added these lines, where I would have expected them. I know that there is something later on in the section on traits. However, this simple iteration scheme feels like something that you should be aware of right away.
The 'do' keyword was deprecated in 0.10 #11868 , and is keep as
reserved keyword #12157 .
So the tutorial part about it doesn't make sense.
The spawning explanation was move into '15.2 Closure compatibility'.
The 'do' keyword was deprecated in 0.10 #11868 , and is keep as
reserved keyword #12157 .
So the tutorial part about it doesn't make sense.
The spawning explanation was move into '15.2 Closure compatibility'.
Fixing misspelling.
Thanks for precisions.
Moved from 15.2 to 15.1.
Fixed typo, and apply pnkfelix advices.
It's too easy to forget the `rust` tag to have a code example tested, and it's
far more common to have testable code than untestable code.
This alters rustdoc to have only two directives, `ignore` and `should_fail`. The
`ignore` directive ignores the code block entirely, and the `should_fail`
directive has been fixed to only fail the test if the code execution fails, not
also compilation.
This, the Nth rewrite of channels, is not a rewrite of the core logic behind
channels, but rather their API usage. In the past, we had the distinction
between oneshot, stream, and shared channels, but the most recent rewrite
dropped oneshots in favor of streams and shared channels.
This distinction of stream vs shared has shown that it's not quite what we'd
like either, and this moves the `std::comm` module in the direction of "one
channel to rule them all". There now remains only one Chan and one Port.
This new channel is actually a hybrid oneshot/stream/shared channel under the
hood in order to optimize for the use cases in question. Additionally, this also
reduces the cognitive burden of having to choose between a Chan or a SharedChan
in an API.
My simple benchmarks show no reduction in efficiency over the existing channels
today, and a 3x improvement in the oneshot case. I sadly don't have a
pre-last-rewrite compiler to test out the old old oneshots, but I would imagine
that the performance is comparable, but slightly slower (due to atomic reference
counting).
This commit also brings the bonus bugfix to channels that the pending queue of
messages are all dropped when a Port disappears rather then when both the Port
and the Chan disappear.
These are ancient. I removed a bunch of questions that are less relevant - or completely unrelevant, updated other entries, and removed things that are already better expressed elsewhere.
- Convert the formatting traits to `&self` rather than `_: &Self`
- Rejig `syntax::ext::{format,deriving}` a little in preparation
- Implement `#[deriving(Show)]`
Part of #8784
Changes:
- Everything labeled under collections in libextra has been moved into a new crate 'libcollection'.
- Renamed container.rs to deque.rs, since it was no longer 'container traits for extra', just a deque trait.
- Crates that depend on the collections have been updated and dependencies sorted.
- I think I changed all the imports in the tests to make sure it works. I'm not entirely sure, as near the end of the tests there was yet another `use` that I forgot to change, and when I went to try again, it started rebuilding everything, which I don't currently have time for.
There will probably be incompatibility between this and the other pull requests that are splitting up libextra. I'm happy to rebase once those have been merged.
The tests I didn't get to run should pass. But I can redo them another time if they don't.
