The errors are either:
- The meta-variable used in the right-hand side is not bound (or defined) in the
left-hand side.
- The meta-variable used in the right-hand side does not repeat with the same
kleene operator as its binder in the left-hand side. Either it does not repeat
enough, or it uses a different operator somewhere.
This change should have no semantic impact.
This updates the `Extend` implementations to use `for_each` for many
collections: `BinaryHeap`, `BTreeMap`, `BTreeSet`, `LinkedList`, `Path`,
`TokenStream`, `VecDeque`, and `Wtf8Buf`.
Folding with `for_each` enables better performance than a `for`-loop for
some iterators, especially if they can just forward to internal
iterators, like `Chain` and `FlatMap` do.
Introduce proc_macro::Span::source_text
A function to extract the actual source behind a Span.
Background: I would like to use `syn` in a `build.rs` script to parse the rust code, and extract part of the source code. However, `syn` only gives access to proc_macro2::Span, and i would like to get the source code behind that.
I opened an issue on proc_macro2 bug tracker for this feature https://github.com/alexcrichton/proc-macro2/issues/110 and @alexcrichton said the feature should first go upstream in proc_macro. So there it is!
Since most of the Span API is unstable anyway, this is guarded by the same `proc_macro_span` feature as everything else.
Cosmetic improvements to doc comments
This has been factored out from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/58036 to only include changes to documentation comments (throughout the rustc codebase).
r? @steveklabnik
Once you're happy with this, maybe we could get it through with r=1, so it doesn't constantly get invalidated? (I'm not sure this will be an issue, but just in case...) Anyway, thanks for your advice so far!
Before this addition, every delimited group like (...) [...] {...} has
only a single Span that covers the full source location from opening
delimiter to closing delimiter. This makes it impossible for a
procedural macro to trigger an error pointing to just the opening or
closing delimiter. The Rust compiler does not seem to have the same
limitation:
mod m {
type T =
}
error: expected type, found `}`
--> src/main.rs:3:1
|
3 | }
| ^
On that same input, a procedural macro would be forced to trigger the
error on the last token inside the block, on the entire block, or on the
next token after the block, none of which is really what you want for an
error like above.
This commit adds group.span_open() and group.span_close() which access
the Span associated with just the opening delimiter and just the closing
delimiter of the group. Relevant to Syn as we implement real error
messages for when parsing fails in a procedural macro.
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #52946 (Documented impl From on line 367 of libserialize/json.rs)
- #53234 (Remove Travis shutdown debug scripts, and remove CI-specific DNS settings)
- #53313 (Two small improvements)
- #53360 (Addressed #51602)
- #53364 (Warn if the user tries to use GATs)
- #53373 (Tweak unclosed delimiter parser error)
- #53377 (std: Use target_pointer_width for BACKTRACE_ELF_SIZE)
- #53395 (Use #[non_exhaustive] on internal enums)
- #53399 (Tidy: ignore non-Markdown files when linting for the Unstable Book)
- #53412 (syntax_ext: remove leftover span_err_if_not_stage0 macro.)
TokenStream::extend
Two new insta-stable impls in libproc_macro:
```rust
impl Extend<TokenTree> for TokenStream
impl Extend<TokenStream> for TokenStream
```
`proc_macro::TokenStream` already implements `FromIterator<TokenTree>` and `FromIterator<TokenStream>` so I elected to support the same input types for `Extend`.
**This commit reduces compile time of Serde derives by 60% (takes less than half as long to compile)** as measured by building our test suite:
```console
$ git clone https://github.com/serde-rs/serde
$ cd serde/test_suite
$ cargo check --tests --features proc-macro2/nightly
$ rm -f ../target/debug/deps/libtest_*.rmeta
$ time cargo check --tests --features proc-macro2/nightly
Before: 20.8 seconds
After: 8.6 seconds
```
r? @alexcrichton
