Fix transmute::<T, U> where T requires a bigger alignment than U
For transmute::<T, U> we simply pointercast the destination from a U
pointer to a T pointer, without providing any alignment information,
thus LLVM assumes that the destination is aligned to hold a value of
type T, which is not necessarily true. This can lead to LLVM emitting
machine instructions that assume said alignment, and thus cause aborts.
To fix this, we need to provide the actual alignment to store_operand()
and in turn to store() so they can set the proper alignment information
on the stores and LLVM can emit the proper machine instructions.
Fixes#32947
Fix debuginfo for unsized struct members
The member was given the size of a fat pointer, which caused
llvm to emit DWARF attributes for a 128-bit bitfield.
For transmute::<T, U> we simply pointercast the destination from a U
pointer to a T pointer, without providing any alignment information,
thus LLVM assumes that the destination is aligned to hold a value of
type T, which is not necessarily true. This can lead to LLVM emitting
machine instructions that assume said alignment, and thus cause aborts.
To fix this, we need to provide the actual alignment to store_operand()
and in turn to store() so they can set the proper alignment information
on the stores and LLVM can emit the proper machine instructions.
Fixes#32947
Since discriminants do not support i128 yet, lets just calculate the boundaries within the 64 bits
that are supported. This also avoids an issue with bootstrapping on 32 bit systems due to #38727.
llvm::LLVMConstIntGetZExtValue doesn't accept values with more than 64 bits.
This fixes an LLVM assertion error when compiling libcore with stage1:
src/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1336:
uint64_t llvm::APInt::getZExtValue() const:
Assertion `getActiveBits() <= 64 && "Too many bits for uint64_t"' failed.
Fixes rebase fallout, makes code correct in presence of 128-bit constants.
This commit includes manual merge conflict resolution changes from a rebase by @est31.
This commit introduces 128-bit integers. Stage 2 builds and produces a working compiler which
understands and supports 128-bit integers throughout.
The general strategy used is to have rustc_i128 module which provides aliases for iu128, equal to
iu64 in stage9 and iu128 later. Since nowhere in rustc we rely on large numbers being supported,
this strategy is good enough to get past the first bootstrap stages to end up with a fully working
128-bit capable compiler.
In order for this strategy to work, number of locations had to be changed to use associated
max_value/min_value instead of MAX/MIN constants as well as the min_value (or was it max_value?)
had to be changed to use xor instead of shift so both 64-bit and 128-bit based consteval works
(former not necessarily producing the right results in stage1).
This commit includes manual merge conflict resolution changes from a rebase by @est31.
PTX support, take 2
- You can generate PTX using `--emit=asm` and the right (custom) target. Which
then you can run on a NVIDIA GPU.
- You can compile `core` to PTX. [Xargo] also works and it can compile some
other crates like `collections` (but I doubt all of those make sense on a GPU)
[Xargo]: https://github.com/japaric/xargo
- You can create "global" functions, which can be "called" by the host, using
the `"ptx-kernel"` ABI, e.g. `extern "ptx-kernel" fn kernel() { .. }`. Every
other function is a "device" function and can only be called by the GPU.
- Intrinsics like `__syncthreads()` and `blockIdx.x` are available as
`"platform-intrinsics"`. These intrinsics are *not* in the `core` crate but
any Rust user can create "bindings" to them using an `extern
"platform-intrinsics"` block. See example at the end.
- Trying to emit PTX with `-g` (debuginfo); you get an LLVM error. But I don't
think PTX can contain debuginfo anyway so `-g` should be ignored and a warning
should be printed ("`-g` doesn't work with this target" or something).
- "Single source" support. You *can't* write a single source file that contains
both host and device code. I think that should be possible to implement that
outside the compiler using compiler plugins / build scripts.
- The equivalent to CUDA `__shared__` which it's used to declare memory that's
shared between the threads of the same block. This could be implemented using
attributes: `#[shared] static mut SCRATCH_MEMORY: [f32; 64]` but hasn't been
implemented yet.
- Built-in targets. This PR doesn't add targets to the compiler just yet but one
can create custom targets to be able to emit PTX code (see the example at the
end). The idea is to have people experiment with this feature before
committing to it (built-in targets are "insta-stable")
- All functions must be "inlined". IOW, the `.rlib` must always contain the LLVM
bitcode of all the functions of the crate it was produced from. Otherwise, you
end with "undefined references" in the final PTX code but you won't get *any*
linker error because no linker is involved. IOW, you'll hit a runtime error
when loading the PTX into the GPU. The workaround is to use `#[inline]` on
non-generic functions and to never use `#[inline(never)]` but this may not
always be possible because e.g. you could be relying on third party code.
- Should `--emit=asm` generate a `.ptx` file instead of a `.s` file?
TL;DR Use Xargo to turn a crate into a PTX module (a `.s` file). Then pass that
PTX module, as a string, to the GPU and run it.
The full code is in [this repository]. This section gives an overview of how to
run Rust code on a NVIDIA GPU.
[this repository]: https://github.com/japaric/cuda
- Create a custom target. Here's the 64-bit NVPTX target (NOTE: the comments
are not valid because this is supposed to be a JSON file; remove them before
you use this file):
``` js
// nvptx64-nvidia-cuda.json
{
"arch": "nvptx64", // matches LLVM
"cpu": "sm_20", // "oldest" compute capability supported by LLVM
"data-layout": "e-i64:64-v16:16-v32:32-n16:32:64",
"llvm-target": "nvptx64-nvidia-cuda",
"max-atomic-width": 0, // LLVM errors with any other value :-(
"os": "cuda", // matches LLVM
"panic-strategy": "abort",
"target-endian": "little",
"target-pointer-width": "64",
"target-vendor": "nvidia", // matches LLVM -- not required
}
```
(There's a 32-bit target specification in the linked repository)
- Write a kernel
``` rust
extern "platform-intrinsic" {
fn nvptx_block_dim_x() -> i32;
fn nvptx_block_idx_x() -> i32;
fn nvptx_thread_idx_x() -> i32;
}
/// Copies an array of `n` floating point numbers from `src` to `dst`
pub unsafe extern "ptx-kernel" fn memcpy(dst: *mut f32,
src: *const f32,
n: usize) {
let i = (nvptx_block_dim_x() as isize)
.wrapping_mul(nvptx_block_idx_x() as isize)
.wrapping_add(nvptx_thread_idx_x() as isize);
if (i as usize) < n {
*dst.offset(i) = *src.offset(i);
}
}
```
- Emit PTX code
```
$ xargo rustc --target nvptx64-nvidia-cuda --release -- --emit=asm
Compiling core v0.0.0 (file://..)
(..)
Compiling nvptx-builtins v0.1.0 (https://github.com/japaric/nvptx-builtins)
Compiling kernel v0.1.0
$ cat target/nvptx64-nvidia-cuda/release/deps/kernel-*.s
//
// Generated by LLVM NVPTX Back-End
//
.version 3.2
.target sm_20
.address_size 64
// .globl memcpy
.visible .entry memcpy(
.param .u64 memcpy_param_0,
.param .u64 memcpy_param_1,
.param .u64 memcpy_param_2
)
{
.reg .pred %p<2>;
.reg .s32 %r<5>;
.reg .s64 %rd<12>;
ld.param.u64 %rd7, [memcpy_param_2];
mov.u32 %r1, %ntid.x;
mov.u32 %r2, %ctaid.x;
mul.wide.s32 %rd8, %r2, %r1;
mov.u32 %r3, %tid.x;
cvt.s64.s32 %rd9, %r3;
add.s64 %rd10, %rd9, %rd8;
setp.ge.u64 %p1, %rd10, %rd7;
@%p1 bra LBB0_2;
ld.param.u64 %rd3, [memcpy_param_0];
ld.param.u64 %rd4, [memcpy_param_1];
cvta.to.global.u64 %rd5, %rd4;
cvta.to.global.u64 %rd6, %rd3;
shl.b64 %rd11, %rd10, 2;
add.s64 %rd1, %rd6, %rd11;
add.s64 %rd2, %rd5, %rd11;
ld.global.u32 %r4, [%rd2];
st.global.u32 [%rd1], %r4;
LBB0_2:
ret;
}
```
- Run it on the GPU
``` rust
// `kernel.ptx` is the `*.s` file we got in the previous step
const KERNEL: &'static str = include_str!("kernel.ptx");
driver::initialize()?;
let device = Device(0)?;
let ctx = device.create_context()?;
let module = ctx.load_module(KERNEL)?;
let kernel = module.function("memcpy")?;
let h_a: Vec<f32> = /* create some random data */;
let h_b = vec![0.; N];
let d_a = driver::allocate(bytes)?;
let d_b = driver::allocate(bytes)?;
// Copy from host to GPU
driver::copy(h_a, d_a)?;
// Run `memcpy` on the GPU
kernel.launch(d_b, d_a, N)?;
// Copy from GPU to host
driver::copy(d_b, h_b)?;
// Verify
assert_eq!(h_a, h_b);
// `d_a`, `d_b`, `h_a`, `h_b` are dropped/freed here
```
---
cc @alexcrichton @brson @rkruppe
> What has changed since #34195?
- `core` now can be compiled into PTX. Which makes it very easy to turn `no_std`
crates into "kernels" with the help of Xargo.
- There's now a way, the `"ptx-kernel"` ABI, to generate "global" functions. The
old PR required a manual step (it was hack) to "convert" "device" functions
into "global" functions. (Only "global" functions can be launched by the host)
- Everything is unstable. There are not "insta stable" built-in targets this
time (\*). The users have to use a custom target to experiment with this
feature. Also, PTX instrinsics, like `__syncthreads` and `blockIdx.x`, are now
implemented as `"platform-intrinsics"` so they no longer live in the `core`
crate.
(\*) I'd actually like to have in-tree targets because that makes this target
more discoverable, removes the need to lug around .json files, etc.
However, bundling a target with the compiler immediately puts it in the path
towards stabilization. Which gives us just two cycles to find and fix any
problem with the target specification. Afterwards, it becomes hard to tweak
the specification because that could be a breaking change.
A possible solution could be "unstable built-in targets". Basically, to use an
unstable target, you'll have to also pass `-Z unstable-options` to the compiler.
And unstable targets, being unstable, wouldn't be available on stable.
> Why should this be merged?
- To let people experiment with the feature out of tree. Having easy access to
the feature (in every nightly) allows this. I also think that, as it is, it
should be possible to start prototyping type-safe single source support using
build scripts, macros and/or plugins.
- It's a straightforward implementation. No different that adding support for
any other architecture.
propagate TIME_DEPTH to the helper threads for -Z time-passes
Currently, the timing measurements for LLVM passes and the like don't come out indented, which messes up `perf.rust-lang.org`.
r? @nrc
Remove special case for Box<ZST> in trans
Remove extra lang item, `exchange_free`; use `box_free` instead.
Trans used to insert code equivalent to `box_free` in a wrapper around
`exchange_free`, and that code is now removed from trans.
Fixes#37710.
- `--emit=asm --target=nvptx64-nvidia-cuda` can be used to turn a crate
into a PTX module (a `.s` file).
- intrinsics like `__syncthreads` and `blockIdx.x` are exposed as
`"platform-intrinsics"`.
- "cabi" has been implemented for the nvptx and nvptx64 architectures.
i.e. `extern "C"` works.
- a new ABI, `"ptx-kernel"`. That can be used to generate "global"
functions. Example: `extern "ptx-kernel" fn kernel() { .. }`. All
other functions are "device" functions.
initial SPARC support
### UPDATE
Can now compile `no_std` executables with:
```
$ cargo new --bin app && cd $_
$ edit Cargo.toml && tail -n2 $_
[dependencies]
core = { path = "/path/to/rust/src/libcore" }
$ edit src/main.rs && cat $_
#![feature(lang_items)]
#![no_std]
#![no_main]
#[no_mangle]
pub fn _start() -> ! {
loop {}
}
#[lang = "panic_fmt"]
fn panic_fmt() -> ! {
loop {}
}
$ edit sparc-none-elf.json && cat $_
{
"arch": "sparc",
"data-layout": "E-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-f128:64-n32-S64",
"executables": true,
"llvm-target": "sparc",
"os": "none",
"panic-strategy": "abort",
"target-endian": "big",
"target-pointer-width": "32"
}
$ cargo rustc --target sparc-none-elf -- -C linker=sparc-unknown-elf-gcc -C link-args=-nostartfiles
$ file target/sparc-none-elf/debug/app
app: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, SPARC, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, not stripped
$ sparc-unknown-elf-readelf -h target/sparc-none-elf/debug/app
ELF Header:
Magic: 7f 45 4c 46 01 02 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Class: ELF32
Data: 2's complement, big endian
Version: 1 (current)
OS/ABI: UNIX - System V
ABI Version: 0
Type: EXEC (Executable file)
Machine: Sparc
Version: 0x1
Entry point address: 0x10074
Start of program headers: 52 (bytes into file)
Start of section headers: 1188 (bytes into file)
Flags: 0x0
Size of this header: 52 (bytes)
Size of program headers: 32 (bytes)
Number of program headers: 2
Size of section headers: 40 (bytes)
Number of section headers: 14
Section header string table index: 11
$ sparc-unknown-elf-objdump -Cd target/sparc-none-elf/debug/app
target/sparc-none-elf/debug/app: file format elf32-sparc
Disassembly of section .text:
00010074 <_start>:
10074: 9d e3 bf 98 save %sp, -104, %sp
10078: 10 80 00 02 b 10080 <_start+0xc>
1007c: 01 00 00 00 nop
10080: 10 80 00 02 b 10088 <_start+0x14>
10084: 01 00 00 00 nop
10088: 10 80 00 00 b 10088 <_start+0x14>
1008c: 01 00 00 00 nop
```
---
Someone wants to attempt launching some Rust [into space](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/5h76oa/c_interop/) but their platform is based on the SPARCv8 architecture. Let's not block them by enabling LLVM's SPARC backend.
Something very important that they'll also need is the "cabi" stuff as they'll be embedding some Rust code into a bigger C application (i.e. heavy use of `extern "C"`). The question there is what name(s) should we use for "target_arch" as the "cabi" implementation [varies according to that parameter](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.13.0/src/librustc_trans/abi.rs#L498-L523).
AFAICT, SPARCv8 is a 32-bit architecture and SPARCv9 is a 64-bit architecture. And, LLVM uses `sparc`, `sparcv9` and `sparcel` for [the architecture triple](ac1c94226e/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h (L67-L69)) so perhaps we should use `target_arch = "sparc"` (32-bit) and `target_arch = "sparcv9"` (64-bit) as well.
r? @alexcrichton This PR only enables this LLVM backend when rustbuild is used. Do I also need to implement this for the old Makefile-based build system? Or are all our nightlies now being generated using rustbuild?
cc @brson
