Right now the --crate-id and related flags are all process *after* the entire
crate is parsed. This is less than desirable when used with makefiles because it
means that just to learn the output name of the crate you have to parse the
entire crate (unnecessary).
This commit changes the behavior to lift the handling of these flags much sooner
in the compilation process. This allows us to not have to parse the entire crate
and only have to worry about parsing the crate attributes themselves. The
related methods have all been updated to take an array of attributes rather than
a crate.
Additionally, this ceases duplication of the "what output are we producing"
logic in order to correctly handle things in the case of --test.
Finally, this adds tests for all of this functionality to ensure that it does
not regress.
Now that the metadata is an owned value with a lifetime of a borrowed byte
slice, it's possible to have future optimizations where the metadata doesn't
need to be copied around (very expensive operation).
Now that the metadata is an owned value with a lifetime of a borrowed byte
slice, it's possible to have future optimizations where the metadata doesn't
need to be copied around (very expensive operation).
For `str.as_mut_buf`, un-closure-ification is achieved by outright removal (see commit message). The others are replaced by `.as_ptr`, `.as_mut_ptr` and `.len`
As the title says. The trans changes will lead to an auxiliary alloca being created that allows debug info to track the `self` argument. This alloca is only created in debug builds however. Otherwise very little had to be done after I managed to navigate to some degree the jungle that is self-argument handling `:P`
Closes#10549
When a borrow occurs twice illegally, Rust will label the other borrow
as the "second borrow". This is quite confusing, as the "second borrow"
usually happened before the flagged barrow (e.g. as far as dataflow
is concerned, the first borrow is OK, the second borrow is illegal.)
This patch renames "second borrow" to "previous borrow", to make the
spatial relationship between the two borrows clearer.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@cs.stanford.edu>
This code in resolve accidentally forced all types with an impl to become
public. This fixes it by default inheriting the privacy of what was previously
there and then becoming `true` if nothing else exits.
Closes#10545
This code in resolve accidentally forced all types with an impl to become
public. This fixes it by default inheriting the privacy of what was previously
there and then becoming `true` if nothing else exits.
Closes#10545
When a borrow occurs twice illegally, Rust will label the other borrow
as the "second borrow". This is quite confusing, as the "second borrow"
usually happened before the flagged borrow (e.g. as far as dataflow
is concerned, the first borrow is OK, the second borrow is illegal.)
This patch renames "second borrow" to "previous borrow", to make the
spatial relationship between the two borrows clearer.
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@cs.stanford.edu>
If it's a trait method, this checks the stability attribute of the
method inside the trait definition. Otherwise, it checks the method
implementation itself.
Close#8961.
If it's a trait method, this checks the stability attribute of the
method inside the trait definition. Otherwise, it checks the method
implementation itself.
This PR improves the stepping experience in GDB. It contains some fine tuning of line information and makes *rustc* produce nearly the same IR/DWARF as Clang. The focus of the changes is function prologue handling which has caused some problems in the past (https://github.com/mozilla/rust/issues/9641).
It seems that GDB does not properly handle function prologues when the function uses segmented stacks, i.e. it does not recognize that the `__morestack` check is part of the prologue. When setting a breakpoint like `break foo` it will set the break point before the arguments of `foo()` have been loaded and still contain bogus values. For function with the #[no_split_stack] attribute this problem has never occurred for me so I'm pretty sure that segmented stacks are the cause of the problem. @jdm mentioned that segmented stack won't be completely abandoned after all. I'd be grateful if you could tell me about what the future might bring in this regard (@brson, @cmr).
Anyway, this PR should alleviate this problem at least in the case when setting breakpoints using line numbers and also make it less confusing when setting them via function names because then GDB will break *before* the first statement where one could conceivably argue that arguments need not be initialized yet.
Also, a koala: 🐨
Cheers,
Michael
