* Bugfix: Now slash/start comments aren't duplicated on trait parameters.
* Removing unnecesary comment.
* Improvements: Improving the BytePos offset.
* Improvements: Improving the description of the test cases.
fn_args_layout is now deprecated.
This option was renamed to better communicate that it affects the layout
of parameters in function signatures and not the layout of arguments in
function calls.
Because the `fn_args_layout` is a stable option the renamed option is
also stable, however users who set `fn_args_layout` will get a warning
message letting them know that the option has been renamed.
Fixes 5395
In PR 5239 we switched from using `structopt` to `clap`. It seems that
the default behavior for `clap` is to override the `--version` flag,
which prevented our custom version display code from running.
The fix as outlined in https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/issues/3405 was
to set `#[clap(global_setting(AppSettings::NoAutoVersion))]` to prevent
clap from setting its own default behavior for the `--version` flag.
Fixes 5399
Memoizing expressions lead to cases where rustfmt's stability guarantees
were violated.
This reverts commit a37d3ab0e1c7c05f1a6410fb7ddf5539f0d030f8.
Support lint expectations for `--force-warn` lints (RFC 2383)
Rustc has a `--force-warn` flag, which overrides lint level attributes and forces the diagnostics to always be warn. This means, that for lint expectations, the diagnostic can't be suppressed as usual. This also means that the expectation would not be fulfilled, even if a lint had been triggered in the expected scope.
This PR now also tracks the expectation ID in the `ForceWarn` level. I've also made some minor adjustments, to possibly catch more bugs and make the whole implementation more robust.
This will probably conflict with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97718. That PR should ideally be reviewed and merged first. The conflict itself will be trivial to fix.
---
r? `@wesleywiser`
cc: `@flip1995` since you've helped with the initial review and also discussed this topic with me. 🙃
Follow-up of: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87835
Issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85549
Yeah, and that's it.
When useing `version=One` rustfmt will treat the leading `r#` as part of
the `UseSegment` used for sorting. When using `version=Two` rustfmt will
ignore the leading `r#` and only consider the name of the identifier
when sorting the `UseSegment`.
There are some proposed import sorting changes for raw identifier `r#`.
These changes constitute a breaking change, and need to be version
gagted. Before version gating those changes we add the version
information to the `UseSegment`.
Remove hacks in `make_token_stream`.
`make_tokenstream` has three commented hacks, and a comment at the top
referring to #67062. These hacks have no observable effect, at least as judged
by running the test suite. The hacks were added in #82608, with an explanation
[here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82608#issuecomment-812877329). It
appears that one of the following is true: (a) they never did anything useful,
(b) they do something useful but we have no test coverage for them, or (c)
something has changed in the meantime that means they are no longer necessary.
This commit removes the hacks and the comments, in the hope that (b) is not
true.
r? `@Aaron1011`
Create (unstable) 2024 edition
[On Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Deprecating.20macro.20scoping.20shenanigans/near/272860652), there was a small aside regarding creating the 2024 edition now as opposed to later. There was a reasonable amount of support and no stated opposition.
This change creates the 2024 edition in the compiler and creates a prelude for the 2024 edition. There is no current difference between the 2021 and 2024 editions. Cargo and other tools will need to be updated separately, as it's not in the same repository. This change permits the vast majority of work towards the next edition to proceed _now_ instead of waiting until 2024.
For sanity purposes, I've merged the "hello" UI tests into a single file with multiple revisions. Otherwise we'd end up with a file per edition, despite them being essentially identical.
````@rustbot```` label +T-lang +S-waiting-on-review
Not sure on the relevant team, to be honest.
Loading the fallback bundle in compilation sessions that won't go on to
emit any errors unnecessarily degrades compile time performance, so
lazily create the Fluent bundle when it is first required.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
