This was recommended by GitHub Support to try reducing the things that
could've caused #78743. I checked the changelog and there should be no
practical impact for us (we already set an explicit fetch-depth).
Provide diagnostic suggestion in ExprUseVisitor Delegate
The [Delegate trait](981346fc07/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/expr_use_visitor.rs (L28-L38)) currently use `PlaceWithHirId` which is composed of Hir `Place` and the
corresponding expression id.
Even though this is an accurate way of expressing how a Place is used,
it can cause confusion during diagnostics.
Eg:
```
let arr : [String; 5];
let [a, ...] = arr;
^^^ E1 ^^^ = ^^E2^^
```
Here `arr` is moved because of the binding created E1. However, when we
point to E1 in diagnostics with the message `arr` was moved, it can be
confusing. Rather we would like to report E2 to the user.
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/20
r? `@ghost`
Provide diagnostic suggestion in ExprUseVisitor Delegate
The [Delegate trait](981346fc07/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/expr_use_visitor.rs (L28-L38)) currently use `PlaceWithHirId` which is composed of Hir `Place` and the
corresponding expression id.
Even though this is an accurate way of expressing how a Place is used,
it can cause confusion during diagnostics.
Eg:
```
let arr : [String; 5];
let [a, ...] = arr;
^^^ E1 ^^^ = ^^E2^^
```
Here `arr` is moved because of the binding created E1. However, when we
point to E1 in diagnostics with the message `arr` was moved, it can be
confusing. Rather we would like to report E2 to the user.
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/20
r? `@ghost`
Add lint for 'field_reassign_with_default` #568
changelog: Add lint for field_reassign_with_default that checks if mutable object + field modification is used to edit a binding initialized with Default::default() instead of struct constructor.
Fixes#568
Notes:
- Checks for reassignment of one or more fields of a binding initialized with Default::default().
- Implemented using EarlyLintPass, might be future proofed better with LateLintPass.
- Does not trigger if Default::default() is used via another type implementing Default.
- This is a re-open of [PR#4761](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/4761), but I couldn't figure out how to re-open that one so here's a new one with the requested changes :S
While technically the i686-unknown-freebsd target has been a tier 2
development platform for a long time, with full toolchain tarballs
available on static.rust-lang.org, due to a bug in the manifest
generation the target was never available for download through rustup.
The infrastructure team privately inquired the FreeBSD package
maintainers, and they weren't relying on those tarballs either, so it's
a fair assumption to say practically nobody is using those tarballs.
This PR then removes the CI builder that produces full tarballs for the
target, and moves the compilation of rust-std for the target in
dist-various-2.
The x86_64-unknown-freebsd target is *not* affected.
Refactorings in preparation for const value trees
cc #72396
This PR changes the `Scalar::Bits { data: u128, size: u8 }` variant to `Scalar::Bits(ScalarInt)` where `ScalarInt` contains the same information, but is `repr(packed)`. The reason for using a packed struct is to allow enum variant packing to keep the original size of `Scalar` instead of adding another word to its size due to padding.
Other than that the PR just gets rid of all the inspection of the internal fields of `Scalar::Bits` which were frankly scary. These fields have invariants that we need to uphold and we can't do that without making the fields private.
r? `@ghost`
Use reparsed `TokenStream` if we captured any inner attributes
Fixes#78675
We now bail out of `prepend_attrs` if we ended up capturing any inner
attributes (which can happen in several places, due to token capturing
for `macro_rules!` arguments.
