inliner: Use substs_for_mir_body
Changes from 68965 extended the kind of instances that are being
inlined. For some of those, the `instance_mir` returns a MIR body that
is already expressed in terms of the types found in substitution array,
and doesn't need further substitution.
Use `substs_for_mir_body` to take that into account.
Resolves#78529.
Resolves#78560.
Fix handling of item names for HIR
- Handle variants, fields, macros in `Node::ident()`
- Handle the crate root in `opt_item_name`
- Rewrite `item_name` in terms of `opt_item_name`
I need this for both https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77820 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78082, so splitting it out into a separate PR so it can land early.
Refactor IntErrorKind to avoid "underflow" terminology
This PR is a continuation of #76455
# Changes
- `Overflow` renamed to `PosOverflow` and `Underflow` renamed to `NegOverflow` after discussion in #76455
- Changed some of the parsing code to return `InvalidDigit` rather than `Empty` for strings "+" and "-". https://users.rust-lang.org/t/misleading-error-in-str-parse-for-int-types/49178
- Carry the problem `char` with the `InvalidDigit` variant.
- Necessary changes were made to the compiler as it depends on `int_error_matching`.
- Redid tests to match on specific errors.
r? ```@KodrAus```
- Handle variants, fields, macros in `Node::ident()`
- Handle the crate root in `opt_item_name`
- Factor out `item_name_from_def_id` to reduce duplication
- Look at HIR before the DefId for `opt_item_name`
This gives accurate spans, which are not available from serialized
metadata.
- Don't panic on the crate root in `opt_item_name`
- Add comments
Working expression optimization, and some improvements to branch-level source coverage
This replaces PR #78040 after reorganizing the original commits (by request) into a more logical sequence of major changes.
Most of the work is in the MIR `transform/coverage/` directory (originally, `transform/instrument_coverage.rs`).
Note this PR includes some significant additional debugging capabilities, to help myself and any future developer working on coverage improvements or issues.
In particular, there's a new Graphviz (.dot file) output for the coverage graph (the `BasicCoverageBlock` control flow graph) that provides ways to get some very good insight into the relationships between the MIR, the coverage graph BCBs, coverage spans, and counters. (There are also some cool debugging options, available via environment variable, to alter how some data in the graph appears.)
And the code for this Graphviz view is actually generic... it can be used by any implementation of the Rust `Graph` traits.
Finally (for now), I also now output information from `llvm-cov` that shows the actual counters and spans it found in the coverage map, and their counts (from the `--debug` flag). I found this to be enormously helpful in debugging some coverage issues, so I kept it in the test results as well for additional context.
`@tmandry` `@wesleywiser`
r? `@tmandry`
Here's an example of the new coverage graph:
* Within each `BasicCoverageBlock` (BCB), you can see each `CoverageSpan` and its contributing statements (MIR `Statement`s and/or `Terminator`s)
* Each `CoverageSpan` has a `Counter` or and `Expression`, and `Expression`s show their Add/Subtract operation with nested operations. (This can be changed to show the Counter and Expression IDs instead, or in addition to, the BCB.)
* The terminators of all MIR `BasicBlock`s in the BCB, including one final `Terminator`
* If an "edge counter" is required (because we need to count an edge between blocks, in some cases) the edge's Counter or Expression is shown next to its label. (Not shown in the example below.) (FYI, Edge Counters are converted into a new MIR `BasicBlock` with `Goto`)
<img width="1116" alt="Screen Shot 2020-10-17 at 12 23 29 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3827298/96331095-616cb480-100f-11eb-8212-60f2d433e2d8.png">
r? `@tmandry`
FYI: `@wesleywiser`
Changes from 68965 extended the kind of instances that are being
inlined. For some of those, the `instance_mir` returns a MIR body that
is already expressed in terms of the types found in substitution array,
and doesn't need further substitution.
Use `substs_for_mir_body` to take that into account.
Properly handle lint spans after MIR inlining
The first commit shows what happens when we apply mir inlining and then cause lints on the inlined MIR.
The second commit fixes that.
r? `@wesleywiser`
foreign_modules query hash table lookups
When compiling a large monolithic crate we're seeing huge times in the `foreign_modules` query due to repeated iteration over foreign modules (in order to find a module by its id). This implements hash table lookups so that which massively reduces time spent in that query in this particular case. We'll need to see if the overhead of creating the hash table has a negative impact on performance in more normal compilation scenarios.
I'm working with `@wesleywiser` on this.
Fixes#78660
With PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75534 merged, we now run
more lint-related code for future-incompat-report, even when their final
level is Allow. Some lint-related code was not expecting `Level::Allow`,
and had an explicit panic.
This PR explicitly tracks the lint level set on the command line before
`--cap-lints` is applied. This is used to emit a more precise error
note (e.g. we don't say that `-W lint-name` was specified on the
command line just because a lint was capped to Warn). As a result, we
can now correctly emit a note that `-A` was used if we got
`Level::Allow` from the command line (before the cap is applied).
Implement rustc side of report-future-incompat
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71249
This is an alternative to `@pnkfelix's` initial implementation in https://github.com/pnkfelix/rust/commits/prototype-rustc-side-of-report-future-incompat (mainly because I started working before seeing that branch 😄 ).
My approach outputs the entire original `Diagnostic`, in a way that is compatible with incremental compilation. This is not yet integrated with compiletest, but can be used manually by passing `-Z emit-future-incompat-report` to `rustc`.
Several changes are made to support this feature:
* The `librustc_session/lint` module is moved to a new crate `librustc_lint_defs` (name bikesheddable). This allows accessing lint definitions from `librustc_errors`.
* The `Lint` struct is extended with an `Option<FutureBreakage>`. When present, it indicates that we should display a lint in the future-compat report. `FutureBreakage` contains additional information that we may want to display in the report (currently, a `date` field indicating when the crate will stop compiling).
* A new variant `rustc_error::Level::Allow` is added. This is used when constructing a diagnostic for a future-breakage lint that is marked as allowed (via `#[allow]` or `--cap-lints`). This allows us to capture any future-breakage diagnostics in one place, while still discarding them before they are passed to the `Emitter`.
* `DiagnosticId::Lint` is extended with a `has_future_breakage` field, indicating whether or not the `Lint` has future breakage information (and should therefore show up in the report).
* `Session` is given access to the `LintStore` via a new `SessionLintStore` trait (since `librustc_session` cannot directly reference `LintStore` without a cyclic dependency). We use this to turn a string `DiagnosticId::Lint` back into a `Lint`, to retrieve the `FutureBreakage` data.
Currently, `FutureBreakage.date` is always set to `None`. However, this could potentially be interpreted by Cargo in the future.
I've enabled the future-breakage report for the `ARRAY_INTO_ITER` lint, which can be used to test out this PR. The intent is to use the field to allow Cargo to determine the date of future breakage (as described in [RFC 2834](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2834-cargo-report-future-incompat.md)) without needing to parse the diagnostic itself.
cc `@pnkfelix`
