minor fix for #93231
In #93231 I introduced the new sidebar colours to make the contrast more balanced and easier to read, but it seems I made a copy-paste error in the light theme, resulting in functions appearing green.
This one line change replaces that colour with it's corrected orange/brown colour.
I have double checked the rest of the colours and they seem ok. Sorry for the inconvenience
Remove deduplication of early lints
We already have a general mechanism for deduplicating reported
lints, so there's no need to have an additional one for early lints
specifically. This allows us to remove some `PartialEq` impls.
Store a `Symbol` instead of an `Ident` in `AssocItem`
This is the same idea as #92533, but for `AssocItem` instead
of `VariantDef`/`FieldDef`.
With this change, we no longer have any uses of
`#[stable_hasher(project(...))]`
Store a `Symbol` instead of an `Ident` in `AssocItem`
This is the same idea as #92533, but for `AssocItem` instead
of `VariantDef`/`FieldDef`.
With this change, we no longer have any uses of
`#[stable_hasher(project(...))]`
Rustdoc: remove ListAttributesIter and use impl Iterator instead
This is a continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92227.
I found that `ListAttributesIter` did not optimize well and replacing it with a simple `impl Iterator` resulted in 1-3 % instruction count wins locally.
Because I needed to use `impl Iterator` on a slice of AST attributes, I had to implement it using GAT + impl trait. I also have a version without GAT [here](5470e2a65c), if GATs are not welcome in rustdoc :D Locally it resulted in equal performance numbers.
Can I ask for a perf. run? Thanks.
r? rust-lang/rustdoc
Remove ordering traits from `OutlivesConstraint`
In two cases where this ordering was used, I've replaced the sorting to use a key that does not rely on `DefId` being `Ord`. This is part of #90317. If I understand correctly, whether this is correct depends on whether the `RegionVid`s are tracked during incremental compilation. But I might be mistaken in this approach. cc `@cjgillot`
Use error-on-mismatch policy for PAuth module flags.
This agrees with Clang, and avoids an error when using LTO with mixed
C/Rust. LLVM considers different behaviour flags to be a mismatch,
even when the flag value itself is the same.
This also makes the flag setting explicit for all uses of
LLVMRustAddModuleFlag.
----
I believe that this fixes#92885, but have only reproduced it locally on Linux hosts so cannot confirm that it fixes the issue as reported.
I have not included a test for this because it is covered by an existing test (`src/test/run-make-fulldeps/cross-lang-lto-clang`). It is not without its problems, though:
* The test requires Clang and `--run-clang-based-tests-with=...` to run, and this is not the case on the CI.
* Any test I add would have a similar requirement.
* With this patch applied, the test gets further, but it still fails (for other reasons). I don't think that affects #92885.
Fix inconsistency of local blanket impls
When a blanket impl is local, go through HIR instead of middle. This fixes inconsistencies with data detected during JSON generation.
Expected this change to take longer. I also tried doing the whole item through existing clean architecture, but it didn't work out trivially, and felt like it would have added more complexity than it removed.
Properly fixes#83718
Work around missing code coverage data causing llvm-cov failures
If we do not add code coverage instrumentation to the `Body` of a
function, then when we go to generate the function record for it, we
won't write any data and this later causes llvm-cov to fail when
processing data for the entire coverage report.
I've identified two main cases where we do not currently add code
coverage instrumentation to the `Body` of a function:
1. If the function has a single `BasicBlock` and it ends with a
`TerminatorKind::Unreachable`.
2. If the function is created using a proc macro of some kind.
For case 1, this is typically not important as this most often occurs as
a result of function definitions that take or return uninhabited
types. These kinds of functions, by definition, cannot even be called so
they logically should not be counted in code coverage statistics.
For case 2, I haven't looked into this very much but I've noticed while
testing this patch that (other than functions which are covered by case
1) the skipped function coverage debug message is occasionally triggered
in large crate graphs by functions generated from a proc macro. This may
have something to do with weird spans being generated by the proc macro
but this is just a guess.
I think it's reasonable to land this change since currently, we fail to
generate *any* results from llvm-cov when a function has no coverage
instrumentation applied to it. With this change, we get coverage data
for all functions other than the two cases discussed above.
Fixes#93054 which occurs because of uncallable functions which shouldn't
have code coverage anyway.
I will open an issue for missing code coverage of proc macro generated
functions and leave a link here once I have a more minimal repro.
r? ``@tmandry``
cc ``@richkadel``
Move param count error emission to end of `check_argument_types`
The error emission here isn't exactly what is done in #92364, but replicating that is hard . The general move should make for a smaller diff.
Also included the `(usize, Ty, Ty)` to -> `Option<(Ty, Ty)>` commit.
r? ``@estebank``
Properly track `DepNode`s in trait evaluation provisional cache
Fixes#92987
During evaluation of an auto trait predicate, we may encounter a cycle.
This causes us to store the evaluation result in a special 'provisional
cache;. If we later end up determining that the type can legitimately
implement the auto trait despite the cycle, we remove the entry from
the provisional cache, and insert it into the evaluation cache.
Additionally, trait evaluation creates a special anonymous `DepNode`.
All queries invoked during the predicate evaluation are added as
outoging dependency edges from the `DepNode`. This `DepNode` is then
store in the evaluation cache - if a different query ends up reading
from the cache entry, it will also perform a read of the stored
`DepNode`. As a result, the cached evaluation will still end up
(transitively) incurring all of the same dependencies that it would
if it actually performed the uncached evaluation (e.g. a call to
`type_of` to determine constituent types).
Previously, we did not correctly handle the interaction between the
provisional cache and the created `DepNode`. Storing an evaluation
result in the provisional cache would cause us to lose the `DepNode`
created during the evaluation. If we later moved the entry from the
provisional cache to the evaluation cache, we would use the `DepNode`
associated with the evaluation that caused us to 'complete' the cycle,
not the evaluatoon where we first discovered the cycle. As a result,
future reads from the evaluation cache would miss some incremental
compilation dependencies that would have otherwise been added if the
evaluation was *not* cached.
Under the right circumstances, this could lead to us trying to force
a query with a no-longer-existing `DefPathHash`, since we were missing
the (red) dependency edge that would have caused us to bail out before
attempting forcing.
This commit makes the provisional cache store the `DepNode` create
during the provisional evaluation. When we move an entry from the
provisional cache to the evaluation cache, we create a *new* `DepNode`
that has dependencies going to *both* of the evaluation `DepNodes` we
have available. This ensures that cached reads will incur all of
the necessary dependency edges.
Add a `try_clone()` function to `OwnedFd`.
As suggested in #88564. This adds a `try_clone()` to `OwnedFd` by
refactoring the code out of the existing `File`/`Socket` code.
r? ``@joshtriplett``
We already have overflow: hidden on these links, but if there is a
possibility to wrap, they will wrap. This happens in particular for trait
implementations because the punctuation (`<>, `) introduces opportunities
for breaks. That produces inconsistent UI. Fix it by forcing them not to
wrap.
The previous PR, #93165, still performed the drop range analysis
despite ignoring the results. Unfortunately, there were ICEs in
the analysis as well, so some packages failed to build (see the
issue #93197 for an example). This change further disables the
analysis and just provides dummy results in that case.
This agrees with Clang, and avoids an error when using LTO with mixed
C/Rust. LLVM considers different behaviour flags to be a mismatch,
even when the flag value itself is the same.
This also makes the flag setting explicit for all uses of
LLVMRustAddModuleFlag.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #92513 (std: Implement try_reserve and try_reserve_exact on PathBuf)
- #93152 (Fix STD compilation for the ESP-IDF target (regression from CVE-2022-21658))
- #93186 (Fix link to CVE-2022-21658)
- #93188 (rustdoc: fix bump down typing search on Safari)
- #93212 (Remove unneeded cursor pointer rule on mobile sidebar)
- #93231 (adjust sidebar link brightness)
- #93241 (Fix brief appearance of rust logo in the sidebar)
- #93253 (Update theme on pageshow event)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Update theme on pageshow event
When a user goes forward or back, the page may be rendered from the back/forward cache (https://web.dev/bfcache/) rather than from scratch. If they have changed theme in the meantime, that means seeing an incorrect theme on the page they went forward or back to. The `pageshow` event fires on such navigations, so we can update the theme based on that event.
Demo: https://rustdoc.crud.net/jsha/theme-on-show/std/string/trait.ToString.html
r? `@GuillaumeGomez`