sugg: suggest the usage of boolean value when there is a typo in the keyword
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100686
This adds a new suggestion when there is a well-known typo
With the following program
```rust
fn main() {
let x = True;
}
```
Now we have the following suggestion
```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `True` in this scope
--> test.rs:2:13
|
2 | let x = True;
| ^^^^ not found in this scope
|
help: you may want to use a bool value instead
|
2 | let x = true;
| ~~~~
error: aborting due to previous error
```
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Use `&mut Diagnostic` instead of `&mut DiagnosticBuilder` unless needed
This seems to be the established convention (02ff9e0) when `DiagnosticBuilder` was first added. I am guilty of introducing some of these.
Don't ICE while suggesting updating item path.
When an item isn't found, we may suggest an appropriate import to `use`. Along with that, we also suggest updating the path to work with the `use`. Unfortunately, if the code in question originates from a macro, the span used to indicate which part of the path needs updating may not be suitable and cause an ICE (*). Since, such code is not adjustable directly by the user without modifying the macro, just skip the suggestion in such cases.
(*) The ICE happens because the emitter want to indicate to the user what code to delete by referencing a certain span. But in this case, said span has `lo == hi == 0` which means it thinks it's a dummy span. Adding a space before the proc macro attribute is enough to stop it from ICE'ing but even then the suggestion doesn't really make any sense:
```
help: if you import `DataStore`, refer to it directly
|
1 - #[dbstruct::dbstruct]
1 + #[dbstruct::dbstruct]
```
Since suggestions are best-effort, I just gated this one on `can_be_used_for_suggestions` which catches cases like this.
Fixes#100199
When an item isn't found, we may suggest an appropriate import to
`use`. Along with that, we also suggest updating the path to work
with the `use`. Unfortunately, if the code in question originates
from a macro, the span used to indicate which part of the path
needs updating may not be suitable and cause an ICE. Since, such
code is not adjustable directly by the user without modifying the
macro, just skip the suggestion in such cases.
Always create elided lifetimes, even if inferred.
`PathSource` gives the context in which a path is encountered. The same `PathSource` is used for the full path and the `QSelf` part.
Therefore, we can only rely on `PathSource` to know whether typechecking will be able to infer the lifetimes, not whether we need to insert them at all.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99949
Resolve function lifetime elision on the AST
~Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97720~
Lifetime elision for functions is purely syntactic in nature, so can be resolved on the AST.
This PR replicates the elision logic and diagnostics on the AST, and replaces HIR-based resolution by a `delay_span_bug`.
This refactor allows for more consistent diagnostics, which don't have to guess the original code from HIR.
r? `@petrochenkov`
rmeta: avoid embedding `StabilityLevel::Unstable` reason multiple times into .rmeta\.rlib files
Avoids bloating size of some rmeta\rlib files by not placing default string for `StabilityLevel::Unstable` reason multiple times, affects only stdlib\rustc artifacts. For stdlib cuts about 3% (diff of total size for patched\unpatched *.rmeta files of stage1-std) of file size, depending on crates.
fixes#88180
