offset_of: don't require type to be `Sized`
Fixes#112051
~~The RFC [explicitly forbids](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3308-offset_of.html#limitations) non-`Sized` types, but it looks like only the fields being recursed into were checked. The sized check also seemed to have been completely missing for tuples~~
change `BorrowKind::Unique` to be a mutating `PlaceContext`
fixes#112056
I believe that `BorrowKind::Unique` is a footgun in general, so I added a FIXME and opened https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112072. This is a bit too involved for this PR though.
refactor and cleanup the leak check, add it to new solver
ended up being a bit more involved than I wanted but is hopefully still easy enough to review as a single PR, can split it into separate ones otherwise.
this can be reviewed commit by commit:
a473d55cdb9284aa2b01282d1b529a2a4d26547b 31a686646534ca006d906ec757ece4e771d6f973 949039c107852a5e36361c08b62821a0613656f5 242917bf5170d9a723c6c8e23e9d9d0c2fa8dc9d ed2b25a7aa28be3184be9e3022c2796a30eaad87 are all pretty straightforward.
03dd83b4c3f4ff27558f5c8ab859bd9f83db1d04 makes it easier to refactor coherence in a later commit, see the commit description, cc `@oli-obk`
4fe311d807a77b6270f384e41689bf5d58f46aec I don't quite remember what we wanted to test here, this definitely doesn't test that the occurs check doesn't cause incorrect errors in coherence, also cc `@oli-obk` here. I may end up writing a new test for this myself later.
5c200d88a91b75bd0875b973150655bd581ef97a is the main refactor of the leak check, changing it to take the `outer_universe` instead of getting it from a snapshot. Using a snapshot requires us to be in a probe which we aren't in the new solver, it also just feels dirty as snapshots don't really have anything to do with universes.
with all of this cfc230d54188d9c7ed867a9a0d1f51be77b485f9 is now kind of trivial.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Don't typecheck recovered method call from suggestion
Only make the use-dot-operator-to-call-method suggestion, but do not double down and use the recovered type to perform method call typechecking as it will produce confusing diagnostics relevant for the *fixed* code.
### Code Sample
```rust
struct Client;
impl Client {
fn post<T: std::ops::Add>(&self, _: T, _: T) {}
}
fn f() {
let c = Client;
post(c, ());
}
```
### Before This PR
```
error[[E0277]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/error_codes/E0277.html): cannot add `()` to `()`
--> src/lib.rs:9:5
|
9 | post(c, ());
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ no implementation for `() + ()`
|
= help: the trait `Add` is not implemented for `()`
note: required by a bound in `Client::post`
--> src/lib.rs:4:16
|
4 | fn post<T: std::ops::Add>(&self, _: T, _: T) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Client::post`
error[[E0061]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/error_codes/E0061.html): this function takes 2 arguments but 1 argument was supplied
--> src/lib.rs:9:5
|
9 | post(c, ());
| ^^^^ an argument of type `()` is missing
|
note: method defined here
--> src/lib.rs:4:8
|
4 | fn post<T: std::ops::Add>(&self, _: T, _: T) {}
| ^^^^ ----- ---- ----
help: provide the argument
|
9 | post((), ())(c, ());
| ++++++++
error[[E0425]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/error_codes/E0425.html): cannot find function `post` in this scope
--> src/lib.rs:9:5
|
9 | post(c, ());
| ^^^^ not found in this scope
|
help: use the `.` operator to call the method `post` on `&Client`
|
9 - post(c, ());
9 + c.post(());
|
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0061, E0277, E0425.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0061`.
```
### After This PR
```
error[E0425]: cannot find function `post` in this scope
--> tests/ui/typeck/issue-106929.rs:9:5
|
9 | post(c, ());
| ^^^^ not found in this scope
|
help: use the `.` operator to call the method `post` on `&Client`
|
9 - post(c, ());
9 + c.post(());
|
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0425`.
```
Fixes#106929.
fix: dedup `static_candidates` before report
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103646
`record_static_candidate` had been executed twice, resulting in the presence of two identical `CandidateSource::Trait(Cat)` in static_candidates. This PR aims to deduplication the `static_candidates` list, allowing it to execute `suggest_associated_call_syntax` properly.
Uplift `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` lint into two lints.
## `invalid_from_utf8_unchecked`
(deny-by-default)
The `invalid_from_utf8_unchecked` lint checks for calls to `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked` and `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut` with an invalid UTF-8 literal.
### Example
```rust
unsafe {
std::str::from_utf8_unchecked(b"cl\x82ippy");
}
```
### Explanation
Creating such a `str` would result in undefined behavior as per documentation for `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked` and `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut`.
## `invalid_from_utf8`
(warn-by-default)
The `invalid_from_utf8` lint checks for calls to `std::str::from_utf8` and `std::str::from_utf8_mut` with an invalid UTF-8 literal.
### Example
```rust
std::str::from_utf8(b"ru\x82st");
```
### Explanation
Trying to create such a `str` would always return an error as per documentation for `std::str::from_utf8` and `std::str::from_utf8_mut`.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting a clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
````@rustbot```` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
-----
For Clippy:
changelog: Moves: Uplifted `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` into rustc
we can otherwise assign a hidden type to the opaque which
causes ICE if we don't use `take_opaque_types` during
coherence. This is annoying so I didn't bother. Added a test
showing the behavior this prevents.
Optimize scalar and scalar pair representations loaded from ByRef in llvm
in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105653 I noticed that we were generating suboptimal LLVM IR if we had a `ConstValue::ByRef` that could be represented by a `ScalarPair`. Before https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105653 this is probably rare, but after it, every slice will go down this suboptimal code path that requires LLVM to untangle a bunch of indirections and translate static allocations that are only used once to read a scalar pair from.
Only make the use-dot-operator-to-call-method suggestion, but do not
double down and use the recovered type to perform method call
typechecking as it will produce confusing diagnostics on the "fixed"
code.
`[T; N]::zip` is "eager" but most zips are mapped.
This causes poor optimization in generated code.
This is a fundamental design issue and "zip" is
"prime real estate" in terms of function names,
so let's free it up again.
Make `TrustedStep` require `Copy`
All the implementations of the trait already are `Copy`, and this seems to be enough to simplify the implementations enough to make the MIR inliner willing to inline basics like `Range::next`.
r? `@thomcc`
All the implementations of the trait already are `Copy`, and this seems to be enough to simplify the implementations enough to make the MIR inliner willing to inline basics like `Range::next`.
Add a test for issue 110457/incremental ICE with closures with the same span
Closes#110457
It's probably possible to minimize the test case more, considering that we now know the underlying reason for the ICE, but I didn't.
r? `@cjgillot`
Make `TyKind: Debug` have less verbose output
Current `TyKind: Debug` impl is basically unusable for debugging, its too verbose even for verbose debugging 🤣 This PR replaces the debug logic for `TyKind` with a more manual debug impl instead of a hand expanded derived impl. This should help make #107084 more reasonable to land since the output of `Ty: Debug` will be better.
This isn't a fully completed change to the `Debug` impl of `TyKind` as there's still logic from the derive macro for some variants. Some of the variants are also not consisten with the `-Zverbose` printing of `Ty`, ideally `-Zverbose` printing of `Ty` would also just defer to the debug impl instead of having lots of checks in pretty printing. I plan on fixing this in follow up PRs since it seems tricky to do in this one and its already a large PR 😅
Use `Cow` in `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage`.
Each of `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}` has a comment:
```
// FIXME(davidtwco): can a `Cow<'static, str>` be used here?
```
This commit answers that question in the affirmative. It's not the most compelling change ever, but it might be worth merging.
This requires changing the `impl<'a> From<&'a str>` impls to `impl From<&'static str>`, which involves a bunch of knock-on changes that require/result in call sites being a little more precise about exactly what kind of string they use to create errors, and not just `&str`. This will result in fewer unnecessary allocations, though this will not have any notable perf effects given that these are error paths.
Note that I was lazy within Clippy, using `to_string` in a few places to preserve the existing string imprecision. I could have used `impl Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>` in various places as is done in the compiler, but that would have required changes to *many* call sites (mostly changing `&format("...")` to `format!("...")`) which didn't seem worthwhile.
r? `@WaffleLapkin`
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #112029 (Recover upon mistyped error on typo'd `const` in const param def)
- #112037 (Add details about `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` to E0133)
- #112039 (compiler: update solaris/illumos to enable tsan support.)
- #112042 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format)
- #112045 (Followup to #111973)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Recover upon mistyped error on typo'd `const` in const param def
And add machine-applicable fix for the typo'd `const` keyword.
### Before
```
error: expected one of `,`, `:`, `=`, or `>`, found `N`
--> src/lib.rs:1:18
|
1 | pub fn bar<Const N: u8>() {}
| ^ expected one of `,`, `:`, `=`, or `>`
```
### After This PR
```
error: `const` keyword was mistyped as `Const`
--> test.rs:1:8
|
1 | fn bar<Const N: u8>() {}
| ^^^^^
|
help: use the `const` keyword
|
1 | fn bar<const N: u8>() {}
| ~~~~~
```
Fixes#111941.
Inline derived `hash`
Because most of the other derived functions are inlined: `clone`, `default`, `eq`, `partial_cmp`, `cmp`. The exception is `fmt`, but it tends to not be on hot paths as much.
r? `@ghost`
Each of `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}` has a comment:
```
// FIXME(davidtwco): can a `Cow<'static, str>` be used here?
```
This commit answers that question in the affirmative. It's not the most
compelling change ever, but it might be worth merging.
This requires changing the `impl<'a> From<&'a str>` impls to `impl
From<&'static str>`, which involves a bunch of knock-on changes that
require/result in call sites being a little more precise about exactly
what kind of string they use to create errors, and not just `&str`. This
will result in fewer unnecessary allocations, though this will not have
any notable perf effects given that these are error paths.
Note that I was lazy within Clippy, using `to_string` in a few places to
preserve the existing string imprecision. I could have used `impl
Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>` in various places as is done in the
compiler, but that would have required changes to *many* call sites
(mostly changing `&format("...")` to `format!("...")`) which didn't seem
worthwhile.
MIR: opt-in normalization of `BasicBlock` and `Local` numbering
This doesn't matter at all for actual codegen, but after spending some time reading pre-codegen MIR, I was wishing I didn't have to jump around so much in reading post-inlining code.
So this add two passes that are off by default for every mir level, but can be enabled (`-Zmir-enable-passes=+ReorderBasicBlocks,+ReorderLocals`) for humans.
Don't check for misaligned raw pointer derefs inside Rvalue::AddressOf
From https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112026#issuecomment-1565686697:
rustc 1.70 (stable next week) added a Mir pass to add pointer alignment checks in debug mode. Adding these checks caused some crates to break, but that was expected, since they contain broken code (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111487) for tracking that.
However, the checks added are slightly more aggressive than they should have been. Specifically, they also check the place in an `addr_of!` expression. Whether lack of alignment there is or isn't UB is unclear. This PR modifies the pass to not affect those cases.
I spot checked the crater regressions and the ones I saw were not the case that this PR is modifying. It still seems good to not land anything overaggressive though
Enable MatchBranchSimplification
This pass is one of the small number of benefits from `-Zmir-opt-level=3` that has motivated rustc_codegen_cranelift to use it:
19ed0aade6/compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift/build_system/build_sysroot.rs (L244-L246)
Cranelift's motivation for this is _runtime_ performance improvements in debug builds. Lifting this pass all the way to `-Zmir-opt-level=1` seems to come without significant perf overhead, so that's what I'm suggesting here.
Add support for LLVM SafeStack
Adds support for LLVM [SafeStack] which provides backward edge control
flow protection by separating the stack into two parts: data which is
only accessed in provable safe ways is allocated on the normal stack
(the "safe stack") and all other data is placed in a separate allocation
(the "unsafe stack").
SafeStack support is enabled by passing `-Zsanitizer=safestack`.
[SafeStack]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/SafeStack.html
cc `@rcvalle` #39699
Add warn-by-default lint when local binding shadows exported glob re-export item
This PR introduces a warn-by-default rustc lint for when a local binding (a use statement, or a type declaration) produces a name which shadows an exported glob re-export item, causing the name from the exported glob re-export to be hidden (see #111336).
### Unresolved Questions
- [x] ~~Is this approach correct? While it passes the UI tests, I'm not entirely convinced it is correct.~~ Seems to be ok now.
- [x] ~~What should the lint be called / how should it be worded? I don't like calling `use x::*;` or `struct Foo;` a "local binding" but they are `NameBinding`s internally if I'm not mistaken.~~ ~~The lint is called `local_binding_shadows_glob_reexport` for now, unless a better name is suggested.~~ `hidden_glob_reexports`.
Fixes#111336.
