New lint: manual-range-contains
This fixes#1110, at least for the contains-suggesting part.
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
changelog: new lint: manual-range-contains
Add lint for `&mut Mutex::lock`
Fixes#1765
changelog: Add lint [`mut_mutex_lock`] for `&mut Mutex::lock` and suggests using `&mut Mutex::get_mut` instead.
Add new lint for undropped ManuallyDrop values
Adds a new lint for the following code:
```rust
struct S;
impl Drop for S {
fn drop(&mut self) {
println!("drip drop");
}
}
fn main() {
// This will not drop the `S`!!!
drop(std::mem::ManuallyDrop::new(S));
unsafe {
// This will.
std::mem::ManuallyDrop::drop(&mut std::mem::ManuallyDrop::new(S));
}
}
```
The inner value of a `ManuallyDrop` will not be dropped unless the proper, unsafe drop function is called on it. This lint makes sure that a user does not accidently use the wrong function and forget to drop a `ManuallyDrop` value.
Fixes#5581.
---
*Please keep the line below*
changelog: none
Add lint for holding RefCell Ref across an await
Fixes#6008
This introduces the lint await_holding_refcell_ref. For async functions, we iterate
over all types in generator_interior_types and look for `core::cell::Ref` or `core::cell::RefMut`. If we find one then we emit a lint.
Heavily cribs from: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/5439
changelog: introduce the await_holding_refcell_ref lint
Refactor trivially_copy_pass_by_ref and the new lint into pass_by_ref_or_value module
Update stderr of conf_unknown_key test
Rename lint to large_types_passed_by_value
Increase `pass_by_value_size_limit` default value to 256
Improve rules for `large_types_passed_by_value`
Improve tests for `large_types_passed_by_value`
Improve documentation for `large_types_passed_by_value`
Make minor corrections to pass_by_ref_or_value.rs suggested by clippy itself
Fix `large_types_passed_by_value` example and improve docs
pass_by_ref_or_value: Tweak check for mut annotation in params
large_types_passed_by_value: add tests for pub trait, trait impl and inline attributes
New lint: Recommend using `ptr::eq` when possible
This is based almost entirely on the code available in the previous PR #4596. I merely updated the code to make it compile.
Fixes#3661.
- [ ] I'm not sure about the lint name, but it was the one used in the original PR.
- [X] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- [X] `cargo test` passes locally
- [X] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- [X] Added lint documentation
- [X] Run `cargo dev fmt`
---
changelog: none
Downgrade string_lit_as_bytes to nursery
Between #1402 (regarding `to_owned`) and #4494 (regarding `impl Read`), as well as other confusion I've seen hit in my work codebase involving string_lit_as_bytes (`"...".as_bytes().into()`), I don't think this lint is at a quality to be enabled by default.
I would consider re-enabling this lint after it is updated to understand when the surrounding type information is sufficient to unsize `b"..."` to &\[u8\] without causing a type error.
As currently implemented, this lint is pushing people to write `&b"_"[..]` which is not an improvement over `"_".as_bytes()` as far as I am concerned.
---
changelog: Remove string_lit_as_bytes from default set of enabled lints
Downgrade rc_buffer to restriction
I think Arc\<Vec\<T\>\> and Arc\<String\> and similar are a totally reasonable data structure, as observed by others in the comments on [#6044](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/6044#event-3799579830) as well. Doing `Arc::make_mut(&mut self.vec).push(...)` or `Arc::make_mut(&mut self.string).push_str("...")` is a terrific and well performing copy-on-write pattern. Linting this with an enabled-by-default <kbd>performance</kbd> lint strikes me as an unacceptable false positive balance.
As of #6090 the documentation of this lint now contains:
> **Known problems:** This pattern can be desirable ...
which should indicate that we shouldn't be linting against correct, reasonable, well-performing patterns with an enabled-by-default lint.
Mentioning #6044, #6090.
r? `@yaahc,` who reviewed the lint.
---
changelog: Remove rc_buffer from default set of enabled lints
Lint for invisible Unicode characters other than ZWSP
This PR extends the existing `zero_width_space` lint to look for other invisible characters as well (in this case, `\\u{ad}` soft hyphen.
I feel like this lint is the logical place to add the check, but I also realize the lint name is not particularly flexible, but I also understand that it shouldn't be renamed for compatibility reasons.
Open questions:
- What other characters should trigger the lint?
- What should be done with the lint name?
- How to indicate the change in functionality?
Motivation behind this PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/77417 - I managed to shoot myself in the foot by an invisible character pasted into my test case.
changelog: rename [`zero_width_space`] to [`invisible_characters`] and add SHY and WJ to the list.
Add `rc_buffer` lint for checking Rc<String> and friends
Fixes#2623
This is a bit different from the original PR attempting to implement this type of lint. Rather than linting against converting into the unwanted types, this PR lints against declaring the unwanted type in a struct or function definition.
I'm reasonably happy with what I have here, although I used the fully qualified type names for the Path and OsString suggestions, and I'm not sure if I should have just used the short versions instead, even if they might not have been declared via use.
Also, I don't know if "buffer type" is the best way to put it or not. Alternatively I could call it a "growable type" or "growable buffer type", but I was thinking of PathBuf when I started making the lint.
changelog: Add `rc_buffer` lint
